V prihodnjih dneh naj bi se v irskem parlamentu začela pomembna razprava o prihodnosti lovljenja zajcev - tradicionalnega športa, ki vključuje lovljenje živih zajcev s greyhoundi. Polemika se osredotoča na predlog zakona, ki ga je predstavil People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, s ciljem prepovedati prakso zaradi dobrega počutja živali. Kljub široko razširjenemu nasprotovanju javnosti se je vlada odločila, da se nasprotuje predlogu zakona, predstavniki koalicije pa niso dobili prostega glasovanja o tem vprašanju. Ta odločitev je ključni trenutek v tekoči razpravi o etiki in ureditvi lovljenja zajcev na Irskem.
Predlog zakona o zdravju in dobrobiti živali (prepovedi lovljenja zajcev) iz leta 2020 želi prepovedati ta šport na podlagi zaskrbljenosti zaradi ravnanja z zajci, ki se po irskem zakonu štejejo za zaščiteno vrsto.
7 milijonov letno v irsko gospodarstvo, predvsem v korist podeželskih skupnosti. Collins trdi, da obstoječi okvir zagotavlja blaginjo zajcev, s strogimi pogoji za licenco za lov in nadzor Nacionalne službe za parke in divje živali. Poudarja, da je trenutna stopnja žrtev med zajci pod enim odstotkom, kar je bistveno manj kot pred uvedbo ustnice leta 1993.
Poleg tega trdi, da ima šport za podeželske skupnosti pomembno družbeno funkcijo, saj daje občutek namena in vključenosti, zlasti starejšim članom v zimskih mesecih.
Kljub vladnemu stališču Murphy in drugi trdijo, da etični razlogi presegajo gospodarske koristi. Trdijo, da je praksa inherentno kruta in da je treba glas javnosti, izražen skozi ankete, jemati resno.
Razprava je prav tako pritegnila pozornost različnih političnih frakcij. Medtem ko sta Fianna Fáil in Fine Gael trdno usklajena s stališčem vlade, so nekateri TD v teh strankah izrazili osebne zadržke glede lovljenja zajcev.
Medtem ko se zakon približuje odločilnemu glasovanju, so posledice izida še vedno negotove. Če bi bila prepoved sprejeta, bi lahko potencialno privedla do tega, da bi šport postal podzemni, kjer bi mu manjkalo regulacije in nadzora. Nasprotno, če bi prevladal vladni položaj, bo nadaljevanje lovljenja zajcev odvisno od ohranjanja obstoječega regulativnega okvira in zagotavljanja, da dobrobit zajcev ostaja osrednja skrb. Prihodnje glasovanje ne predstavlja le preizkusa zakonodajnih prednostnih nalog, temveč tudi odsev širših družbenih vrednot glede dobrobiti živali in ravnovesja med tradicijo in sodobno etiko.
5 poročil
RTÉ NewsDržavni / javniLevoDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 3 dneviIn June 2026, a motion was proposed in the Irish parliament (Dáil) to ban hare coursing on animal welfare grounds. The proposal was brought forward by People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, who argued that the practice causes cruelty to animals. However, government party TDs, particularly those from Fine Gael, were expected to oppose the motion, with the Coalition deciding not to grant a free vote on the issue. The government stated that they could not support the ban without independent scientific evidence and emphasized strengthening enforcement against illegal hare hunting instead. Murphy criticized the decision, noting that Fine Gael had previously advocated for more free votes on matters of conscience, yet hares did not qualify for such consideration. He expressed hope that some backbenchers would defy party lines and align with public opinion, which supports banning hare coursing.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article frames the debate around animal welfare and public sentiment, highlighting concerns about cruelty and public opinion. While the government's stance is presented as pragmatic and based on scientific evidence, the emphasis on public support for banning hare coursing and criticism of the 'l
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 75): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports the political stance and actions related to the hare coursing ban. It provides details about the proposed legislation, the involvement of specific politicians, and government positions. Objectivity is somewhat lower due to the inclusion of quotes
The Irish TimesNeodvisen🔒LevovčerajPaul Murphy, a People Before Profit TD, is urging other members of parliament to push their political parties to allow a free vote on the Animal Health and Welfare (Ban on Hare Coursing) Bill 2020, which seeks to prohibit hare coursing due to concerns over animal welfare. The bill is currently under debate in the Dáil, with the government opposing it and Sinn Féin also stating it will not support the legislation. Independent TD Barry Heneghan supports the bill and plans to oppose the government on the issue. This is the third attempt to introduce such legislation, following previous efforts in 1993 and 2015. Murphy argues that hare coursing is a cruel practice that harms thousands of hares annually and calls for a renewed cultural taboo against it, noting the Irish hare’s unique status and historical significance in Irish culture. Minister of State Niall Collins stated the government will not allow a free vote and continues to support hare coursing, citing regulatory measures and low casualty rates.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article presents arguments from both sides of the issue but emphasizes the moral and ethical concerns raised by Murphy and others regarding hare coursing, using strong language like 'annual torture,' 'barbarism,' and 'cruel practice.' The framing highlights the cruelty of the practice and the呼吁（
TheJournal.ieNeodvisenSredinavčerajA bill to ban hare coursing was debated in Ireland's Dáil Éireann, with opposition from Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael and support from the Social Democrats, Greens, Labour, and some independents. Hare coursing, a controversial sport involving greyhounds chasing hares, remains legal in Ireland despite the animals being protected under wildlife laws. The bill, introduced by People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, cited public opposition and concerns over animal welfare. Fianna Fáil TD Niall Collins criticized the comparison between domesticated pets and hares as 'nonsense,' arguing for a regulated system that benefits rural communities and provides educational value. The debate highlights differing views on animal rights, regulation, and the role of public opinion in shaping policy.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents a balanced discussion of the debate surrounding the hare coursing bill, featuring arguments from both supporters and opponents. While the issue is politically charged, the framing does not clearly favor one side over the other. The language used by both sides is relatively non-p
RTÉ NewsDržavni / javniLevopredvčerajšnjim Murphy poziva k prepovedi "okrutne prakse" preganjanjaTD Paul Murphy iz skupine People Before Profit-Solidarity je predlagal zakon o prepovedi lovljenja zajcev, ki ga imenuje "kruto prakso" in trdi, da bi morala Irska uskladiti z evropskimi standardi. Poudaril je letno ujetje in usposabljanje na tisoče zajcev, ki jih lovijo psi in jih pogosto poškodujejo ali ubijejo. Murphy je poudaril potrebo po pravilnem nadzoru, če bi bilo lovljenje prepovedano. Nasprotno pa je Fianna Fáil TD Peter 'Chap' Cleere zagovarjal lovljenje kot visoko regulirano podeželsko tradicijo, pri čemer je opozoril na njegovo gospodarsko vrednost približno 70 milijonov € letno in njegov zgodovinski pomen, ki sega več kot stoletje. Trdil je, da so zajci zakonsko zaščiteni in da šport že deluje pod strogimi predpisi, vključno z obveznimi veterinarskimi ukrepi in varnostnimi ukrepi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): V članku se lov na zajce obravnava kot škodljiva in zastarela praksa, poudarjajo pa se skrbi za dobrobit živali in kritizira stališče vlade.
TheJournal.ieNeodvisenSredinapredvčerajšnjim TDs brani glasovanje proti hare coursing Bill kljub osebno verjamejo praksa bi morala biti prepovedanaNačrt zakona o prepovedi lovljenja zajcev na Irskem se sooča z nasprotovanjem Fianna Fáil in Fine Gaela, ki sta se odločila, da bosta za glasovanje proti zakonodaji naložila partijsko bič.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni stališča različnih političnih strank in posameznikov, ne da bi očitno naklonjeni eni strani.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
Ireland
