Generalni tožilec kritizira zvezno tožilstvo

The Austrian Federal Prosecutors' Office has expressed strong criticism of the planned federal prosecutors' office, calling it a move that would lead to a “massive deterioration” compared to the current system. According to a statement released yesterday, the Generalprokuratur believes that the new structure will not eliminate the perceived issue of political influence, known as “Anscheinsproblematik”, but instead shift or even intensify it. The statement highlights concerns that the selection of federal prosecutors and their deputies, which would be determined by the National Council, could undermine judicial independence. The proposed legislation aims to create a centralized body responsible for prosecuting crimes at the federal level. However, the Generalprokuratur argues that this change would allow the new institution to absorb the functions currently held by the existing prosecutorial bodies. This, they claim, risks centralizing power and reducing transparency in the prosecution process. The statement was issued in response to a draft law under review, which outlines the establishment of the federal prosecutors' office. Among the key criticisms raised by the Generalprokuratur is the composition of the selection committee, which would determine who becomes a federal prosecutor. They argue that this body’s makeup could introduce political bias into the appointment process. Additionally, the short six-year term for federal prosecutors is viewed as problematic, as it limits long-term stability and expertise within the office. The Generalprokuratur also points to the dual responsibility of these officials toward both the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, which could complicate their ability to act independently. From a European legal perspective, the proposal raises further concerns. The Generalprokuratur states that the expanded reporting obligations of the federal prosecutors to both the National Council and the federal council contradict principles of independent criminal prosecution. It notes that such extensive oversight could compromise the autonomy of prosecutors, making them more susceptible to external pressures. These concerns suggest that the reform might conflict with EU standards on judicial independence and the rule of law. The debate over the federal prosecutors' office reflects broader tensions within Austria's legal framework regarding the balance between accountability and independence. While supporters of the reform argue that a unified body could improve efficiency and coordination in handling complex cases, critics warn that it could erode the checks and balances essential to fair justice. The Generalprokuratur’s stance underscores the deep divisions among legal experts and policymakers on how best to structure the country’s prosecutorial system. As the legislative process moves forward, the government faces mounting pressure to address these concerns. Some lawmakers have called for amendments to the draft law, particularly around the selection process and tenure of federal prosecutors. Others maintain that the reforms are necessary to modernize the system and ensure consistency in the application of the law. With public interest growing, the outcome of this debate could shape the future of Austria’s judiciary for years to come.