ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Zakaj v Nemčiji izgine toliko spletnih ocen
Germany🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 19 urami

Zakaj v Nemčiji izgine toliko spletnih ocen

Članek obravnava naraščajoče število spletnih pregledov, ki se odstranijo iz Google Maps v Nemčiji, zlasti iz restavracij in hotelov. Anketa več kot 3.700 gostinskih podjetij v več nemških mestih je pokazala, da je med 11% in 30% ustanov izbrisalo spletne preglede, pri čemer je višja stopnja v večjih mestih, kot so Frankfurt, Berlin in Köln. Upravni direktor Dehoga Bundesverband, Jürgen Benad, poudarja, da bi morala ostati legitimna kritika, vendar lahko podjetja odstranijo preglede, ki vsebujejo obrekovanje, ponarejene ocene ali lažne trditve.

In Germany, a growing number of online reviews have been removed from Google Maps due to complaints over defamation, according to a recent survey conducted by the German Press Agency (dpa). The study examined more than 3,700 restaurants and hotels in several German cities and found that between 11 and 30 percent of these businesses had deleted reviews. The proportion was particularly high in major urban centers such as Frankfurt, Berlin, and Cologne, where nearly one-third of the surveyed establishments reported review deletions. Jürgen Benad, managing director of the Dehoga national association representing hotel and restaurant operators, emphasized the importance of online reviews for many businesses. “Online reviews are an essential part of how businesses present themselves to customers,” he stated. He noted that while constructive criticism should remain, businesses often remove reviews that contain defamatory content, fake ratings, or false factual claims. This practice helps maintain trust in rating platforms, which rely on distinguishing legitimate feedback from misuse. The issue extends beyond Germany within Europe. According to data from the EU Transparency Database under the Digital Services Act, over 756,500 posts were removed from Google Maps in the first half of 2026 across the European Union. Remarkably, almost 99.9 percent of these removals occurred in Germany, highlighting the country's unique position in this trend. Many businesses reported that they only file complaints against reviews they deemed fabricated, insulting, or entirely invented. Some establishments mentioned instances where individuals attempted to exert pressure through threats of poor reviews. These tactics, however, are generally considered unethical and are typically rejected by business owners who prioritize transparency and fair treatment. Google has introduced a transparency measure to inform users when a profile has had reviews removed. This notice appears directly beneath the review section in a business’s Google listing. The company explains that this feature is intended to increase clarity, especially in Germany, where a large volume of complaints related to defamation under local law have led to frequent removals. Google defines defamation broadly, including untrue factual assertions or opinions not substantiated by facts. Businesses can also claim that the reviewer was not a genuine customer. While some businesses argue that removing reviews could negatively impact their visibility, Google maintains that the presence of this notice does not affect search rankings or local search results. Instead, it aims to provide users with information about potential biases or issues with the review system. According to the dpa survey, approximately half of the affected businesses reported deleting between one and 20 reviews. About 20 percent had deleted between 21 and 50 reviews, while a smaller group had deleted up to 250 reviews. Many businesses cited reasons such as spam, bot-generated reviews, or false statements as justifications for their actions. Some operators also mentioned that they would report hate speech or inciting remarks to Google, as these types of comments violate community guidelines. Several businesses stressed that they believe honest, factual criticism should remain visible, as it contributes to service improvement. They argued that allowing constructive feedback helps them better serve their customers and maintain quality standards. Despite these efforts, the debate over the balance between free expression and protecting businesses from harmful misinformation continues to shape the landscape of online reviews in Germany.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Pojdite k primarnim virom (1)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

2 poročil

heise online logoheise onlineNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 60pred 19 urami
Zakaj v Nemčiji izgine toliko spletnih ocen

Članek obravnava naraščajoče število spletnih pregledov, ki se odstranijo iz Google Maps v Nemčiji, zlasti iz restavracij in hotelov. Anketa več kot 3.700 gostinskih podjetij v več nemških mestih je pokazala, da je med 11% in 30% ustanov izbrisalo spletne preglede, pri čemer je višja stopnja v večjih mestih, kot so Frankfurt, Berlin in Köln. Upravni direktor Dehoga Bundesverband, Jürgen Benad, poudarja, da bi morala ostati legitimna kritika, vendar lahko podjetja odstranijo preglede, ki vsebujejo obrekovanje, ponarejene ocene ali lažne trditve.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pogled, saj navaja tako perspektivo gostoljubnih podjetij kot regulativni okvir, ki ga zagotavlja zakon EU o digitalnih storitvah.

Zakaj dejstva (80): The article references the EU-Transparenzdatenbank and mentions the deletion of over 756,500 entries in the first half of 2026 due to 'illegal content,' aligning with the primary source document. However, it lacks specific details about the dashboard's structure or data aggregation methods described

Zakaj objektivnost (60): While the article attempts to present both sides, it leans toward supporting businesses by highlighting their justification for removing reviews. It includes quotes from industry representatives but could have presented more diverse perspectives or included counterpoints from consumers or regulators

Die Zeit logoDie ZeitNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 30Objektivnost 50pred 23 urami
Gastronomija: izbris spletnih ocen: Koliko so vredne zvezdice?

V članku se razpravlja o praksi izbrisov spletnih ocen restavracij in hotelov, pri čemer je poudarjen njihov pomemben vpliv na odločitve potrošnikov. V članku je navedena raziskava Deutsche Presse-Agentur (dpa), ki je analizirala več kot 3700 ustanov in razkrila, da so mnogi odstranili preglede zaradi pritožb. V članku je pojasnjeno, kako Google zdaj prikazuje obvestilo, ko se pregledi izbrišejo, in navaja ukrepe za preglednost, povezane z zahtevki za obrekovanje po nemškem pravu. Strokovnjaki poudarjajo gospodarski pomen spletnih ocen, pri čemer ugotavljajo, da vplivajo na izbiro strank in zaposlovanje. Pogostnost izbrisov ocen se razlikuje med mesti, pri čemer so višje stopnje v večjih urbanih središčih, kot sta Berlin in Frankfurt.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežene informacije iz različnih vidikov, vključno z mnenji strokovnjakov in podatki iz ankete, ki jo je izvedla ugledna novinska agencija.

Zakaj dejstva (30): The article discusses the removal of online reviews but does not reference the EU-Transparenzdatenbank directly. It cites a dpa survey of over 3,700 restaurants and hotels, but there is no mention of the primary source document provided. The claim about Germany accounting for nearly all deletions is

Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article presents the issue with a clear bias towards the perspective of restaurant owners and industry representatives, emphasizing the economic impact of review removals. It uses emotionally charged language like 'unangenehm' (unpleasant) and frames the situation as a justified response to fake

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe