The number of millionaires in Britain has reached its lowest level in 20 years, according to a report released by the Adam Smith Institute (ASI), a free-market think tank. The figure stands at 442,000, marking a 7 per cent drop from 2024 and the smallest number since the 2008 financial crisis. The decline is attributed to factors such as high taxation, threats of further tax increases, including a proposed wealth tax, and changes in policies affecting non-resident taxpayers. The report highlights the negative consequences of these trends, noting that the top 1 per cent of earners contribute 29 per cent of income tax. The ASI used data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Wealth and Assets Survey, which is conducted every two years. The report adjusted the data to reflect the number of millionaires in constant 2025 pounds, accounting for inflation and currency fluctuations. The findings indicate a decrease in inflation-adjusted asset prices and a reduced household savings rate, both contributing to the decline in the number of millionaires. The report warns that each millionaire who leaves the country represents a loss to the economy, reducing capital available for British businesses and weakening the entrepreneurial spirit. The issue of wealth taxation has become a focal point in the debate surrounding the economic landscape of the UK. Over 100 British-based millionaires, including prominent figures such as Gary Lineker, Richard Curtis, and Gary Stevenson, have called on Prime Minister Andy Burnham to implement a wealth tax. In an open letter organized by Patriotic Millionaires UK, these individuals stated that they are willing to pay more taxes, specifically targeting the wealthiest individuals whose income is derived from accumulated wealth rather than regular employment. The letter emphasized that such a tax would not burden those earning wages but would focus on the richest segment of the population. The proposed wealth tax, a 2 per cent levy on wealth exceeding £10 million, could generate approximately £24 billion annually, according to campaigners. Additionally, Patriotic Millionaires advocate for reforms to capital gains tax, aiming to align it with income tax rates, which could yield another £12 billion annually. The movement gained traction following a similar campaign in the United States, where nearly 400 millionaires participated in a call for higher taxes during the World Economic Forum in Davos last year. Patriotic Millionaires, established in response to perceived inequalities and concerns about democratic erosion, seeks to promote fair taxation and reduce the undue influence of wealth in politics. Reactions to the proposal have varied. While some, like Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith, expressed concern over the potential exodus of wealthy individuals, others, including members of Patriotic Millionaires, view the initiative as necessary for addressing growing inequality. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride criticized the government for not clarifying how its spending promises would be funded, emphasizing the need for transparency in fiscal planning. Meanwhile, the letter from Patriotic Millionaires underscores the belief that the wealthiest can afford to contribute more to ensure a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. Public opinion on the proposed wealth tax has shown mixed responses. While many support the idea, they emphasize the necessity of closing existing loopholes to prevent tax evasion. Suggestions include implementing exit taxes, tightening reporting requirements, and ensuring that tax advisors adhere to strict regulations. Critics argue that without robust mechanisms to prevent circumvention, the effectiveness of the tax could be undermined. Some readers even question the need for legislative action, pointing out that millionaires could voluntarily donate to the Treasury without waiting for new laws. Despite these concerns, the call for a more progressive taxation system continues to gain momentum, reflecting broader societal discussions on equity and fiscal responsibility.
12 poročil
Daily MailNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 65pred 4 dneviŠtevilo milijonarjev v Veliki Britaniji se je zmanjšalo na najnižjo raven v zadnjih 20 letih, glede na poročilo Adam Smith Institute (ASI). To zmanjšanje, ki je posledica visoke obdavčitve, groženj z davkom na bogastvo, odprave režima ne-dom in padajočih cen premoženja, je povzročilo zaskrbljenost zaradi gospodarskih posledic. ASI trdi, da izseljevanje milijonarjev škoduje gospodarstvu z zmanjšanjem kapitala, mednarodnih povezav in podjetniške dejavnosti. V poročilu so navedeni podatki iz ONS Wealth and Assets Survey in opozarja, da bi se lahko trend odražal v Franciji, Avstriji in na Nizozemskem. Toryjev poslovni predstavnik Andrew Griffith je izrazil zaskrbljenost zaradi izgube prispevnikov za davčno bazo in ustvarjanje delovnih mest.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je zmanjšanje števila milijonarjev označeno kot negativna posledica davčne politike laburistične stranke, zlasti pa je poudarjena grožnja davka na bogastvo in vpliv visoke obdavčitve na ustvarjalce bogastva.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article cites the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) report and references the ONS Wealth and Assets survey as its data source. It provides specific numbers (442,000 millionaires, 7% decrease) and attributes the decline to factors like high taxation, wealth tax proposals, and changes in immigration poli
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article takes a clear stance in favor of free-market policies and criticizes Labour's economic approach, using emotionally charged language such as 'haemorrhaging wealth' and 'misguided.' It also presents the ASI as an authoritative voice without acknowledging potential biases, leading to a one-
Davek na bogastvo bi lahko prinesel 10 milijard funtov na leto, pravijo znanstveniki Andyju BurnhamuAkademiki predlagajo 2-odstotni davek na bogastvo za gospodinjstva v Združenem kraljestvu z več kot 100 milijoni funtov v premoženju, ocenjujejo pa, da bi lahko letno ustvarila 10 milijard funtov. Predlog, ki ga vodijo profesor Gabriel Zucman in Ben Tippet, trdi, da bi davek zmanjšal neenakost in uskladil najvišje zaslužnike s standardnimi davčnimi stopnjami. Ciljal bi na manj kot 1000 gospodinjstev in zahteval, da bi HMRC ocenil sredstva, kot so nepremičnine, podjetja in umetnost. V poročilu kritizirajo pretekle davke na bogastvo, ker so preveč široke in ponujajo vrzeli, zagovarjajo pa osredotočen pristop.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je davek na bogastvo opredeljen kot progresivna reforma, namenjena zmanjšanju neenakosti, pri čemer je poudarjen njegov potencial za ustvarjanje pomembnih prihodkov in zagotavljanje pravičnosti.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately describes the state of the social care system in England, referencing Burnham's past attempts at reform and the current challenges. It aligns closely with the BBC source, discussing the need for systemic change and the role of unpaid carers.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is informative and balanced, presenting the issue without strong ideological leanings. It focuses on the practical aspects of reform without overtly favoring one political perspective.
Novara MediaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 70pred 9 dneviVeč kot 100 britanskih milijonarjev, vključno s slavnimi osebnostmi, kot sta Gary Lineker in Richard Curtis ter Gary Stevenson, je podpisalo pismo, v katerem pozivajo župana Mančesterja Andyja Burnhama, naj uvedbe davka na bogastvo najbogatejših posameznikov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni stališča bogatih posameznikov in njihova zagovorništvo davka na bogastvo, poleg tega pa je Burnham odprt za razmislek o takih ukrepih.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article discusses the letter from millionaires to Burnham, referencing the Patriotic Millionaires group and their call for higher taxes. It aligns with the BBC source on the general topic but lacks depth on the broader implications of the social care crisis or Burnham's reform plans.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is supportive of the millionaires' initiative, highlighting their willingness to pay more. It frames the request as a civic responsibility, which could be seen as subtly endorsing the idea.
Daily MirrorNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 75Objektivnost 70pred 10 dneviSkupina 120 britanskih milijonarjev, vključno z nogometno legendo Garyjem Linekerjem, je pozvala novega premierja Andyja Burnhama, naj uvede davek na bogastvo za ultra bogate. V pismu, ki ga je organizirala skupina Patriotski milijonarji, trdijo, da bi obdavčevanje bogastva namesto dohodka ustvarilo znatne prihodke za javne storitve. Predlagajo 2% davek na premoženje, ki presega 10 milijonov funtov, kar bi lahko prineslo 24 milijard funtov letno. Ukrep bi vplival na manj kot 0,04% prebivalstva in bi lahko financiral velike pobude, kot so razširitev brezplačnih šolskih obrokov, konec zmrznitve stanovanjskih koristi in povečanje obrambnih odhodkov. Predlog poudarja potencialne finančne koristi ciljanja skrajnega bogastva za javno dobro.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se zahteva progresivno stališče, ki poudarja pravičnost in družbeno odgovornost.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article discusses academic estimates of potential revenue from a wealth tax and references the report by Gabriel Zucman and Ben Tippet. It aligns with the BBC source on the broader topic of tax reform and Burnham's openness to the idea. However, it doesn't delve deeply into the social care crisi
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone remains neutral, presenting the academic findings without overt bias. It highlights the potential benefits of a wealth tax without strongly endorsing or opposing the idea.
Phys.orgNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 70pred 10 dneviPoročilo raziskovalcev s King's College London, Paris School of Economics in University of California, Berkeley kaže, da bi lahko z uvedbo minimalnega letnega davka 2% na gospodinjstva v Združenem kraljestvu, ki imajo več kot 100 milijonov funtov v bogastvu, do leta 2026 ustvarili približno 10 milijard funtov. Predlog je namenjen najbogatejšim 0,001% gospodinjstev, ki trenutno imajo 16% britanskega BDP v bogastvu. Davek bi veljal za bogastvo in ne za dohodek, obravnaval vrzeli v obstoječih davkih, kot so kapitalski dobički in davek na dediščine.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo razpravo o morebitnih gospodarskih vplivih in upravni izvedljivosti predlaganega davka, pri čemer navaja akademske raziskave, ne da bi javno podprl ali kritiziral politiko.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article reports on a study by academics from King's College London, the Paris School of Economics, and the University of California, Berkeley. It provides specific figures like £10 billion in potential revenue and mentions the number of affected households. While these numbers are presented as e
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is informative but leans slightly towards supporting the idea of a wealth tax as a fairer system. Phrases like 'dramatically wealthier' and 'lower effective tax rates' imply a value judgment about wealth distribution, which introduces a slight bias.
Ali bi Andy Burnham moral uvesti davek na premoženje najbogatejših Britancev?V članku je predstavljena anketa, v kateri se sprašuje, ali bi moral novi premier Andy Burnham uvedeti davek na bogate Britance. V članku so poudarjene podpore pomembnih osebnosti, kot sta Gary Lineker in člani skupine Patriotic Millionaires UK, ki trdijo, da si bogati lahko privoščijo plačati več. Predlagajo 2% davek na najbogatejša gospodinjstva, kar bi lahko ustvarilo znatne prihodke. Vendar pa v članku tudi kritizira konzervativni senčni kancler Sir Mel Stride, ki dvomi v sposobnost vlade, da financira svoje obljube o porabi brez jasnih načrtov financiranja. Članek zaključi s povabiljem bralcev, da sodelujejo v anketi in delijo svoja stališča.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja argumente za in proti uvedbi davka na bogastvo, s stališči zagovornikov in kritikov.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article explains the concept of a wealth tax and mentions the proposed 2% levy on wealth over £10 million. It cites the Patriotic Millionaires and other groups, aligning with the BBC source on the general topic. However, it lacks specific details about the social care crisis and Burnham's immedi
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article presents the wealth tax as a viable option, focusing on its potential revenue and implementation. It uses neutral language but implies that the tax is a necessary step, which could be seen as leaning towards supporting the idea.
Davek na bogastvo britanskih superbogatih bi lahko prinesel 10 milijard funtov na leto, je povedal Andy BurnhamAkademiki so predlagali potencialni davek na bogastvo, usmerjen proti britanskim superbogatih, ki bi lahko ustvaril do 10 milijard funtov letno. To bi vključevalo 2% minimalno obremenitev gospodinjstev z več kot 100 milijoni funtov bogastva, kar bi vplivalo na manj kot 1000 najbogatejših družin v državi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni akademski predlogi in navedki več strokovnjakov, ne da bi se očitno zavzemali za katero koli politično stran.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article introduces the concept of a wealth tax based on academic research and quotes Burnham's general statements about fairness and taxation. It aligns with the primary source's mention of Burnham's interest in making tax fairer but does not directly reference the social care reform discussion.
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article presents the wealth tax idea as a viable solution but frames it in a positive light, suggesting it could address societal inequities. While it does not explicitly criticize Burnham, the emphasis on fairness and the potential benefits of the tax could be interpreted as subtly supporting t
Daily MailNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 55pred 12 dnevi Andy Burnham opozarja na vrnitev najvišje davčne stopnje 50 centov in opozarja, da bo pomoč pri življenjskih stroških morala biti financirana s strani bogatejših.Andy Burnham, novoimenovani britanski premier, je namignil na možnost ponovne uvedbe najvišje davčne stopnje 50 centov kot del morebitnih davčnih reform, namenjenih reševanju krize življenjskih stroškov. Medtem ko je v manifestu laburistov navedeno, da se trenutna najvišja davčna stopnja ne bo povečala nad 45 centov, je Burnham predlagal, da se zadeva še vedno obravnava. Poudaril je zaskrbljenost zaradi vpliva zamrznjenih davčnih pragov od leta 2021, zaradi katerih je več posameznikov, vključno z upokojenci z nizkimi dohodki, potisnilo v višje davčne skupine. Burnham je priznal izzive pri prilagajanju teh pragov, pri čemer je opozoril na finančne omejitve, s katerimi se sooča vlada.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pogled na pripombe Andyja Burnhama glede morebitnih davčnih sprememb, vključno z njegovim priznanjem potrebe po financiranju in izzivih, povezanih s spreminjanjem davčnih politik.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article closely follows the BBC source, accurately reporting Burnham's stance on the 'death tax' and his plans for social care reform. It includes relevant background on his previous proposals and the Conservative response, maintaining alignment with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting Burnham's position alongside the opposition from the Conservatives. While it highlights the controversy around the 'death tax', it does not overtly criticize Burnham's stance, keeping the focus on factual reporting.
BBC News (UK)Državni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 65Objektivnost 60pred 9 dneviSkupina britanskih milijonarjev, med katerimi so tudi znane osebnosti, kot sta nekdanji nogometaš Gary Lineker in glasbeni producent Brian Eno, je napisala novoimenovanemu premierju Andyju Burnhamu in zahtevala povečanje obdavčitve najbogatejših posameznikov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se poziva k višjim davkom za bogate kot moralni in domoljubni dolžnosti, ki poudarja pravičnost in družbene koristi.
Zakaj dejstva (65): The article discusses the letter from millionaires to Burnham, referencing the Patriotic Millionaires group and their call for higher taxes. While it aligns with the BBC source on the general topic, it does not provide detailed context about the social care crisis or Burnham's broader reform agenda.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone suggests a positive outlook on the millionaires' initiative, emphasizing their willingness to pay more. It frames the request as a civic duty, which could be interpreted as subtly endorsing the idea of taxing the wealthy.
Daily MirrorNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 65Objektivnost 60pred 10 dnevi Šest ključnih točk o davku na premoženje v Združenem kraljestvu - vključno s tem, kako bi lahko denar uporabljaliV članku se razpravlja o predlogu davka na bogastvo v Združenem kraljestvu, ki ga podpirajo osebnosti, kot je nekdanji televizijski voditelj Gary Lineker in skupine, kot so Patriotic Millionaires UK. Predlogi vključujejo 2% letni davek na bogastvo nad 10 milijonov funtov, kar bi lahko vplivalo na približno 20.000 posameznikov. Drugi predlogi vključujejo enkratni 1% nujni davek na premoženje nad 4 milijoni funtov in 1% letni davek na premoženje nad 10 milijonov funtov z 2% stopnjo na premoženje nad 1 milijardo funtov, kot je predlagal Zelena stranka. Zagovorniki trdijo, da bi lahko davek ustvaril znatne prihodke, ki bi lahko financirali osebje NHS in obrambne odhodke.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je predlog davka na bogastvo opredeljen kot progresiven ukrep, namenjen reševanju neenakosti, pri čemer se poudarja sposobnost ultrabogatih, da si privoščijo višje obdavčitve, hkrati pa se poudarjajo morebitne koristi za javne storitve.
Zakaj dejstva (65): The article repeats the content of the letter from millionaires to Burnham, aligning with the BBC source. It provides names of signatories and quotes from Gary Lineker, but lacks depth on the broader implications of the social care crisis or Burnham's reform plans.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone is supportive of the millionaires' initiative, highlighting their commitment to a fairer society. It frames the request as a civic responsibility, which could be seen as subtly endorsing the idea of taxing the wealthy.
Patriotski Milijonarji: Skupina, ki stoji za superbogati, ki zahtevajo, da plačajo več davkovVeč kot 120 britanskih milijonarjev je javno pozvalo britanskega premierja Andyja Burnhama, naj poveča davke za najbogatejše posameznike, da bi financiral "boljšo Britanijo". Skupina Patriotic Millionaires UK trdi, da trenutne davčne politike nesorazmerno koristijo ultra bogatih, medtem ko zanemarjajo državljane delavskega razreda.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je zahtevek za višje davke za bogate kot moralni imperativ za družbeno stabilnost in pravičnost, poudarja potrebo po progresivnem obdavčevanju in zmanjšanju nepotrebnega vpliva bogastva na demokracijo.
Zakaj dejstva (60): This article focuses on the Patriotic Millionaires group and their demands for higher taxes on the wealthy, which is not directly related to the main topic of social care reform discussed in the BBC source. It lacks direct connection to the core event and introduces unrelated information about the g
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article presents the millionaire petition as a significant political development, implying urgency and moral obligation. It uses emotionally charged language like 'demanding they pay more tax' and emphasizes the 'super rich,' which could be seen as biased toward the narrative of wealth inequalit
Bralci zahtevajo nepremagljiv davek na bogastvo po milijonarjevem pismu Andyju BurnhamuVeč kot 100 britanskih milijonarjev, vključno z nogometno legendo Garyjem Linekerjem, je pisalo premierju Andyju Burnhamu, v katerem pozivajo k povečanemu obdavčevanju svojega bogastva, trdijo, da si ga lahko bogati privoščijo. Neodvisni bralci so prevladujoče podprli davek na bogastvo, pri čemer se je skoraj 80% strinjalo, čeprav so mnogi poudarili, da je treba najprej zapreti davčne vrzeli. Komentatorji so pozvali k ukrepom, kot so izstopni davki, strožji zahtevi za poročanje in licenciranje davčnih svetovalcev, da bi preprečili utajo. Nekateri so predlagali, da bi lahko milijonarji prostovoljno darovali HMRC, namesto da bi se zanašali na zakonodajo, medtem ko so drugi kritizirali prednostne naloge vladnih porabe. Razprava poudarja naraščajoči javni pritisk za pravičnejši davčni sistem bogastva.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pogled na razpravo o obdavčitvi premoženja, ki vključuje tako pozive k reformi, ki jih pozivajo bogati kot tudi javno mnenje.
Zakaj dejstva (30): The article contains minimal factual information related to the primary source document. It focuses on a letter from millionaires to Burnham about wealth taxation, which is unrelated to the core topic of social care reform discussed in the primary source. There is little alignment with the actual co
Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article presents a biased perspective favoring wealth taxation without providing balanced coverage of the broader social care reform discussion. It emphasizes reader opinions rather than presenting objective facts about the situation.
United Kingdom
