PSG's attacking midfielder Noah Nsoki has chosen Zagreb over other European clubs, with Dinamo having secured his services ahead of the upcoming season. According to French sports newspaper L'Équipe, the 19-year-old forward has opted for the Croatian club, citing its ambitious project and potential for growth within the country. The transfer is expected to be finalized soon after negotiations between the two clubs. Nsoki, who joined PSG as a 13-year-old in 2020, has already made his senior debut for the French champions. His first appearance came on December 20, 2025, during a 4-0 victory against Fontenay in the Coupe de France, where he played the last half of the match. In January 2026, he earned his first minutes in Ligue 1, participating in a 2-1 win over Paris FC. Described as an incredibly fast player with excellent one-on-one skills, Nsoki is currently valued at around one million euros by Transfermarkt. Dinamo has been actively seeking reinforcements for their left wing position, and Nsoki fits the bill perfectly. While several clubs, including Portuguese side Vitória Guimarães, were interested in signing him, the Croatian club’s vision and long-term strategy have won him over. His agent and father spent time in Zagreb, discussing the opportunity and confirming the decision. The transfer will see Nsoki move to Maksimir, where he can continue developing under the guidance of coach Luis Enrique. In addition to Nsoki, Dinamo has also confirmed the arrival of Slovenian striker Aleks Stojaković, 22, from Lokomotiva. The club will pay 750,000 euros for the transfer, with Stojaković signing a four-year contract. Stojaković had a successful season with Lokomotiva, scoring eight goals in the SuperSport HNL and adding two assists in the Croatian Cup. He can play multiple positions in attack, making him a versatile option for coach Marija Kovačević. Meanwhile, the situation surrounding goalkeeper Dominik Livaković continues to evolve. The 31-year-old has expressed a desire to return to Dinamo, and both the club and his representatives are engaged in discussions. However, Fenerbahçe, his current club, has rejected Dinamo’s initial offer of three million euros fixed compensation plus an additional million through bonuses. Talks with Italian club Torino have also intensified, with both parties exploring options for a transfer. Despite these developments, a final agreement has yet to be reached. Another notable transfer involves Gorica, which has signed goalkeeper Renato Josipović, 25, from Dinamo. Josipović, who previously played for Rudeš, Bravo Slovenia, Pafos Cyprus, and Široki Brijeg, has joined Gorica on a free transfer. He has experience playing for younger teams within Dinamo and has been a reliable presence in the senior squad since joining as a 19-year-old. Josipović has expressed satisfaction with his new role, stating he is eager to begin this new chapter in his career. The summer transfer window has also seen interest in other players, such as young talents being pursued by top European clubs. For example, French winger Akliouche has attracted attention from both PSG and Liverpool, with Monaco acting as the intermediary. PSG has reportedly offered around 34 million pounds (approximately 40 million euros) for the player, though Monaco has so far refused to accept the bid. Liverpool has entered the race, raising the stakes further for PSG. Akliouche’s versatility and technical ability make him a highly sought-after prospect, and Monaco is likely to seek maximum value from the competing offers. As the transfer window progresses, key decisions remain pending, particularly regarding Livaković’s future. His injury sustained during the World Cup has delayed some aspects of the negotiation, but both Dinamo and the player remain committed to a potential return. Meanwhile, the influx of new signings underscores the competitive nature of the market, with clubs striving to strengthen their squads ahead of the new season. The coming weeks will determine whether these transfers materialize, shaping the landscape of European football for the upcoming campaigns.
17 poročil
Telegram.hrNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 4 dneviČlanek poroča, da je 18-letni francoski napadalnik Noah Nsoki, ki trenutno igra za Paris Saint-Germain (PSG), blizu pridružitvi zagrebaškemu klubu Dinamo. Po francoski publikaciji L'Équipe je Nsoki Dinamo izbral kot svojo naslednjo destinacijo zaradi svojega razvojnega projekta na Hrvaškem.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o športnem prenosu, ne da bi sprejel politično stališče, saj zagotavlja objektivne podrobnosti o igralčevi karieri, morebitni premiki in trenutni uspešnosti, ne da bi izrazil kakršno koli ideološko ali partijsko stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports on Noah Nsoki’s potential transfer to Dinamo based on information from L'Equipe. It provides details about his age, position, and career trajectory, aligning with the primary source's focus on transfer negotiations. No significant inaccuracies are present.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains neutral, presenting facts about Nsoki’s decision and the ongoing negotiations without expressing personal opinion or bias. The language is straightforward and informative.
Net.hrNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 4 dneviDinamo Zagreb je dogovorio prelazak 19-letnega francoskega nogometaša Noah Nsokija iz Parize Saint-Germaina (PSG). Nsoki, ki lahko igra na poziciji levi krili ali ofenzivni veznog, je odabran kot novi član kluba po tem, ko je njegov oče in agent dokazali čas za zagreb kako bi se uvjerili v projekt. Predhodno je postojala opcija da nadaljuje kariero v Portugalski kod Vitorije Guimarães, vendar je Nsoki izbral Dinamo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o športnem prenosu in ne vključuje politično nabitih tem, kot so vlada, volitve ali javna politika.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article corroborates the previous one by confirming Noah Nsoki's interest in joining Dinamo and his selection over other clubs like Vitoria Guimaraes. It references L'Equipe and provides additional context about his role and future at Dinamo, maintaining consistency with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on reporting the transfer process and Nsoki’s choice without injecting personal commentary or emotional language.
tportalNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 4 dneviČlanek poroča, da je 19-letni francoski nogometaš Noah Nsoki izbral Dinamo Zagreb pred drugimi možnostmi, vključno z Vitória Guimarães.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek obravnava športni transfer in ne vključuje političnih vprašanj, vlade ali javne politike.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article discusses Aleks Stojaković’s potential transfer to Dinamo, including financial terms and performance stats. While factual about his contract and playing style, it does not connect to the primary source document about Livaković. It focuses on a different player and transfer, so it is less
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone is more promotional, highlighting Stojaković’s strengths and potential impact on Dinamo. While not overtly biased, it leans slightly towards positive promotion of the new signing.
tportalNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 4 dnevi Dinamo prinaša enega najboljših napadačev SHNL-a.Hrvaški nogometni klub Dinamo Zagreb je objavil transfer 22-letnega slovenskega napadalca Aleksa Stojakovića, ki je bil v pretekli sezoni eden najpomembnejših igralcev Lokomotive. Dinamo bo za njegov prelaz plačal 750.000 evrov, Stojaković pa bo podpisal štiriletno pogodbo s hrvaškim prvakom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Vijest se temelji na športnih aktivnostih in prenosu igralcev, kar ne spodbuja politične kontroverze. Vrsta informacija in okvir prikazuje njihovo nevtralnost in osredotočenost na športne dogodke brez političnega vpliva.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article covers the failed transfer attempt of Smail Prevljak from Istra to Dinamo, detailing the financial disagreement between the clubs. It provides factual information about the negotiation process and the amount offered, though it does not reference the primary source document about Livakovi
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article presents the situation in a somewhat negative light toward Dinamo’s offer, suggesting they were underprepared financially. While not overtly biased, there is a slight tilt in favor of Istra’s stance.
Jutarnji listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 8 dneviV članku se razpravlja o trenutni situaciji, ki vključuje vratarja Dominika Livakovića in njegovo potencialno prihodnost pri Dinamu Zagreb. Livaković je povezan s turškim klubom Fenerbahçe, in poročajo o pogajanjih med klubi. Vendar pa je Livakovićeva trenutna posojilna pogodba z Dinamo potekla, zaradi česar ni upravičen do igranja v drugem krogu kvalifikacij za Ligo prvakov proti Thunu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na teme, povezane s športom, zlasti na nogometne prenose in pravila o upravičenosti v evropskih tekmovanjih.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article closely mirrors the primary source document, covering the ongoing negotiations and the technical constraints surrounding Livaković's potential return. It provides accurate details about the timeline and requirements, showing high factual consistency.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is neutral, presenting the situation without overt bias. However, there is a slight emphasis on the challenges faced by Dinamo, which could be seen as a mild editorial tilt.
Večernji listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70včerajV članku se razpravlja o poletni transferni situaciji, ki vključuje hrvaškega vratarja Dominika Livakovića, ki naj bi Fenerbahče zapustil ob koncu sezone. Dinamo Zagreb je že dal finančno ponudbo v višini treh milijonov evrov fiksnega nadomestila in dodatnega milijona prek bonusov, ki jih je Fenerbahče zavrnil. Medtem sta tudi dva tuja kluba Torino in drugi, kot sta Crystal Palace in Celtic, zainteresirani za podpis Livakovića. V članku je navedeno, da Dinamo ostaja favorit zaradi želje igralca, da se vrne domov, vendar je negotovost, ali bo na koncu ostal v klubu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja transferno situacijo kot športni dogodek, ki se osredotoča na pogajanja klubov in gibanje igralcev, ne da bi zavzel politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article closely follows the primary source document, detailing the discussions between Dinamo, Torino, and Livaković's representatives. It includes specific financial figures and the current state of negotiations, maintaining high factual accuracy.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the situation in a way that supports Dinamo's interest in bringing back Livaković, subtly implying that Torino is also interested. This suggests a slight editorial lean towards Dinamo's position.
Jutarnji listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 60pred 3 dnevi Dinamo ne bo plačal milijona evrov, toda zadetek iz lanske sezone je prišel na Maksimira!V članku se razpravlja o obstoječem transferskem razmerju med Dinamo Zagrebom in Istrabasketom, poudarjajo pa se pretekli transferi, kot so Igor Pamić, Dejan Radonjić in nedavno Mauro Perković, Moris Valinčić in Mateo Lisica.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na športne prenose med dvema nogometnima kluboma, brez omembe političnih osebnosti, politik ali spornih socialnih vprašanj.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article discusses Dinamo's transfers from the 1990s to present, focusing on players coming from Istra and others. It mentions specific names and amounts but does not directly reference the primary source document about Livaković. While factual about past transfers, it lacks direct connection to
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone is promotional and nostalgic, celebrating past transfers and players. The article presents information in a celebratory manner rather than providing an objective report on current events. This affects neutrality.
Telegram.hrNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 75včeraj Novice iz Turčije o Dominu Livakoviću, ki naj bi ga hotel klub iz Serije A.Nov razvoj dogodkov v Turčiji, ki vključuje vratarja Dominika Livakovića, kaže, da bi se lahko vrnil v Hajduk Split. Turški notranji obveščevalec Yağız Sabuncuoğlu je poročal, da sta Torino in Dinamo stopila v stik z predstavniki Livakovića. Igralec namerava zapustiti Fenerbahče med poletnim prestopnim oknom, medtem ko turški klub išče odškodnino med 5-6 milijoni evrov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja informacije o pogajanjih o prenosu, povezanih s športom, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports on the ongoing transfer saga involving Dominik Livaković, including the offers from Dinamo and the stance of Fenerbahçe. It references the primary source document and provides specific figures and timelines, showing good alignment with the facts.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): While the content is factual, the tone leans slightly towards supporting Dinamo's efforts to bring back Livaković, suggesting a preference for the club's position over neutrality. This introduces a minor bias.
tportalNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 70pred 5 dnevi Istra je za napadalec zahtevala dvakrat več, kot so ponudili Modri.Članek obravnava tekoče pogajanja o prenosu med HNK Dinamo Zagreb in NK Istra 1961 glede igralca Smaila Prevljaka. Po tem, ko je Prevljak izrazil zanimanje za vstop v Dinamo in tekmovanje za trofeje in evropske tekme, je bil vzpostavljen začetni stik. Vendar pa so se pogovori ustavili, saj je Istra zavrnila prvo ponudbo Dinama med 500.000 in 600.000 evrov. Klub vztraja, da bodo razpravljali le o finančnem nadomestilu, ki zahteva vsaj en milijon evrov za Prevljaka. To predstavlja dvakratni znesek, ki ga je ponudil Dinamo, pri čemer je prihodnost igralca negotova, razen če Dinamo bistveno poveča svojo ponudbo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je situacija predstavljena nevtralno, s poudarkom na finančnih vidikih pogajanj o prenosu, ne da bi se postavljali na eno stran, poroča pa o stališčih obeh strani in trenutnem stanju razprav brez očitnega ideološkega nagibanja.
Zakaj dejstva (80): Article discusses Smail Prevljak’s potential transfer to Dinamo, noting Dinamo’s initial offer of between €500,000–€600,000 and Istra 1961’s demand of at least €1 million. These figures align with cross-source reporting, though no primary source confirms exact numbers. Consensus among sources suppor
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone leans slightly towards Istra 1961’s position, emphasizing their firm stance and rejecting offers. While not overtly biased, the emphasis on Istra’s demands may subtly favor their perspective.
Telegram.hrNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 70pred 8 dnevi Tudi če ga Dinamo vrne, ne bo mogel braniti v prvih dveh tekmah.V članku se razpravlja o situaciji glede Dominika Livakovića, ki bi se lahko vrnil v Hajduk Split (Dinamo). Kljub govoricam o njegovem možnem vrnitvi trenutno ni potrditve. Omeni, da sta Dinamo in Fenerbahçe vpletena v pogajanja, z načrtovanim srečanjem med Livakovičem in člani upravnega odbora Dinama.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o prenosu, povezanem s športom, brez jasnega ideološkega stališča. Poroča o statusu morebitne vrnitve igralca v nogometni klub, pri čemer se osredotoča na logistične in regulativne omejitve in ne izraža političnega ali ideološkega stališča.
Zakaj dejstva (80): This article aligns well with the primary source document, discussing the technical aspects of Livaković's potential return and the implications for Dinamo's European matches. It provides specific details about the rules and deadlines, demonstrating strong factual support.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is slightly supportive of Dinamo's position, emphasizing the importance of Livaković's return for the team. This introduces a minor bias, though the overall reporting remains relatively balanced.
tportalNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 65včeraj Livakovičev agent se pogaja z dvema kluboma.Članek poroča, da se Livakovičev agent pogaja z dvema kluboma, Dinamo Zagreb in Torino, glede morebitnega prenosa iz Fenerbahče. Dinamo je ponudil 3 milijone evrov plus možen bonus, vendar je Fenerbahče ponudbo zavrnil. Torino je pokazal zanimanje in ocenjuje finančne pogoje, medtem ko oba kluba nameravata najti dogovor, ki bo Livakoviču omogočil vrnitev na Hrvaško.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o nogometnih prestopkih, ne da bi se tako očitno naklonil nobenemu klubu ali političnemu stališču.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article covers the injury of Dominik Livaković and its impact on his transfer situation. It references the primary source document and provides relevant context about his performance at the World Cup and ongoing negotiations. However, it lacks detailed specifics on the exact terms of the offer.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone is somewhat negative regarding the potential delay caused by the injury, which could be seen as a slight editorializing. The focus on the problem rather than the broader implications makes it less balanced.
Telegram.hrNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 80pred 4 dnevi V Gorico je prišel golman, ki je branil Dinamo in naslednjega Hajdukovega nasprotnika: "Zelo sem srečen".Nov vratar, RENAT Josipović, se je po podpisu pogodbe pridružil nogometnemu klubu iz Bosne in Hercegovine, Velika Gorica. 25-letnik je pred tem igral za mladinske ekipe Dinama Zagreb, preden je debitiral pri 19 letih.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o prenosu, povezanem s športom, brez kakršnih koli političnih posledic.
Zakaj dejstva (70): Article discusses the signing of Renato Josipović by Gorica, providing details about his career and transfer. It does not mention Dominik Livaković or any related transfers, so it aligns with the primary source document only tangentially. The information given is factual and sourced from the club’s
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone is positive and celebratory, focusing on the new player's satisfaction and future goals. While this is common in transfer announcements, there is little critical analysis or balance, making it slightly less objective than ideal.
tportalNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 75pred 5 dnevi Turci trdijo, da je Livaković blizu podpisati za Dinamo.Članek poroča o možnem prenosu hrvaškega vratarja Dominika Livakovića iz turškega kluba Fenerbahçe v zagrebski Dinamo. Po informacijah iz turških virov je Livaković domnevno dosegel dogovor z Dinamo, ki bi vključeval sprejetje skoraj dvakratnega znižanja plače v primerjavi s svojimi trenutnimi zaslužki v Fenerbahče.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja nasprotujoče se informacije iz neimenovanih virov glede morebitnega prenosa Dominika Livakovića, ne da bi se jasno postavil na katero koli stran.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article discusses the situation around Dominik Livaković, referencing the primary source document and providing details about the negotiations and possible return to Dinamo. It includes specific dates and conditions, showing a good level of factual accuracy.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is generally neutral, presenting both sides of the negotiation. However, there is a subtle emphasis on Dinamo's desire to bring back Livaković, which could be interpreted as a slight editorial preference.
Jutarnji listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 65Objektivnost 60pred 5 dnevi Kljub temu, da so Dinamo hladnokrvno zavrnili, za svojega napadalca zahtevajo dvakrat toliko.V članku se razpravlja o trenutni transferni situaciji, ki vključuje Smaila Prevljaka, igralca, povezanega tako z Dinamo Zagreb kot z Istro 1961. Prevljak je izrazil željo, da bi igral za klub, ki tekmuje v evropskih tekmovanjih, kar Istro 1961 trenutno ne more ponuditi. V članku se omenja, da so se pogajanja med Istro 1961 in Dinamo začela, pri čemer je Dinamo sprva ponudil 50% zneska, ki ga išče Istro 1961.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na pogajanja o prestopkih, ki so povezana s športom, in ne predstavlja nobenih očitno pristranskih okvirov. Poroča o finančnih in pogodbenih vidikih položaja, ne da bi zavzel jasen ideološki položaj.
Zakaj dejstva (65): This article focuses on the situation of Smail Prevljak and potential transfers involving Istria 1961 and Dinamo. It contains some factual elements but lacks direct connection to the primary source document. There are mentions of financial negotiations and club dynamics, though these are speculative
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article has a somewhat biased tone towards the financial interests of clubs, especially highlighting the demands of Udinese and the reluctance of Istria 1961. This creates an imbalance in reporting, leaning more toward one side of the negotiation.
Jutarnji listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 60Objektivnost 60pred 3 dnevi Slaba novica iz Turčije, bo to vplivalo na operacijo?Članek poroča o poškodbi hrvaškega vratarja Dominika Livakovića med svetovnim prvenstvom, ki je privedla do dve do tri tedne trajajočega obdobja okrevanja. Ta poškodba se zgodi v kritičnem trenutku, ko se odloča o njegovem prihodnjem klubu med Dinamo Zagrebom in Fenerbahče. Livaković je bil ključni igralec za Hrvaško med turnirjem, kar je okrepilo njegov status kot enega najboljših vratarjev v državi. Razprave o njegovem možnem vrnitvi v Dinamo so se nadaljevale, pri čemer so se predstavniki obeh klubov in igralcev ukvarjali s pogajanji. Medtem ko Dinamo verjame, da bi njegova vrnitev okrepila njihovo ekipo pred evropskimi izzivi, Fenerbahče še naprej iščejo specifičen transferni model. Članek ugotavlja, da bi poškodba lahko odložila postopek prenosa, čeprav začetne ocene kažejo na razmeroma enostavno okrevanje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na športne vsebine v zvezi s poškodbo nogometaša in pogajanji o prenosu, ki ne vključujejo politično nabitih tem, kot so vladne politike, volitve ali družbena vprašanja.
Zakaj dejstva (60): This article appears to be based on unverified sources, claiming that a deal is close. It contradicts the primary source document which states that no agreement has been reached. The lack of concrete evidence reduces its factual reliability.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone is overly optimistic and sensational, suggesting that the deal is almost finalized. This creates a sense of urgency and excitement that may not be supported by the actual situation, introducing a clear bias.
Index.hrNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 50Objektivnost 70pred 8 dneviDinamo Zagreb je pridobil Ivana Dragića, zelo talentiranega mladostnika iz Hajduka Osijeka. Dragić, rojen leta 2011, je standardni član hrvaške reprezentance za mlajše od 15 let.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o športnem prenosu brez kakršnih koli političnih komentarjev, okvirov ali pristranskosti.
Zakaj dejstva (50): This article is unrelated to the main topic of Dominik Livaković and focuses on a different transfer involving Ivan Dragić. As such, it does not provide any relevant information about the primary source document or the transfer saga.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article is objectively reporting on a different transfer, so it maintains a neutral tone. However, since it is not related to the main event, it does not contribute to the discussion on Livaković's situation.
tportalNeodvisenSredinapred 9 urami Spektakel na trgu: Liverpool in PSG v tekmi za velike talente.Članek razpravlja o tekmovalnih ponudbah med Paris Saint-Germainom (PSG) in Liverpoolom za storitve mladega nogometaša Aklioucheja. PSG je že dal več ponudb Monaku, njihova zadnja ponudba pa je dosegla okoli 34 milijonov funtov (40 milijonov dolarjev). Monaco je zavrnil to ponudbo in odprl vrata za druge klube, da vstopijo v tekmo. Liverpool je zdaj začel razprave z Monakom glede pogojev morebitnega prenosa. Akliouche je opisan kot tehnično usposobljen, ustvarjalen igralec, ki lahko igra več pozicij v napadu, zaradi česar ga zelo iščejo vrhunski klubi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pregled prestopne situacije, ne da bi sprejel jasno ideološko stališče. Poroča o dejanjih več klubov in vrednosti igralca, ne da bi favoriziral katero koli posebno ekipo ali politični program.
Croatia
