Po večletnih razpravah naj bi Francija sprejela končno odločitev o umiranju s pomočjo zdravnika
Francija se pripravlja na sprejetje spornega zakona, ki bo po večletnih razpravah omogočil asistirano umiranje. Spodnji dom parlamenta, Narodna skupščina, naj bi zakonodajo odobril v sredo, kljub nasprotovanju konzervativnih senatorjev. Zakon, ki ga podpira predsednik Emmanuel Macron, določa stroge pogoje za upravičenost, vključno s trpljenjem zaradi neuzdravljive bolezni in neznosno bolečino. Zahteva zdravniško preverjanje in omogoča bolnikom, da pod nadzorom sami dajejo smrtonosno snov. Zakon se zdaj sooča s pregledom francoskega ustavnega sveta, ki ima pooblastilo, da razveljavi dele zakonodaje. Desničarski zakonodajalci, zlasti iz stranke Les Républicains, so močno nasprotovali ukrepu, trdili, da ne obravnava skrbov glede njegove implementacije.
French lawmakers are set to approve a groundbreaking law allowing assisted dying, marking a major shift in the country's approach to end-of-life care. The National Assembly, France's lower house of parliament, is scheduled to cast its final vote on Wednesday, bringing the controversial legislation closer to becoming law. The measure, backed by President Emmanuel Macron, has sparked intense debate among politicians, religious leaders, and the public. The proposed law establishes a framework for assisted dying under strict conditions. It applies to adults suffering from an incurable illness and requires them to demonstrate their ability to make free and informed decisions. Patients must experience physical pain that is either unresponsive to treatment or deemed unbearable by them, even if they choose to discontinue medical care. A physician verifies the patient's eligibility, followed by a review by a panel. Ultimately, the doctor decides whether to proceed, though the patient retains the right to revoke consent at any point. In cases where a patient is physically incapable of administering the lethal substance, a healthcare professional may assist. The path to this final vote has been arduous, spanning over a decade of political maneuvering. The bill, authored by Olivier Falorni, a former legislator turned mayor, was initially rejected by the Senate, which is dominated by conservative forces. Despite this setback, the government opted to allow the National Assembly to pass the law independently, as permitted by the constitution. This decision came after the Senate failed to adequately debate the proposal, leading to criticism that the legislation did not fully address the concerns of opponents. Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has instructed the Constitutional Council, France's top constitutional authority, to scrutinize the law following its passage. The council, known for its rigorous examination of legislation, could potentially invalidate parts of the bill or issue reservations. Right-wing figures, including Senate Speaker Gerhard Larcher and former Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, have consistently opposed the measure, arguing it poses risks to vulnerable individuals. Supporters of the law argue it strikes a balance between respecting individual autonomy and safeguarding ethical standards. Agnès Firmin Le Bodo, a center-right politician and former health minister, described the law as “balanced” and essential for modern society. However, detractors remain unconvinced. Christophe Bentz of the far-right National Rally party labeled the text “very dangerous,” warning of potential abuses. Religious organizations and anti-abortion advocates are also expected to rally outside the National Assembly on the day of the vote, protesting the measure. President Macron had pledged to enact the law during his re-election campaign in 2022, positioning it as one of his key social reforms. If approved, France would become the latest European nation to legalize assisted dying, joining the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, and Canada. The law represents a significant evolution in France's progressive policies, echoing earlier advancements such as the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2012. As the National Assembly prepares to cast its vote, the outcome will shape France's future stance on end-of-life choices. While the law faces opposition from powerful political and religious factions, its approval would signal a bold step toward greater personal freedom in medical decision-making. The Constitutional Council's response will determine whether the law proceeds unchanged or undergoes further revisions. Regardless of the immediate result, the debate surrounding assisted dying continues to gain momentum in France.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Francoska nacionalna skupščina se pripravlja odobriti sporen zakon, ki dovoljuje asistirano umiranje, kar je pomemben korak k legalizaciji prakse. Zakonodaja, ki jo je podprl predsednik Emmanuel Macron, se je soočila s kritiko nasprotnikov, ki še naprej zagovarjajo njeno izvajanje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja zakon kot vprašanje nacionalne politike, pri čemer se osredotoča na zakonodajni proces in stališča podpornikov in kritikov.
France 24 (English)Državni / javniSredinapred 17 urami
Francija se pripravlja na sprejetje spornega zakona, ki bo po večletnih razpravah omogočil asistirano umiranje. Spodnji dom parlamenta, Narodna skupščina, naj bi zakonodajo odobril v sredo, kljub nasprotovanju konzervativnih senatorjev. Zakon, ki ga podpira predsednik Emmanuel Macron, določa stroge pogoje za upravičenost, vključno s trpljenjem zaradi neuzdravljive bolezni in neznosno bolečino. Zahteva zdravniško preverjanje in omogoča bolnikom, da pod nadzorom sami dajejo smrtonosno snov. Zakon se zdaj sooča s pregledom francoskega ustavnega sveta, ki ima pooblastilo, da razveljavi dele zakonodaje. Desničarski zakonodajalci, zlasti iz stranke Les Républicains, so močno nasprotovali ukrepu, trdili, da ne obravnava skrbov glede njegove implementacije.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja zakon kot politično sporno vprašanje z znatnim nasprotovanjem desničarskih frakcij, vendar pa ne favorizira eno stran nad drugo.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.