ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Podjetniške skrivnosti: Apple toži ChatGPT-družbo Open AI
Germany🏛️ PolitikaBolj progresivnopred 3 dnevi

Podjetniške skrivnosti: Apple toži ChatGPT-družbo Open AI

Apple je obtožil Open AI in dva bivša sodelavca, da so se ukvarjali z krajo poslovnih skrivnosti. Nekdanji Appleov oblikovalec Tang Tan, zdaj vodja strojne opreme za Open AI, je bil obtožen, da je dal zaupne informacije o zasnovi iPhonea podjetju KI. Poleg tega je med intervjuji za odprto AI sodelavec Apple vzel dele, da bi dobil dostop do zaupnih podatkov. Še en bivši Appleov sodelavec je bil obtožen, da je že kot posrednik na zaupnih podatkih za odprto AI.

Apple has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging that the artificial intelligence company stole trade secrets from the tech giant. The legal action centers around claims that OpenAI encouraged former Apple employees to leak confidential information, including internal documents and supplier data. According to the complaint, two high-ranking ex-employees of Apple, Tang Tan and Chang Liu, are also named as defendants. The case highlights growing tensions between the two companies, particularly as OpenAI develops new products that could directly compete with Apple’s offerings. The lawsuit was filed following investigations by Apple, which concluded that Tang Tan, who previously worked at Apple for over 20 years and was responsible for designing the iPhone and Apple Watch, used confidential information to benefit OpenAI. Among other allegations, Apple claims that Tan encouraged current employees to bring parts of Apple's devices to job interviews at OpenAI. This, according to the lawsuit, represents part of a broader strategy by OpenAI to gain access to sensitive corporate data. Meanwhile, Chang Liu, another former Apple employee, allegedly accessed confidential data using a computer he had taken with him after leaving the company. Tang Tan is currently serving as hardware chief at OpenAI, playing a central role in the development of a new device aimed at leveraging artificial intelligence. His transition from Apple to OpenAI appears to have been pivotal in helping the latter attract talent from Apple. Jony Ive, Apple’s long-time design lead known for shaping the look of iPhones and MacBooks, was reportedly hired by OpenAI, further strengthening its position in attracting Apple employees. Tang Tan is described as the highest-ranking defector from Apple to date. According to the lawsuit, Apple believes that OpenAI systematically sought to acquire confidential information through these individuals. One specific instance cited involves an interview process where Apple employees were asked to bring components of their work to OpenAI interviews. Such actions, Apple argues, amount to industrial espionage and undermine competitive advantage. OpenAI has yet to formally respond to the allegations, though earlier reports indicated that the company had considered suing Apple itself for breach of contract. This potential conflict arose due to concerns that the partnership between Apple and OpenAI, which allows Apple users to route queries to ChatGPT when Siri cannot answer them, had not met expectations. However, OpenAI has since stated in a statement to Bloomberg that it has no interest in stealing secrets from other companies and remains focused on developing innovative technology. The relationship between Apple and OpenAI has evolved significantly over the years. Initially partners in integrating artificial intelligence into Apple devices, the collaboration has become increasingly complex as both firms expand their product lines. Apple’s recent accusations suggest that this partnership may be under strain, especially as OpenAI works on new technologies that could challenge Apple’s market position. The legal battle raises questions about the boundaries of competition in the tech industry and how companies protect their intellectual property. With both Apple and OpenAI investing heavily in artificial intelligence, the outcome of this case could set a precedent for future disputes involving trade secrets and employee mobility. As the investigation unfolds, more details are likely to emerge regarding the extent of alleged misconduct and the potential impact on both companies' operations.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Pojdite k primarnim virom (1)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

3 poročil

Tagesschau (ARD) logoTagesschau (ARD)Državni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 80pred 3 dnevi
Apple toži OpenAI zaradi domnevno ukradenih poslovnih skrivnosti

Apple je vložil tožbo proti OpenAI in obtožil podjetje, da je ukradlo poslovne skrivnosti. Po tožbi so bili nekdanji Appleovi zaposleni spodbujeni, da bi posredovali zaupne informacije. Dva visoka nekdanja sodelavca Tang Tan, ki je zdaj vodja strojne opreme pri OpenAI, in Chang Liu, nekdanji električni inženir pri Apple naj bi vnesla mednarodne datoteke in podatke o dobaviteljih. OpenAI je izpodbijal te trditve in poudaril, da se osredotoča na inovacije. Podjetje deluje na napravi, ki naj bi uporabljala KI in potencialno tekmovala z Appleom.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Poročanje kaže na jasno predsodek v korist družbe Apple, saj prikazuje Vorwürfe kot resno kršitev poslovnih skrivnosti in OpenAI kot goljufa.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 80): This article provides clear and consistent facts from multiple sources. It maintains objectivity by presenting both Apple's allegations and OpenAI's response, though it leans slightly towards Apple's perspective in describing the situation.

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Neodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 3 dnevi
Podjetniške skrivnosti: Apple toži ChatGPT-družbo Open AI

Apple je obtožil Open AI in dva bivša sodelavca, da so se ukvarjali z krajo poslovnih skrivnosti. Nekdanji Appleov oblikovalec Tang Tan, zdaj vodja strojne opreme za Open AI, je bil obtožen, da je dal zaupne informacije o zasnovi iPhonea podjetju KI. Poleg tega je med intervjuji za odprto AI sodelavec Apple vzel dele, da bi dobil dostop do zaupnih podatkov. Še en bivši Appleov sodelavec je bil obtožen, da je že kot posrednik na zaupnih podatkih za odprto AI.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Poročanje ostaja konkretno in se osredotoča na dejstva, kot so pritožba, udeleženci in povezave med Appleom in odprto umetno inteligenco.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 75): The article accurately reports Apple's lawsuit against OpenAI and details the involvement of ex-employees. It aligns with the cross-source consensus but uses emotionally charged terms like 'Strategie' which may imply intent beyond what is confirmed. The information is consistent across sources.

heise online logoheise onlineNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 60pred 3 dnevi
Apple toži OpenAI zaradi izkoriščanja

Apple je OpenAI in dva bivša sodelavca v zvezi z razvojem nove naprave obtožil, da so ukradli firemne skrivnosti. Eden od obtoženih, Tang Tan, je bil prej višji oblikovalec pri Appleu in je zdaj vodja strojne opreme pri OpenAI. Naj bi uporabil zaupne informacije o zasnovi iPhonea, da bi pomagal OpenAI. Poleg tega naj bi še en bivši sodelavec že uporabljal zaupne podatke OpenAI.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Poročanje o pritožbi Apple proti OpenAI ter o ozadju pritožbe ostane objektivno in nevtralno.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 70 · Objektivnost 60): The article starts with a different topic but then shifts to the Apple-OpenAI dispute. This mix-up reduces factuality as it introduces irrelevant information. Objectivity is also lower due to the confusing structure and potential bias in reporting.

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe