ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Kriza Fife se poglablja, ko tri zveze umaknejo podporo Infantinu.
NG🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 4 dnevi

Kriza Fife se poglablja, ko tri zveze umaknejo podporo Infantinu.

Tri nogometne zveze, Srbija, Švedska in Wales, so umaknile svojo podporo ponovni izvolitvi predsednika FIFA Giannija Infantina, kar je povečano nasprotovanje njegovemu vodstvu. To se je zgodilo po tem, ko je FIFA opustila sporen načrt za prodajo 20% deleža v novi komercialni enoti, ki nadzoruje velike turnirje, kot je svetovno prvenstvo, in se soočila z močnim odporom deležnikov. Srbska nogometna zveza je navedla, da je prekinila svojo prejšnjo podporo zaradi pomislekov glede ugleda in vodstva FIFA.

The Football Association of Wales has become the first national federation to officially withdraw its support for FIFA President Gianni Infantino's re-election bid, citing a series of governance issues and leadership failures. This move comes after Infantino abruptly scrapped a controversial plan to sell a 20 percent stake in a new commercial entity overseeing major tournaments, including the FIFA World Cup, due to widespread international backlash. The announcement by the Welsh FA marks a turning point in the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Infantino's leadership and FIFA's internal operations. The Welsh FA issued a formal statement confirming its decision to no longer endorse Infantino's candidacy for the 2027–2031 term. It cited a range of concerns, including poor governance, flawed decision-making processes, and a lack of alignment with the best interests of global football. The statement emphasized that these factors had eroded the FA's confidence in Infantino's ability to lead FIFA effectively. The re-election vote is scheduled to take place in Rabat in March 2027. Following Wales' withdrawal, Serbia and Sweden also announced they would no longer support Infantino's bid. The Serbian Football Association stated that it had previously supported Infantino in May but decided to reverse its stance after evaluating the recent developments that have harmed FIFA's reputation. The Swedish Football Association similarly expressed dissatisfaction with the state of FIFA's leadership, pointing to repeated issues with governance, transparency, and management. These withdrawals represent a growing wave of discontent among national associations regarding Infantino's tenure. The initial proposal to involve private investors in managing key aspects of FIFA's operations had been met with fierce resistance from various stakeholders, prompting Infantino to abandon the initiative just days before its official launch. The plan was intended to generate up to $4.2 billion in revenue, but critics argued it risked compromising the integrity of football's most prestigious tournaments. The swift reversal of the policy left many questioning the stability and direction of FIFA under Infantino's leadership. As the re-election race gains momentum, other major football nations are reportedly considering similar actions. England's Football Association, one of the largest and most influential bodies in world football, is expected to announce its own stance soon. Analysts suggest that the increasing number of withdrawals could significantly weaken Infantino's chances of securing another term, particularly if more prominent associations join the movement against him. The escalating situation highlights broader concerns about FIFA's institutional credibility and the effectiveness of its leadership structure. With several key members distancing themselves from Infantino, the organization faces mounting pressure to address systemic issues related to governance, accountability, and strategic decision-making. The outcome of the upcoming re-election will likely depend on how effectively Infantino can respond to these criticisms and restore faith in FIFA's leadership. The Football Association of Wales' decision to withdraw its support sets a precedent that could influence other national associations. As the re-election date approaches, the dynamics within FIFA are poised to shift dramatically, potentially reshaping the future of global football governance.

2 poročil

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 88Objektivnost 80pred 4 dnevi
Velški nogometni savez je umaknil podporo za Infantinovo kandidaturo za ponovno izvolitev v FIFA.

Nogometna zveza Walesa (FAW) je postala prva nacionalna zveza, ki je uradno umaknila podporo Gianniju Infantinu za ponovno izvolitev na mesto predsednika FIFA.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja odločitev FAW o umiku podpore Infantinu v nevtralnem tonu, pri čemer navaja posebne pomisleke, ki jih je združenja izrazila glede upravljanja in vodstva.

Zakaj dejstva (88): This article provides accurate details about the withdrawal of support by Wales and mentions the broader context of the failed proposal to sell a 20% stake in the World Cup. It includes quotes from the Welsh FA and aligns with the cross-source consensus on the reasons behind the withdrawal. The fina

Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting statements from the Welsh FA without overtly criticizing or praising Infantino. However, it does include a quote from Wenger that implies a positive stance toward the decision to cancel the proposal, which could be seen as slightly biased.

The Punch logoThe PunchNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 4 dnevi
Kriza Fife se poglablja, ko tri zveze umaknejo podporo Infantinu.

Tri nogometne zveze, Srbija, Švedska in Wales, so umaknile svojo podporo ponovni izvolitvi predsednika FIFA Giannija Infantina, kar je povečano nasprotovanje njegovemu vodstvu. To se je zgodilo po tem, ko je FIFA opustila sporen načrt za prodajo 20% deleža v novi komercialni enoti, ki nadzoruje velike turnirje, kot je svetovno prvenstvo, in se soočila z močnim odporom deležnikov. Srbska nogometna zveza je navedla, da je prekinila svojo prejšnjo podporo zaradi pomislekov glede ugleda in vodstva FIFA.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja situacijo, navaja izjave več nacionalnih nogometnih zvez in podrobno opisuje razloge za njihove odločitve.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports that Serbia and Sweden withdrew support for Infantino, citing concerns over FIFA's governance and transparency. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that the withdrawal was due to public backlash against the proposed sale of a 20% stake in the World Cup. However,

Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is somewhat critical of Infantino's leadership, using phrases like 'seriously damaged the image and reputation' which may imply judgment rather than neutrality. While it presents facts objectively, there is a subtle bias towards portraying Infantino negatively.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe