Preverjanje dejstev: Grafični seznam zaupnih prejemnikov sredstev iz preskusa VP Sara je ponarejen

RapplerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 19 dnevi

Na Facebooku je bil objavljen članek, v katerem so navedli 22 imen, povezanih s zaupnimi skladi, ki jih je vodila podpredsednica Sara Duterte med njenim sojenjem za impeachment. Grafik je vključeval imena, kot sta "Miggy Mango" in "Annie Gher", ki naj bi bili prejemniki teh sredstev. Vendar je Philstar.com pojasnil, da so bila ta imena izmišljena in niso prisotna v izvirnih grafičnih slikah za impeachment.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja popravek dejstev, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni politični strani.

Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports that a fabricated graphic containing false names was debunked by Philstar.com. It provides specific details about the claim, the rating given ('FALSE'), and the reasons for the fact-check, aligning closely with the cross-source consensus that the graphic was indeed fak

Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral and factual tone throughout, presenting the information objectively without taking sides or using emotionally charged language. It clearly states the findings of the fact-check and avoids any personal bias or opinion.

Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 75pred 18 dnevi

Senatorka Risa Hontiveros je izrazila zmedo glede uporabe zaupnih sredstev v pisarni podpredsednice Sare Duterte za nakup zdravil in vprašala, ali bi se ta sredstva morala šteti za pomoč ali nagrade za obveščevalce.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je uporaba zaupnih sredstev označena kot potencialno neetična ali nepravilna, kar kaže na skeptičnost do dejanj administracije.

Zakaj dejstva (80): The article discusses Senator Risa Hontiveros questioning the purpose of the confidential funds used by VP Sara Duterte's office. While it raises valid questions about the nature of the funds, it does not provide definitive answers or cite specific evidence to support the claims made. However, it al

Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article presents the concerns of Senator Hontiveros in a relatively neutral manner, allowing her questions to be the focus without overtly supporting one side over the other. However, it lacks additional context or counterpoints, slightly reducing its overall balance.

RapplerNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 30pred 17 dnevi

V članku se razpravlja o sojenju za impeachment podpredsednice Sare Duterte, ki se osredotoča na obtožbe, da je zlorabljala zaupna sredstva z napotitvijo tajnih agentov v javne šole.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek opisuje postopek obtoževanja na način, ki kaže na skeptičnost do administracije in poudarja morebitno kršitev.

Zakaj dejstva (60): The article makes several unsubstantiated claims about VP Sara Duterte using 'confidential funds' to deploy 'secret agents' to public schools, citing fictional characters like Andy Lim and Mary Grace Piattos. These details are not supported by any credible evidence or sources. Additionally, the arti

Zakaj objektivnost (30): The article uses highly biased and satirical language, such as referring to the vice president as being in a 'pickle,' suggesting she 'can throw a mean MacBook,' and inventing fictional dialogues. It also frames the situation in a mocking tone, favoring a particular narrative without presenting bala