ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Zunanja revizija ni ugotovila nobenih kršitev v Gatesovi fundaciji.
Qatar🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 8 urami

Zunanja revizija ni ugotovila nobenih kršitev v Gatesovi fundaciji.

Zunanji pregled, ki ga je naročila Fundacija Gates, ni našel dokazov o nepravilnostih v njenih interakcijah z obsojenim spolnim prestopnikom Jeffreyjem Epsteinom. Preizkus, ki ga je izvedla odvetniška družba WilmerHale, je razkril, da se je fundacija v dveh primerih med letoma 2011 in 2014 povezala z Epsteinom. Prvi primer je vključeval predlagani sklad, ki ga je svetoval donator, ki ga Epstein ni mogel izpolniti zaradi napačnih predstavitev o zavezah potencialnih donatorjev. Drugi primer je vključeval povezavo prek Mednarodnega mirovnega inštituta, kjer je bil Gates seznanjen s povezanostmi Epsteina z vodstvom organizacije. V poročilu je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni bilo kaznivih dejanj ali nepravilnih plačil, povezanih s fundacijo.

The Gates Foundation has concluded that there is no evidence of wrongdoing in its interactions with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to an external review completed by the law firm WilmerHale. The findings were announced on Tuesday following a months-long investigation commissioned by the organization in March. The report, which includes interviews with 50 current and former staff members, states that the foundation did not engage in any criminal activity or make payments linked to Epstein. The review revealed that the Gates Foundation interacted with Epstein on two separate occasions between 2011 and 2014. The first instance involved a proposed donor-advised fund aimed at supporting global public health initiatives. However, the foundation decided not to proceed with the fund after Epstein failed to meet commitments from other philanthropic partners. This decision became clear during a 2014 breakfast meeting, where the report noted that Epstein had misrepresented the potential donors' knowledge and willingness to contribute to the fund. In the second instance, Epstein facilitated an introduction between Bill Gates and the International Peace Institute (IPI) in 2012. In 2013, after IPI presented Gates with information on polio eradication efforts, the Gates Foundation awarded the institute a grant. The report stated that Gates was aware of Epstein's connections to IPI’s leadership at the time. As part of its response to the findings, the Gates Foundation has implemented new safeguards. These include a more centralized vetting process for potential donors and partners, expanded policies addressing conflicts of interest, improved training on handling sensitive information, and enhanced record management practices. While specific details of the policy changes remain undisclosed, the foundation emphasized its commitment to transparency and accountability. The release of these findings follows recent developments involving the Gates Foundation. A week prior, Berkshire Hathaway chairman Warren Buffett announced he would cease donating to the organization. Buffett, who has contributed over $47 billion in Berkshire stock since 2006, cited concerns over the foundation’s governance and ethical standards. His decision comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the foundation’s operations and relationships with high-profile individuals. During testimony before the U.S. Congress’s House Oversight Committee in June, Bill Gates acknowledged his past connections with Epstein. He described his meetings with the financier as a “grave error in judgment.” The committee had been investigating allegations of misconduct and potential violations of ethics protocols within the foundation. The Gates Foundation’s external review marks a significant step in addressing concerns raised by critics and lawmakers. While the report concludes that no wrongdoing occurred, it acknowledges the need for greater oversight and internal reforms. The foundation’s actions reflect a broader effort to navigate the complex landscape of philanthropy while maintaining public trust and adhering to legal and ethical standards. As the foundation continues to implement its new measures, the focus will remain on ensuring that future interactions align with its mission and values.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

1 poročil

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishDržavni / javniSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 78pred 8 urami
Zunanja revizija ni ugotovila nobenih kršitev v Gatesovi fundaciji.

Zunanji pregled, ki ga je naročila Fundacija Gates, ni našel dokazov o nepravilnostih v njenih interakcijah z obsojenim spolnim prestopnikom Jeffreyjem Epsteinom. Preizkus, ki ga je izvedla odvetniška družba WilmerHale, je razkril, da se je fundacija v dveh primerih med letoma 2011 in 2014 povezala z Epsteinom. Prvi primer je vključeval predlagani sklad, ki ga je svetoval donator, ki ga Epstein ni mogel izpolniti zaradi napačnih predstavitev o zavezah potencialnih donatorjev. Drugi primer je vključeval povezavo prek Mednarodnega mirovnega inštituta, kjer je bil Gates seznanjen s povezanostmi Epsteina z vodstvom organizacije. V poročilu je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni bilo kaznivih dejanj ali nepravilnih plačil, povezanih s fundacijo.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis ugotovitev zunanjega pregleda, pri čemer se osredotoča na dejanske rezultate in ne na jasno ideološko stališče.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on an external review conducted by WilmerHale, which found no wrongdoing by the Gates Foundation related to Jeffrey Epstein. It accurately describes the scope of the review, the timeframe of interactions, and the conclusions reached. However, it omits details about the controvers

Zakaj objektivnost (78): The article presents the findings of the external review in a neutral manner, focusing on the facts presented in the report. However, it uses phrases like 'rules out wrongdoing' and 'misrepresented the potential donors’ knowledge' which carry a slight evaluative tone, suggesting a bias towards the G

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe