ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Celo Nancy Pelosi glasuje za zmanjšanje pomoči Izraelu.
United States🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 10 urami

Celo Nancy Pelosi glasuje za zmanjšanje pomoči Izraelu.

Pelosi je trdila, da se mora ameriška politika spremeniti, da bi spodbudila varnost in stabilnost tako za Izraelce kot za Palestince, s poudarkom na potrebi po končanju ciklov vojne. Vendar pa je ta odločitev sprožila notranje delitve, zlasti v prihajajočih demokratičnih primarnih volitvah, kjer so se nekateri kandidati, kot je Angie Craig, soočali s kritiko nasprotnikov, ker so podpirali nadaljnjo pomoč.

Even Nancy Pelosi Is Voting to Cut Aid to Israel Now House Speaker Nancy Pelosi cast a historic vote on Wednesday to cut nearly $3.3 billion in military aid to Israel, marking a dramatic shift in the Democratic Party's approach to U.S.-Israel relations. The decision came as part of a broader effort to amend a national security spending bill, with Pelosi and 103 other House Democrats, alongside Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie, supporting the move. Among them were prominent figures such as House Democratic whip Katherine Clark and ranking members on several key committees. This action reflects growing pressure within the Democratic Party to align with its progressive base, which increasingly rejects unconditional support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu amid accusations of war crimes and human rights violations in Gaza. The vote followed months of intense internal debate within the Democratic leadership, fueled by public sentiment and grassroots activism. Many Democrats argue that continued financial backing for Netanyahu’s government undermines efforts to achieve lasting peace in the Middle East. Pelosi emphasized this point in her remarks, stating that U.S. policy must evolve to prioritize both Israeli and Palestinian security. “The American people are rightly demanding an end to a perpetual cycle of war,” she said, adding that the Netanyahu administration’s policies have become unsustainable. Despite the significance of the vote, a bipartisan majority of 314 lawmakers opposed the amendment, ensuring that the bulk of the requested aid will still flow to Israel. However, analysts noted that the scale of support for the amendment represented a major turning point. According to Politico, the vote marked a “seismic shift” in how Democrats engage with Israel-related issues. Congressional Progressive Caucus chair Greg Casar highlighted the progression, noting that while a small group of Democrats once resisted sending taxpayer money to Israel, over 100 now support blocking billions in arms shipments to Netanyahu. “This sends a strong message to Netanyahu that the days of an unaccountable blank check to his wars and war crimes are over, at least from the Democratic Party,” Casar stated. Not all Democrats welcomed the shift. In Minnesota, Rep. Angie Craig, running in an August 11 Senate primary, voted against the amendment, prompting her rival, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, to condemn the decision as “unconscionable.” Similarly, Rep. Haley Stevens of Michigan, facing a Senate primary against Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, also supported continuing aid to Israel. El-Sayed criticized Stevens for choosing “special interests” over constituents, accusing her of aligning with AIPAC and Republicans to fund a war machine that has impacted Michigan families. The vote has also intensified tensions in other races. In Michigan, State Rep. Donovan McKinney, a democratic socialist and advocate for Palestinian rights, is challenging incumbent Rep. Shri Thanedar, who opposed cutting aid to Israel. McKinney accused Thanedar of prioritizing foreign military spending over domestic concerns, calling his position “unacceptable.” These dynamics suggest that the issue of Israel aid will remain a contentious topic ahead of upcoming primaries. As the political landscape continues to shift, the implications of Pelosi’s vote extend beyond immediate policy changes. They signal a deeper realignment within the Democratic Party, one that seeks to balance traditional alliances with emerging values among younger and more diverse voters. With the November elections approaching, the question remains whether this new stance will translate into sustained legislative action or remain a symbolic gesture. For now, however, the vote stands as a defining moment in the evolving relationship between the U.S. and Israel.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Pojdite k primarnim virom (5)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

2 poročil

The Nation logoThe NationNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 75Objektivnost 50pred 20 urami
Celo Nancy Pelosi glasuje za zmanjšanje pomoči Izraelu.

Pelosi je trdila, da se mora ameriška politika spremeniti, da bi spodbudila varnost in stabilnost tako za Izraelce kot za Palestince, s poudarkom na potrebi po končanju ciklov vojne. Vendar pa je ta odločitev sprožila notranje delitve, zlasti v prihajajočih demokratičnih primarnih volitvah, kjer so se nekateri kandidati, kot je Angie Craig, soočali s kritiko nasprotnikov, ker so podpirali nadaljnjo pomoč.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek poudarja spremembo demokratičnih stališč glede pomoči Izraelu, poudarja podporo naprednih osebnosti, kot sta Pelosi in Greg Casar, ki to potezo obravnavajo kot korak k miru in pravičnosti.

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately reports that Rep. Thomas Massie introduced the amendment and that 103 Democrats supported it, including notable figures like Nancy Pelosi and Katherine Clark. It also mentions the amendment failed 104-314. However, it adds unverified details like 'their primary rivals have som

Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article takes a clear ideological stance by labeling certain Democrats as voting for 'blank checks' and suggesting their primary rivals have something to say about that. It also presents Pelosi's quote as if it were a direct statement, potentially implying bias. The tone is clearly critical of t

The Hill logoThe HillNeodvisenKonservativnopred 10 urami
AIPAC ustavi zbiranje sredstev za podprte demokrate, ki so nasprotovali pomoči Izraelu

Ameriški izraelski Odbor za javne zadeve (AIPAC) je preklical zbiranje sredstev za več kot dva ducata demokratov, ki so podprli spremembo, da bi blokirali ameriško vojaško pomoč Izraelu. Sprememba, ki jo je predstavil predstavnik Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), je imela za cilj omejiti sredstva za podporo Izraelu in zmanjšati program tujega vojaškega financiranja za 3,3 milijarde dolarjev.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je AIPAC-jev ukrep opredeljen kot načelno stališče proti "brezpogojni podpori" Izraelu, ki je v skladu s konzervativnimi stališči.

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe