Če ogroziš nacionalno varnost Hongkonga, te bom pokončal, opozarja Chris Tang.

Hong Kong's security chief, Chris Tang Ping-keung, issued a stern warning against actions that threaten national security, vowing to hold individuals accountable. The remarks came amid heightened tensions surrounding the Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA), which faces criticism over its credibility and electoral process ahead of a delayed leadership election. Tang, speaking on Friday, denounced the HKJA as "not a statutory organisation," highlighting concerns over the composition of its upcoming executive committee. According to his statements, none of the proposed candidates represent mainstream local media, with all appearing to come from foreign, so-called free, or online media backgrounds. This, he argued, undermines the association's legitimacy and its claim to represent Hong Kong journalists. The security chief further criticized the HKJA for conducting a "black box" election, citing a lack of transparency regarding candidate names and the final list of elected officials. He emphasized that such opacity could mislead the public and erode trust in the organization's integrity. Tang also referenced past controversies involving the HKJA, particularly its role during the 2019 anti-government protests. He accused the association of shielding rioters, maintaining a biased stance, and including members who have repeatedly violated the law. These allegations suggest a broader critique of the group's alignment with activities perceived as subversive to national stability. In addition to these criticisms, Tang addressed the HKJA's handling of the national security trial of former media figure Jimmy Lai Chee-ying. He claimed the association misled the public by framing the case as a press freedom issue, despite judicial rulings that found Lai guilty of colluding with foreign forces. The court determined the case had "nothing to do with press freedom," according to Tang. The HKJA's office in Wan Chai serves as a physical symbol of the organization's presence in Hong Kong. However, the recent scrutiny highlights growing divisions over the role of media in society and the boundaries of journalistic independence within the framework of national security laws. The situation reflects ongoing debates about the balance between press freedom and state authority in Hong Kong. As the leadership election approaches, the controversy surrounding the HKJA underscores the complex interplay between institutional legitimacy, media representation, and legal compliance. The outcome of these developments could influence future discussions on media governance and the protection of national interests.