Pogovarjamo šole, naj sodelujejo: vlada vztraja pri izbirnem vpisu v projekt, ki spreminja SDS

The Chilean government has reaffirmed its stance on introducing an optional admission system within the School Admission System (SAE), despite ongoing criticism from education experts and opposition lawmakers. The deadline for submitting amendments to the proposed law expired this Tuesday, with the Ministry of Education (Mineduc) having submitted its recommendations to the Education Committee of the Chamber of Deputies. The initiative aims to reintroduce merit-based admissions through an optional mechanism known as Elección Mutua, which allows schools facing over-enrollment to set their own selection criteria. The proposal has sparked controversy, particularly among educators and legal analysts who argue that the system risks undermining equity in school access. Critics have pointed to the inclusion of parent interviews as part of the process, which they claim could favor certain families over others. Despite these concerns, Mineduc maintains that the changes will give schools greater influence in student allocation while preserving the overall structure of the SAE. The ministry has acknowledged some weaknesses in the draft legislation but insists that the core principle of Elección Mutua remains intact. This week’s session saw several non-official party members, representatives from the PC, FA, PS, DC, and PDG parties, withdraw from the committee early, citing procedural irregularities. According to Daniela Serrano of the PC, the ruling coalition has been accused of maintaining an imbalance in representation, effectively limiting meaningful debate. She warned that the current approach mirrors past failures, such as the controversial Escuelas Protegidas policy, which was eventually challenged in court. Serrano emphasized that the project contains constitutional violations and that the government continues to pursue a strategy that has led to repeated setbacks in legislative processes. Mineduc officials involved in drafting the amendments clarified that the goal is to maintain a unified admission system, with Elección Mutua integrated as one of several criteria. They stressed that the new rules aim to clarify how schools can apply their own priorities without overriding state-established guidelines. Officials insist that the interviews conducted during the process serve an informational purpose rather than a direct role in admissions decisions. This distinction is crucial, as critics argue that even seemingly neutral procedures can introduce bias into the system. Among the key provisions of the government's proposals is a clause allowing schools with more applicants than available spots to use Elección Mutua. The text states: “Schools that meet the condition specified in paragraph 10 of Article 7 bis may implement the mutual election mechanism to verify their own priority criteria for assigning vacancies.” This provision has drawn particular scrutiny, as it grants schools considerable discretion in determining which students qualify under their specific rules. The debate is expected to intensify in upcoming sessions, especially regarding the extent to which oversight mechanisms should be strengthened without compromising institutional autonomy. Some lawmakers have called for stricter monitoring to prevent potential abuses, while the government argues that such measures could stifle educational freedom. The discussion will likely continue to divide political factions, with opposition groups warning against what they see as a return to flawed policies that prioritize administrative convenience over equitable access to quality education. As the legislative process moves forward, the outcome of this debate will shape how Chile’s public education system handles enrollment in the coming years. Whether the final version of the bill balances accountability with flexibility remains uncertain, but the disagreement underscores the deepening tensions between different visions of educational governance.