Državni sekretar naj bi bil v preiskavi zaradi suma korupcije. Jaklin: O tem nisem seznanjen.

24ur (POP TV)NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 100Objektivnost 95pred 4 dnevi

Članek poroča o obtožbah resne korupcije zoper Državnega sekretarja Damijana Jaklina, ki je obtožen zlorabe položaja, sprejemanja podkupnin in pranja denarja med gradnjo dela vodovodnega sistema v Pomurju v višini 8 milijonov evrov. Jaklin, ki je bil pod kazensko preiskavo v zadevi Dars, ki jo je vodil takratni minister za obrambo Valentin Hajdinjak, naj bi zdaj nezakonito prejel več kot 60.000 evrov, večinoma v gotovini, prek fiktivnih pogodb in škratskih družb. Projekt, vreden več kot 300 milijonov evrov in ki vključuje 27 občin in 120.000 prebivalcev, je bil razdeljen na tri dele, pri čemer je Jaklin nadzoroval približno 10 milijonov evrov "Sistema A". Članek navaja nepotvrdene informacije, ki kažejo, da bo Jaklin kmalu soočen z obtožbami Specializiranega državnega tožilstva.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek obravnava obtožbe korupcije kot pomembno politično vprašanje, poudarja vpletenost visokih uradnikov in morebitne pravne posledice.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 100 · Objektivnost 95): Directly mirrors the primary source document, accurately reporting the allegations against Jaklin, the nature of the alleged crimes, and the status of the investigation. Maintains neutrality in tone.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)Državni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 95pred 3 dnevi

Članek poroča o odgovoru slovenskega državnega sekretarja Damijana Jaklina na obtožbe o korupciji. Jaklin zanika kakršne koli nepravilnosti in navaja, da nikoli ni zlorabil svojega javnega položaja za osebno korist. Trdi, da se ne zaveda nobene kazenske preiskave ali obtožbe proti njemu in trdi, da bo zagotovil popoln odgovor, ko bo popolnoma obveščen. Vendar pa članek omenja tudi, da po nepreverjenih informacijah iz POP TV specializirani državni tožilec preiskuje Jaklina zaradi obtožb o korupciji.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so obtožbe proti Jaklinu oblikovane na način, ki poudarja morebitno nepravilno ravnanje in korupcijo, z uporabo izrazov, kot so "podkupnine" (podkupnine) in "pranje denarja" (pranje denarja).

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 95): Accurately reports Jaklin's denial of wrongdoing and his refusal to comment further. Provides context about his legal stance and maintains an objective tone.

24ur (POP TV)NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 3 dnevi

V članku se razpravlja o obtožbah korupcije zoper Damijana Jaklina, državnega sekretarja pod ministrom za infrastrukturo Jernejom Vrtovecem iz stranke Nova Slovenija. Po izpuščenih dokumentih, ki jih je objava pridobila, je Jaklin domnevno prejel več kot 60.000 evrov podkupnin, vključno z gotovinsko plačilo in darili, kot so LEGO opeke v vrednosti 662 evrov za svojega sina. Domnevne podkupnine so bile povezane s pogodbo, ki vključuje sredstva Evropske unije za projekt vodovodu v Pomurju.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so predstavljeni podrobni dokazi, ki nakazujejo na korupcijo med ugledno politično osebnostjo in njenimi sodelavci, s poudarkom na finančnih transakcijah in pravnih dokumentih.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): Accurately presents the allegations against Jaklin and his denial. Includes direct quotes from Jaklin's response, maintaining objectivity while presenting both sides of the story.

Info360NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 3 dnevi

The article reports on an investigation into Damijan Jaklin, the state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, who is accused of corruption related to the construction of an eight million euro section of the Pomur water pipeline. According to POP TV, Jaklin is alleged to have illegally received 60,000 euros through fictitious contracts and shell companies, primarily in cash. The investigation, led by the Specialized State Prosecutor’s Office, claims he abused his position, accepted bribes, and engaged in money laundering. Jaklin's lawyer denies any knowledge of the proceedings and asserts that his client has always acted legally and professionally. The case involves a Serbian construction company, MPP Jedinstvo, and another firm under the leadership of Jane Habjan, which was overseeing the pipeline project. Habjan allegedly received a 15% commission from the fake contract, and evidence was reportedly found during home searches and on Habjan's computer. Jaklin has denied all allegations in the preliminary hearing, while a director from the Serbian firm Mića Mićić claims that nothing illegal occurred. Minister Jernej Vrtovcu has not yet commented on the matter.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): The article frames the accusations against Jaklin in a manner that emphasizes potential misuse of power and systemic corruption, aligning with left-leaning narratives that often highlight institutional misconduct. While the facts are presented neutrally, the focus on the role of state officials and壳

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): Accurate summary of the primary source, covering the alleged corruption, the role of SDT, and the involvement of fake companies. Maintains a neutral and objective tone.

Siol.netDržavni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 3 dnevi

V poročilu se trdi, da je Jaklin nezakonito prejel več kot 60.000 evrov, večinoma v gotovini, prek fiktivnih pogodb in podjetij, ki so jih uporabljali kot entitete. Domnevne fiktivne pogodbe so vključevale srbsko gradbeno podjetje MPP Jedinstvo in podjetje JHP pod vodstvom Jane Habjan, ki je nadzorovala gradbeni projekt. Habjan je domnevno prejel 15 odstotkov. V poročilu se omenja, da so preiskovalci imeli dostop do SMS sporočil med strankami in opisali domnevno vedenje, ki ga je zagotovil eden od njihovih strank, ki je bil Jaklin na računalniku in je bil pozneje odkrit na hišnih preiskavah.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so obtožbe zoper Jaklina in Habjana oblikovane z izrazi, kot so "korupcija", "podkupnine", "pranje denarja" in "izmišljene pogodbe", ki nosijo močne negativne konotacije, običajno povezane z levičarskimi pripovedmi.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article accurately reports the allegations against Jaklin, including the fake contracts, the involvement of Jane Habjan, and the potential indictment. It also includes Jaklin's denial through his lawyer and mentions the SMS exchanges and Excel table found during searches. The content matches the

ReporterNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 3 dnevi

Članek poroča o korupcijskem škandalu, v katerem je Jaklin domnevno prejel več kot 60.000 evrov v gotovini prek fiktivnih pogodb in lažnivih podjetij med gradnjo odseka vodovodu v Murau v višini 8 milijonov evrov. Kriminalni preiskovalci v okviru Specializiranega državnega tožilstva ga obtožujejo zlorabe položaja, sprejemanja podkupnin in pranja denarja. Trdijo, da je sodeloval s srbskim gradbenim podjetjem MPP Jedinstvo in podjetjem JHP, ki ga je vodila Jane Habjan, ki je nadziral projekt. Večina sredstev iz fiktivne pogodbe je domnevno končala v rokah Jaklina prek štirih lažniških podjetij, pri čemer je Habjan prejel provizijo 15%.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je škandal označen kot jasen primer korupcije, s poudarkom na vpletenosti političnih osebnosti in zlorabi javnih sredstev.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): Accurately summarizes the primary source, including the alleged bribery, involvement of SDT, and Jaklin's denial through his lawyer. Maintains a neutral tone throughout.

Žurnal24NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 4 dnevi

Damijan Jaklin, a prominent member of the NSi party and mayor of Velika Polana, is reportedly under investigation by the Specialized State Prosecution for alleged corruption related to the construction of a section of the Pomur water pipeline. According to unconfirmed reports from POP TV, Jaklin is accused of abuse of office, accepting bribes, and money laundering, allegedly receiving over €60,000 in cash through fictitious contracts and shell companies. The investigation suggests he facilitated a €100,000 fake contract between a Serbian construction firm and another company overseeing the pipeline project. Much of the money was allegedly funneled through four shell companies into Jaklin’s possession, while the contractor received a 15% commission. A table detailing transactions was reportedly provided to investigators, later found during house searches at the contractor’s residence. Jaklin denied any knowledge of the proceedings and stated no house searches were conducted. His lawyer claimed he has always acted legally and professionally. The contractor involved confirmed being questioned but believes the investigation will ultimately find no wrongdoing. Minister Jernej Vrtovec, a

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): The article focuses on allegations of corruption involving a high-profile politician from the NSi party, which is a center-right political entity in Slovenia. The framing emphasizes the accusations against Jaklin, including bribery and money laundering, using terms like 'fictitious contracts' and 'b

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article accurately summarizes the primary source document, mentioning Jaklin's alleged corruption, the involvement of fake contracts, and the potential indictment. It quotes Jaklin's denial through his lawyer and references the SMS exchanges and Excel table found during searches. The content ali

DeloNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 4 dnevi

The article reports that a specialized state prosecutor has initiated an investigation into State Secretary Damijan Jaklin of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, along with the mayor of Velika Polana, over corruption allegations. The investigation centers on accusations of abuse of position, accepting bribes, and money laundering related to the construction of an eight-million-euro section of the Pomurski water pipeline. Jaklin allegedly received over 60,000 euros, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. Investigators claim he colluded in signing over 100,000 euros worth of fake contracts between Serbian construction company MPP Jedinstvo and JHP, which was under state control. Most of the funds reportedly ended up in Jaklin’s hands, while Habjan received a 15% commission. Evidence included SMS messages and a table detailing the transactions, found during home searches. Jaklin faces direct charges of corruption, while Habjan’s legal team has rejected all allegations. A Serbian company director confirmed being interviewed but believes the case will ultimately show no wrongdoing. Minister Jernej Vrtovec has not yet been informed and thus does not have

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): The article frames the corruption allegations against Jaklin and Habjan in a manner that emphasizes their alleged involvement in illegal activities, including bribery and money laundering. It highlights the role of state-controlled entities and the potential misuse of public funds, which aligns with

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article accurately summarizes the primary source document, mentioning Jaklin's alleged corruption, the involvement of fake contracts, and the potential indictment. It quotes Jaklin's denial through his lawyer and references the SMS exchanges and Excel table found during searches. The only minor

RTV Slovenija (MMC)Državni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 4 dnevi

The specialized state prosecution is reportedly investigating Damijan Jaklin, the secretary of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy and mayor of Velika Polana, over alleged corruption related to the construction of an 8 million euro section of the Pomur water pipeline. According to reports by POP TV, Jaklin is accused of abusing his position, accepting bribes, and money laundering through fictitious contracts involving Serbian construction firm MPP Jedinstvo and company JHP led by Jane Habjan. The investigation suggests Jaklin received over 60,000 euros in cash via shell companies, while Habjan allegedly received a 15% commission. A table detailing these transactions was reportedly provided by one of the parties involved and later found during house searches on Habjan’s computer. Jaklin denied any knowledge of the proceedings and stated he has always acted legally and professionally. Habjan claimed all allegations were rejected during the preliminary process. The minister for infrastructure and energy, Jernej Vrtovec, stated he had not been informed of the matter yet.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): The article presents the investigation into a high-ranking official and a member of the NSi party, which is generally considered a center-right political entity in Slovenia. The framing emphasizes potential wrongdoing by a prominent figure within a conservative party, suggesting a critical stance. S

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): Accurate summary of the primary source, includes key details like the alleged corruption involving Jaklin, the 60,000 euro bribe, and the involvement of SDT. Slightly less detailed than the primary source but still faithful.

DnevnikNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 4 dnevi

The article reports on allegations of corruption against Državni sekretar Damijan Jaklin, who was previously the mayor of Velika Polana. According to a report by 24ur, criminal investigators under specialized prosecutors accuse Jaklin of abuse of position, accepting bribes, and money laundering related to the construction of an eight million euro section of the Pomurska water supply system. The accusations include receiving over 60,000 euros, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. Investigators claim that Jaklin facilitated and collaborated in signing over 100,000 euros worth of fictitious contracts between Serbian contractor MPP Jedinstvo and the company JHP Jane Habjan. Most of the funds from these fictitious contracts were funneled into four shell companies specifically set up for this purpose, which ended up in Jaklin’s hands. Evidence includes SMS messages and Excel tables provided by one of the bribe recipients, later found during home searches. Jaklin has denied involvement, claiming he was unaware of any proceedings, while his lawyer stated that without the active participation of whistleblowers, there would be no criminal prosecution. Meanwhile,Š

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): The article presents the allegations against Damijan Jaklin in a manner that emphasizes the seriousness of the corruption charges, citing detailed evidence such as SMS messages and Excel tables. It highlights the involvement of high-profile figures like the minister and the director of a Serbian公司,并

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article accurately reports the allegations against Jaklin, including the fake contracts, the involvement of Jane Habjan, and the potential indictment. It also includes Jaklin's denial through his lawyer and mentions the SMS exchanges and Excel table found during searches. The content matches the

Svet24NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 4 dnevi

Članek poroča, da je Damijan Jaklin, državni sekretar, v središču novega korupcijskega skandala. Osredotočen je na obtožbe, ki vključujejo Jaklina, ki ima pomemben vladni položaj.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek se osredotoča na visokega uradnika, vpletenega v korupcijski škandal, ki je sam po sebi politično obremenjen.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): Provides accurate information from the primary source, including the alleged bribery and involvement of SDT. The title is slightly sensational but the content remains factual and balanced.

Slovenske noviceNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 85pred 4 dnevi

The article reports that a specialized state prosecutor's office is investigating the head of Velika Polana municipality, Damijan Jaklin, along with a state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, over allegations of corruption. The investigation centers on suspected abuse of position, acceptance of bribes, and money laundering related to the construction of an eight million euro section of the Pomurski water pipeline. Jaklin is alleged to have received over 60,000 euros, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. The investigation also involves the case of Dars, where Jaklin was allegedly involved in the signing of over 100,000 euros worth of fictitious contracts between Serbian construction company MPP Jedinstvo and JHP, which was under state control. Most of the funds from these fictitious contracts reportedly ended up in Jaklin’s hands through four shell companies, while Habjan received a 15% commission. Jaklin denied knowledge of any proceedings and stated he has always acted lawfully and professionally. The minister for infrastructure and energy, Jernej Vrtovec, has not yet been informed of the matter.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): The article frames the allegations against Jaklin and others in a manner that emphasizes systemic corruption and misuse of public funds, aligning with left-leaning critiques of political elites and bureaucratic misconduct. While the facts are presented objectively, the focus on corruption within the

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 85): Includes accurate details from the primary source but adds some commentary about Jernej Vrtovec not being informed, which isn't explicitly stated in the original text. Tone leans slightly towards narrative style.

Maribor24NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 85pred 4 dnevi

The article reports that a special state prosecutor's office is investigating the mayor of Velika Polana, Damijan Jaklin, and a state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy over corruption allegations related to a €8 million water pipeline project. Jaklin claims he is unaware of any proceedings and asserts he has always acted lawfully and professionally. The investigation alleges that Jaklin received over €60,000 illegally, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. It also accuses him of colluding with Serbian construction company MPP Jedinstvo and local company JHP under the supervision of Jane Habjan, who allegedly received a 15% commission. Evidence reportedly includes SMS messages and a table detailing the transactions, which were found during home searches. Habjan denied all accusations, stating they were rejected in the preliminary hearing, while a director of the alleged Serbian company confirmed he was interviewed. The minister involved has not yet commented.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): The article frames the allegations against Jaklin and Habjan in a manner that emphasizes their potential wrongdoing, using terms like 'fictitious contracts,' 'illegal receipt of money,' and 'corruption.' While it presents both parties' responses, the focus on the alleged misconduct and the detailed,

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 85): Accurately reports the allegations against Jaklin, including the 60,000 euro bribe and the involvement of SDT. Adds minor details about the Lego bricks, which are present in the primary source but not central to the core facts.

N1 SlovenijaNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 4 dnevi

Članek poroča, da je Damijan Jaklin, pomemben član stranke NSi in državni sekretar na Ministrstvu za infrastrukturo in energijo, pod preiskavo specializiranega državnega tožilstva zaradi obtožb korupcije. Preiskava se osredotoča na obtožbe zlorabe položaja, sprejemanja podkupnin in pranja denarja v zvezi s gradnjo osemmilijonskega odseka vodovodu Pomurski. Po poročilu je Jaklin domnevno prejel več kot 60.000 evrov, večinoma v gotovini, prek fiktivnih pogodb in podružnic. Preiskava kaže, da je bil vključen v ureditev več kot 100.000 evrov vrednih fiktivnih pogodb med srbskim gradbenim podjetjem MPP Jedinstvo in JHP, ki ga je nadzirala Jane Habjan. Večina sredstev iz teh fiktivnih pogodb je končala v rokah Jaklina, medtem ko je Habjan prejel 15%.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek obravnava preiskavo kot legitimen pravni postopek, namenjen visoki politični osebnosti, in poudarja resnost obtožb (korupcija, podkupovanje, pranje denarja).

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 80): The article accurately reflects the corruption allegations against Jaklin, including the role of fictitious contracts and cash payments. It maintains an objective tone but ends abruptly, possibly affecting completeness.

Svet24NeodvisenSredinaDejstva 50Objektivnost 60pred 4 dnevi

Članek obravnava Branka Grimsa, uglednega slovenskega politika, ki se je na evropski ravni soočil z znatno kritiko ali sankcijami.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek prikazuje dogodek dejansko, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani. Rdeči karton je omenjen kot sankcija, vendar ne zagotavlja izrecnega komentarja ali pristranskega jezika, ki bi kazal jasno naklonjenost k podpori ali kritizaciji Grimsa.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 50 · Objektivnost 60): This article is unrelated to the main event and discusses an entirely different topic (Branko Grims' exclusion from a European committee). It provides no relevant information about Jaklin or the corruption allegations. The factuality score is very low because it does not address the subject at all.

+Portal (Portal Plus)NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 30Objektivnost 40pred 4 dnevi

Članek kritizira nekdanjo slovensko premierko Alenko Bratušek, da je domnevno spregledala pomembne obtožbe o korupciji proti lastni stranki. Medtem ko njena komisija preiskuje morebitno nezakonito financiranje stranke Fokus, v članku poudarja, da niso sprejeli nobenega ukrepa glede domnevnega korupcijskega prenosa 2,5 milijona EUR na njen osebni račun iz projekta "druge proge", ki ga je javno razkril nekdanji sekretar gibanja za svobodo. Avtor predlaga, da bi to lahko bil nameren poskus, da bi odvrnili pozornost od teh vprašanj.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek obravnava zadevo kot nameren poskus preusmeritve pozornosti stran od korupcije v Bratušekovi stranki, kar pomeni pomanjkanje odgovornosti.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 30 · Objektivnost 40): Irrelevant to the main event, focuses on unrelated political criticism rather than the corruption allegations against Jaklin. Contains no factual information related to the primary source.