Dlje časa kradli v podjetju: odtujili za 330 tisočakov blaga
V juniju je bila policija v Mariboru opozorjena na ukradeno blago iz skladišča komercialnega podjetja na območju Hoc. Preiskave so pokazale, da so kazniva dejanja v daljšem obdobju zagrešila več posameznikov, vključno z zaposlenimi prizadetega podjetja, ki so sodelovali z dvema drugim osumljenima. Ukradeni predmeti, predvsem tekstili in elektronika, so znašali približno 330.000 evrov. Na podlagi zbranih dokazov so bili osumljenci pridržani. Policija je izvedla več hišnih preiskav v Mariboru in Lendavi v slovenski regiji Gorica ter inšpekcijske preglede drugih prostorov, vključno z skladišči na območju Melj. Med temi preiskavami je bila zasegnuta znatna količina ukradenega blaga, pri čemer je bil nekaj predmetov, za katere se domneva, da izvirajo iz zgoraj navedenih kaznivih dejanj. Eden od osumljencev je imel tudi približno 1 kg rastlinskega materiala konoplje, ki je bil predmet kazenskega postopka za dodatne domnevno povezane kaznive dejanja.
Two Slovenian citizens were attacked in the coastal town of Medulin on the southern coast of Croatia during the early hours of Saturday, sustaining severe facial injuries, according to local police and medical reports. The incidents occurred within the same night, with one attack taking place around 4 am near the beach and another shortly after midnight. Both victims required medical attention, with the 26-year-old suffering multiple fractures to his facial bones, including the nose, cheekbones, and jaw. He has been sent for further evaluation at the University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, where doctors will determine whether surgery is needed. The attacks took place in Medulin, a popular tourist destination on the Istrian peninsula. According to the 26-year-old victim, he and his 23-year-old friend had gone out for drinks and were returning home when they were approached by a group of young men. The assailants reportedly included both males and females, with some of the women trying to intervene by shouting for them to stop. The victim described being struck forcefully in the face by one of the attackers before falling to the ground, and then receiving another blow from another person. His friend suffered a head injury and bruised eye, and had money stolen from his pocket. The 26-year-old victim, who is a professional athlete, told reporters that he did not know the perpetrators and believes the attack might have been motivated by their use of the Slovenian language or an attempt by the attackers to appear tough in front of the women. He emphasized that there were no other witnesses on the beach at the time of the incident, making it difficult to identify the attackers. In addition to this attack, police confirmed that a separate incident involving a 23-year-old man occurred earlier in the night. The man was physically assaulted by a younger male with whom he had unresolved disputes. The attacker targeted him on the beach near a guesthouse in Medulin. The 23-year-old sustained serious injuries but was released from the hospital after receiving medical treatment. Both cases are under investigation by Croatian police, who are examining possible links between the two incidents and gathering witness statements. The exact motives behind the attacks remain unclear, and authorities have not ruled out any potential connection between the two victims. The 26-year-old Slovenian, whose injuries include fractures to the nasal bone, maxillary sinus, orbital floor, and nasal septum, is undergoing further examination. He expressed hope that the perpetrators would be identified and brought to justice, stating that no one should suffer such severe injuries. Meanwhile, in the city of Izola, a different crime unfolded late on Sunday afternoon. Around 1:45 pm, unknown individuals stole cash from a vehicle used for transporting money. The vehicle, believed to be a white Peugeot with Italian license plates, was targeted near one of the shops in Izola. Police responded immediately, setting up roadblocks and deploying a helicopter to assist in the search for suspects. Witnesses reported traffic chaos and long waits on the roads, with some drivers stranded due to the blockades. Authorities urged anyone with information to contact emergency services on the number 113. The stolen amount is estimated to be in the hundreds of thousands of euros, according to unofficial reports. The police have not yet confirmed the identity of the vehicle or the nature of its contents, but it appears to have been operated by security services. Investigations into the robbery are ongoing, with police searching for potential suspects and collecting evidence from the scene. In Medulin, the focus continues to be on identifying those responsible for the violent assault on the two Slovenians. The local police department has stated that they are working closely with Croatian counterparts to ensure all leads are followed. Meanwhile, the 26-year-old victim is recovering from his injuries and preparing for a period of rehabilitation lasting several weeks. As the investigations progress, authorities are emphasizing the importance of public cooperation in providing any relevant information. In both cases, whether related to the assaults or the theft, the public is being asked to come forward with any observations or knowledge that could help bring the perpetrators to justice.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Dva slovenska državljana, stari 26 in 23 let, sta bila napadena v Medulinu na Hrvaškem v zgodnjih jutranjih urah v soboto. 26-letnik je trpel več zlomov obraza, vključno z ličnico, nosom in čeljusti, glede na zdravniško dokumentacijo, ki jo je delil portal. Napadalec je opisal kot mlajše moške med 18 in 24 leti, ki so jih spremljale ženske, ki so jih poskušale ustaviti. Napad se je zgodil okoli 4 zjutraj, ko so se vrnili iz bara. Žrtev verjame, da je bil motiv morda povezan s govorjenjem slovenskega ali poskušal se prikazati kot trdo pred ženskami, vendar ni prepričan. Njegov prijatelj, star 23 let, je bil tudi ranjen, utrpel pretres možganov in poškodbo oči in mu so ukradli denar.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o dveh nasilnih napadih, v katerih so bili vpleteni slovenski državljani v tujini, s poudarkom na pripovedih žrtev in policijskih preiskavah.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports both incidents, including the time, location, and nature of the injuries sustained by the victims. It aligns with the primary source and provides additional context from 24ur without adding unverified claims.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts objectively without emotional language or bias. It provides context while remaining impartial.
V Medulinu na Hrvaškem so v soboto zvečer okrog 16. ure napadli več oseb slovenskega državljana, kar je povzročilo poškodbe obraza, vključno s zlomljenimi kostmi v obrazu, nosu, čeljusti in pod očmi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o dveh ločenih napadih, ne da bi se očitno zavzemala za katero koli politično skupino ali ideologijo.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports both incidents, including the time, location, and nature of the injuries sustained by the victims. It aligns with the primary source and provides additional context from 24ur without adding unverified claims.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts objectively without emotional language or bias. It provides context while remaining impartial.
V Medulinu na južni obali Istre je skupina posameznikov v zgodnjih jutranjih urah v soboto zjutraj napadla dva slovenska državljana. Žrtve, stare 26 in 23 let, so bile med incidentom poškodovane. Po neoficialnih poročilih je 26-letnik utrpel več zlomov obraznih kosti, vključno z ličnico, kosti pod očmi, nosom in čeljustijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o kazenskem incidentu, v katerem so bili vpleteni tuji državljani na Hrvaškem, in se osredotoča na poškodbe, ki so jih utrpeli, in policijsko preiskavo, ki še poteka.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately describes both incidents—the attack on the 23-year-old at the beach and the attack on the two Slovenians at the river—aligning with the primary source. It includes specific details like the time of the attacks and the nature of the injuries.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting the facts without emotional language or bias. It avoids taking sides and focuses on reporting the events as they occurred.
Dva slovenska državljana sta bila v Meduli v Hrvaški v noči med petkom in soboto brutalno napadena. 26-letni moški je utrpel več zlomov na obrazu, vključno z nosom, čeljustjo in ličnicami, 23-letni pa je bil napaden zaradi nerešenih sporov. Oba dogodka sta se zgodila na plaži blizu restavracije, žrtve pa so odpeljali na nadaljnjo medicinsko oceno.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so dogodki predstavljeni kot ločeni zločinski dejanja brez očitnega političnega okvirja. Poroča o fizični škodi, ki je bila povzročena posameznikom, ne da bi se odločil za stran ali pripisal nasilje širšim političnim napetostim.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports both incidents, including the time, location, and nature of the injuries sustained by the victims. It aligns with the primary source and provides additional context from 24ur without adding unverified claims.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts objectively without emotional language or bias. It provides context while remaining impartial.
Približno ob 4. uri zjutraj je skupina moških v Medulinu napadla dva moška. Žrtve, 23-letnik in 26-letnik, so utrpele poškodbe, mlajši moški pa je utrpel hujše rane. 26-letnik je bil sprva hospitaliziran v Puli, kasneje pa izpuščen. Neuradna poročila kažejo, da bo podvržen nadaljnjem pregledu na oddelku za kirurško operacijo čeljust in obraza Univerze v Ljubljani, da se ugotovi, ali je potrebna operacija obraza zaradi več zlomov, vključno s zlomom ličnice, kosti pod očmi, nosom in čeljusti. Policija še vedno preiskuje incident.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na poročilo o zločinu brez političnih implikacij ali obrambe, ki zagotavlja dejanske informacije o napadu in zdravstvenem stanju žrtev brez kakršnega koli ideološkega nagibanja ali pristranskega jezika.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the time (around 4 AM), the victims (two Slovenians aged 23 and 26), and references the primary source (Glas Istre) regarding the hospitalization and release of the 26-year-old. It also mentions the ongoing police investigation, aligning closely with the primary source
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents the information neutrally, avoiding emotional language or bias. It cites the primary source and provides factual details without editorializing or taking sides.
Medjugorje je v isti noči doživel dva ločena napada. Prvi je vključeval 23-letnega moškega, ki je bil hudo ranjen na plaži v bližini gostinske hiše.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o dveh napadih, ne da bi se odkrito zavzemal za kakršno koli politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports both incidents, including the time, location, and nature of the injuries sustained by the victims. It aligns with the primary source and provides additional context from 24ur without adding unverified claims.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts objectively without emotional language or bias. It provides context while remaining impartial.
Slovenske noviceNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 88Objektivnost 90predvčerajšnjim
Policija v Kopru je sporočila, da so neznani storilci ukradli denar iz vozila, ki se je uporabljalo za prevoz denarja v Izo, Slovenija.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o kazenskem dogodku, ne da bi sprejel politično stališče. Osredotočen je na dejanske informacije, ki jih je zagotovila policija, vključno z lokacijo, časom in sprejetimi ukrepi. Ni znakov ideološke pristranskosti ali selektivnega poročanja.
Zakaj dejstva (88): This article matches the factual content of others, providing clear details about the theft and police response. It includes a direct quote from the police, enhancing credibility. No misleading or exaggerated claims are present.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article remains objective, using formal language and avoiding emotionally charged descriptions.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)Državni / javniSredinaDejstva 88Objektivnost 90predvčerajšnjim
20. julija 2026 so okoli 13:45 neznani storilci ukradli denar iz vozila za prevoz denarja v bližini ene od trgovin v Izoli.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o zločinu, v katerem je bil ukraden denar iz vozila za prevoz denarja. V njem so navedeni dejanski podatki o incidentu, vključno s časom, lokacijo in odzivom policije.
Zakaj dejstva (88): This article aligns closely with the primary source information about the theft and police actions. It mentions the time, location, and police measures taken, matching other reports. It does not introduce unverified claims beyond what is commonly reported in such incidents.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the situation without emotional language or editorializing. It focuses solely on the facts as relayed by the police.
V eni od trgovin v Izoli so neznani storilci ukradli denar iz vozila, ki se je uporabljalo za prevoz denarja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o zločinu, ne da bi sprejel jasno ideološko stališče. Predstavlja dejanske podatke o tatvi, policijskem odzivu in poziva k javni pomoči.
Zakaj dejstva (87): The article accurately reflects the event, including the time, location, and police actions. It includes a photograph caption and quotes from the police, which are typical in such reports. No conflicting information is presented.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The tone is neutral, with no indication of bias or preference towards any party involved.
Policija v Kopru je ob 13:45 prejela poročilo, da so neznani storilci ukradli denar iz vozila, ki se je uporabljalo za prevoz denarja v bližini trgovine v Izoli.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanski prikaz kaznivega dejanja brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja. Osredotočen je na policijski odziv in preiskovalna prizadevanja, ne da bi se postavil na stran ali spodbujal posebne politične agende.
Zakaj dejstva (86): The article presents the incident and police actions accurately, with no major deviations from other reports. It includes a call for public assistance, which is standard in such cases. Minor variations in phrasing do not affect overall accuracy.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The tone is consistently neutral, focusing on informing readers rather than influencing opinion.
V Izoli v Sloveniji so tatovi ukradli denar iz vozila za prevoz denarja. Policija je postavila cestne ovire in helikopter išče osumljence. Neuradna poročila kažejo, da so storilec pobegnili v belem Peugeotu z italijanskimi registrskimi tablicami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek je dejanski opis kaznivega dejanja, ki vključuje ukrepe kazenskega pregona, in ne kaže jasnega ideološkega okvirja ali pristranskega jezika.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports the incident of a cash heist from a money transport vehicle in Izo, including police response with roadblocks and helicopter involvement. It cites official sources like the police and provides details consistent with other articles. However, it includes some informal s
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The tone remains neutral, focusing on reporting facts without bias. The article avoids taking sides or expressing personal opinions, maintaining an objective stance throughout.
V mestu Izola so neznani storilci oropali denar iz vozila, ki se uporablja za prevoz denarja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko poročilo o kazenskem dogodku brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports the incident accurately, mentioning the police response and the use of a helicopter. It includes a note about the unofficial nature of some information, which adds transparency. Minor inconsistencies with other reports are minor and do not impact overall accuracy.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a balanced approach, presenting the facts without emotional or biased language.
Moškega je okrog štirih zjutraj v bližini njegovega stanovanja v Medulinu brutalno napadlo pet mladih ljudi. Napadalci so ga večkrat udarili v obraz, zaradi česar je utrpel hude poškodbe, vključno s zlomi na obraznih kosteh in nosu. Žrtev je opisala dogodek in navedla, da ne pozna storilcev in jih ni videla v lokalnem baru. Obe žrtvi, stari 23 in 26 let, sta bili šokirani in naslednji dan iskali zdravniško pomoč. Policija je preiskala dogodek, kazenski postopek pa poteka, medtem ko oblasti še naprej zbirajo informacije.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanski opis nasilnega zločina brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja. Osredotočen je na sam incident, poškodbe in tekočo preiskavo, ne da bi se postavljal na eno stran ali promoviral posebne politične agende.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on a physical assault in Medulin involving a Slovenian man who was attacked by two young men. It provides details from the victim's account, including the location, time, and nature of the attack. The information aligns with the cross-source consensus as no conflicting accounts a
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the incident from the perspective of the victim, using emotionally charged language such as 'po brutalnem napadu' and 'šokirana.' While it does not explicitly take sides, the focus on the victim's experience may lean towards sympathy, reducing objectivity.
26-letni slovenski državljan je bil hudo ranjen med napadom več posameznikov na obali Medulina okoli polnoči v soboto. Po neoficialnih poročilih je utrpel več zlomov obraznih kosti, vključno z ličnico, kosti pod očmi, nosom in čeljustijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so navedeni dejanski podatki o dveh nasilnih napadih, v katerih so bili vpleteni slovenski državljani v Medulinu, brez očitnega ideološkega okvira ali pristranskega jezika.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article closely aligns with the primary source document, providing accurate information about both incidents involving the 23-year-old man and the two Slovenian nationals. It references the police report and provides specific details about the injuries without adding unverified claims. It also
Zakaj objektivnost (70): While the article remains largely factual, there is a slight bias in the way it emphasizes the severity of the injuries, particularly mentioning 'več zlomov obraznih kosti' without confirming this through official sources. The phrasing 'po neuradnih informacijah' suggests reliance on unofficial sour
V Izoli so iz vozila za prevoz denarja ukradli precejšen znesek gotovine, ocenjen na več kot 100.000 evrov. Incident je vključeval roparje, ki so uporabili helikopter za olajšanje kraje, kar je poudarilo vpletenost elementov organiziranega kriminala.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dogodek dejansko, brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja. Ne zavzema stališča o političnih posledicah ropa, niti ne podpira nobene posebne skupine ali ideologije. Osredotočen je na sam zločin in potrebo po izboljšanju varnosti, ne pa na kakršne koli politike.
Zakaj dejstva (84): This article introduces a specific claim about the amount stolen (over 100,000 euros), which is not confirmed by other sources. While plausible, it lacks verification. Other details match the primary source and other articles.
Zakaj objektivnost (88): There is a slight lean toward sensationalism with the mention of 'velik plen' and 'več sto tisoč evrov,' though it remains within journalistic bounds.
V Medulinu v Sloveniji je skupina neznanih oseb ponoči fizično napadla dva moška. Prvi incident je bil 23-letni moški, ki je bil resno poškodovan po napadu na plaži v bližini gostinske hiše okoli 2:30 zjutraj. Kasneje so ga izpustili iz bolnišnice. Kasneje tisto jutro, okoli 4 zjutraj, je druga skupina napadla dva slovenska državljana, starega 23 in 26 let, čeprav obseg njihovih poškodb ostaja nejasen. Policija preiskuje oba dogodka, ki naj bi bila povezana s stalnimi spopadi med posamezniki.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o dveh ločenih napadih, ne da bi se odkrito zavzemal za kakršno koli politično stališče. Poroča o policijski preiskavi in pogojih žrtev, ne da bi komentirala širša družbena vprašanja ali politične posledice.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article reflects the primary source document accurately, detailing both assaults and referencing the police investigation. It does not add new information beyond what was reported by the primary source. It also mentions the 23-year-old man’s injury and release from the hospital, which aligns wit
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article maintains a neutral tone overall but uses slightly emotive language when describing the attacks, such as 'napadli dva Slovenca,' which could imply a sense of injustice. While not overtly biased, the language leans toward sympathy for the victims.
V Meduli je bila oseba napadena in utrpela hude poškodbe. Incident se je zgodil v Sloveniji, čeprav v naslovu niso navedli posebnih podrobnosti o storilcu, motivu ali trenutnem statusu žrtve.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o kazenskem dogodku, vendar ga ne prikazuje skozi politično lečo. Ni znakov ideološkega nagibanja ali poudarka na stranskih pogledih. Osredotočenost ostaja na dejanski dogodek brez komentarja, ki bi nakazoval levi ali desni pogled.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article is extremely brief and lacks specific details about the incident, such as the time, location, or nature of the injuries. It does not reference any sources or provide enough context to verify the accuracy of the claim.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article is overly vague and lacks any contextual or descriptive elements. Its neutrality cannot be assessed due to the lack of content and detail.
Slovenske noviceNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 60Objektivnost 50včeraj
Trije moški iz Bosne in Hercegovine, stari 19, 20 in 21 let, so bili aretirani s strani policije v Mariboru zaradi domnevnih šestih kaznivih dejanj, vključno z dvema primeroma kraje, dvema primeroma lahke telesne poškodbe, enim primerom napada in poskusom izsiljevanja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanski opis kazenske preiskave, ki vključuje tuje državljane in domače žrtve, s poudarkom na pravnih postopkih in naravi storjenih kaznivih dejanj.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article references an unrelated incident involving three Bosnian citizens in Maribor, not the attack in Medulin described in the primary source. It contains details about fabricated profiles and phone contracts that are not mentioned in the primary document. The facts presented are inaccurate an
Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'izdajali za mlado žensko' (pretending to be a young woman) and 'ujeli Slovence v past' (caught Slovenians in a trap), suggesting a narrative of deception and entrapment. This framing is biased and lacks neutrality.
Trije državljani Bosne in Hercegovine, stari 19, 20 in 21 let, so bili prejšnji teden aretirani na podlagi kazenskega zakonika zaradi sumnje, da so bili vpleteni v šest kaznivih dejanj, vključno z dvema primeroma kraje, dvema primeroma manjšega telesnega poškodb, enim primerom napada in poskusa izsiljevanja. Po poročilih policije je bil eden od osumljencev prej obravnavan zaradi podobnih kaznivih dejanj.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije v zvezi s kazensko preiskavo, v kateri so bili vpleteni posamezniki, ki so za storitev kaznivih dejanj uporabljali goljufijo.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article discusses an entirely different incident involving three Bosnian citizens in Maribor, not the attack in Medulin described in the primary source. It contains details about fabricated profiles and phone contracts that are not mentioned in the primary document. The facts presented are inacc
Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'izdajali za mlado žensko' (pretending to be a young woman) and 'ujeli Slovence v past' (caught Slovenians in a trap), suggesting a narrative of deception and entrapment. This framing is biased and lacks neutrality.
22. julija 2026, okrog 13. ure, je policija v Ljubljani bila opozorjena na kaznivo dejanje, ki je vključevalo krajo denarja iz vozila za prevoz gotovine na območju Most. Po poročilih 24ur.com so neznani storilci domnevno oropali vozilo za prevoz gotovine. Policija je razporedila več patruljnih enot za preiskavo incidenta in policijski helikopter je izvajal zračni nadzor.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko poročilo o kazenski preiskavi brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Slovenia
