Dinamo je deseta ekipa po možnosti, da bo šla naprej, to so potencialni tekmeci v tekmi v Ligi prvakov
Članek razpravlja o verjetnosti, da bo Hajduk Split napredoval še naprej v kvalifikacijah za Ligo prvakov, s poudarkom na potencialnih nasprotnikih v odbojnem krogu. Po tem, ko je v prvi tekmi v prvem dvoboju z švicarsko ekipo Thun, je bil Hajduk opredeljen kot deseta najbolj verjetna ekipa za napredovanje.
Hajduk faced a dramatic turn in their Europa League qualifying tie against Cypriot side Pafos during the first half of their return leg in Limassol. The visitors had secured a 2:0 lead in the first match at Poljud, with goals from Michele Šego and Dario Melnjak. However, Pafos managed to equalize just before halftime, scoring through a stunning strike from Guga in the 40th minute. This goal brought the aggregate score to 2:1 in favor of Hajduk, but left the Split-based team under pressure to maintain their advantage. The match began with Hajduk dominating possession and creating chances, but Pafos's defense held firm until the pivotal moment. In the 40th minute, Guga received the ball around 20 meters from goal after a quick counterattack and fired a powerful shot into the top corner, leaving Hajduk goalkeeper Silić with no chance. The goal was a wake-up call for the Croatian side, who had previously looked comfortable in control of the game. Despite the setback, Hajduk continued to push forward, maintaining their attacking intent throughout the first half. They created several opportunities, including a shot from Pukštas that was saved by Pafos goalkeeper Majecki. However, the home side's resilience and tactical discipline were evident, particularly in their ability to nullify Hajduk’s threats and capitalize on set pieces. As the first half drew to a close, referee Paweł Raczkowski added three minutes of stoppage time. During this period, Pafos's Rodrigues was shown a yellow card for a reckless challenge on Dalisson. Meanwhile, Hajduk made a substitution, bringing on Dragomir for the injured Jaja, who had suffered a knee injury earlier in the match. The second half saw Hajduk attempt to regain control, but Pafos remained composed and dangerous on the break. Their physicality and pace posed challenges for the Croatian side, which struggled to maintain consistent possession. Despite these difficulties, Hajduk's defensive organization and midfield work rate kept them in contention for the aggregate lead. The match concluded with Hajduk still holding a 2:1 advantage, setting up a crucial second leg in Split. If they can secure another win or a draw, they will advance to the third qualifying round of the Europa League, facing Austrian side Red Bull Salzburg. Failure to do so would see them drop into the Conference League qualifiers against the winner of the Dinamo Tbilisi and Žalgiris Vilnius tie. Meanwhile, Dinamo Zagreb faced their own dramatic encounter in the Champions League qualifiers against Swiss side Thun. After a tense first leg that ended in a 1:1 draw, the Croatian champions found themselves trailing 0:2 early in the second leg at Maksimir. However, a red card for Thun's Marc Bürki in the 67th minute turned the tide. Dinamo responded with two goals from Dion Drena Beljo and Lukas Kačavenda to force extra time. In the 112th minute, Moris Valinčić scored the decisive goal, securing a 3:2 victory and a place in the third qualifying round. Valinčić's goal was a defining moment for Dinamo, who had struggled in the opening exchanges but showed resilience and composure in the latter stages. His performance earned praise from both fans and analysts, highlighting his role in the team's successful comeback. The result ensured Dinamo's ninth consecutive European campaign, keeping them in the Europa League rather than the Conference League. Looking ahead, Dinamo faces a tough test against the winner of the KÍ Klaksvík and Žalgiris Vilnius tie. According to statistical projections, Dinamo is heavily favored to progress, with an 85% probability of advancing based on their squad strength and financial resources compared to their opponents. In contrast, Hajduk's path to the Europa League is far from certain. Their ability to maintain their lead in the return leg will determine whether they continue their continental journey or face a tougher route through the Conference League. Both teams have high stakes in their respective matches, with the outcomes likely to shape their seasons significantly.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Hajduk Split, ki igra v Limassolu proti ciprskemu klubu Pafosu, ima prednost od 2:0 po prvi tekmi 2. predšolske evropske lige. V drugi polovici, so Ciparci uspešno vrnili neizvjesnost v tekmi po tem, ko je Guga ustvaril 1:0 za Pafos. Čeprav ima Hajduk prednost, vendar še ni končana, bo zmagovalec srečal Avstrijance iz Red Bull Salzburga v tretji predšolski evropski ligi, ki pa bo poražena v nadaljevanju v Konferencijski ligi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o nogometni tekmi brez kakršnih koli političnih implikacij.
Zakaj dejstva (100): The article faithfully represents the primary source document, accurately reporting the match details, scoreline (2:1 overall), and the consequences for both teams in the competition. All information matches the official report.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article presents the information objectively, focusing on the match events without taking sides or using emotive language. It maintains a balanced perspective throughout.
Hajduk Split, gostitelj stadiona Poljud, je v prvem srečanju z Ciperom Pafosu z 2:0 zmagal v drugi evropski tekmi. Golovi so ustvarili Michele Šega in Dario Melnjak, kar je omogočilo prehod v naslednji krog.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o športni tekmi brez kakršnih koli političnih implikacij.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately provides information about the upcoming match between Hajduk and Pafos, including the expected lineup and broadcast details. It aligns closely with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article is entirely neutral and objective, providing factual information about the match without expressing any personal opinions or biases.
Hajduk Split in Pafos sta v drugi kvalifikacijski rundi Lige Evrope v Limassolu. Hajduk je imel prednost 2:0 v prvi tekmi, Pafos pa ni uspel zadeti enega gola v prvi polustani. Igralec Pafosa Guga je zadel gol v 40. minuti, kar je v tistem trenutku omogočilo prednost Pafosu, vendar je Hajduk še vedno vodil v končnem rezultatu 2:1. Tekma bo trajala tri minute in se bo nadaljevala v treh kvalifikacijskih rundih.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o športni tekmi brez kakršnih koli političnih implikacij.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the match details from the primary source, including the scoreline (2:1 overall), the teams involved, and the implications for the competition. It provides live updates that align with the official report.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, focusing on factual reporting of the match events without editorializing or showing bias towards either team.
Hajduk Split je v prvi tekmi v skupinski fazi Lige Evrope zmagala s Ciperskim Pafosom 2-0, s čimer je zagotovila pomemben korak v smeri napredovanja v naslednji krog. Zmaga se je zgodila na Poljudskem stadionu pred 27.752 gledalci. Hajduk je prevzel vodstvo v 56. minuti z golom Michela Šegala iz prostega udarca, ki mu je sledil Dario Melnjak, ki je zadal osem minut kasneje. Ta zmaga je pritegnila pozornost v Srbiji, ker je Pafos predhodno premagal Rdečo zvezdo Beograd v prejšnjem sezonu v oddaji za kvalifikacije za Ligo prvakov. Srbijski mediji, kot sta B92 in Telegraf, so poudarjali rezultat, pri čemer je B92 navedel, da je Hajduk "vprašal o krvi Rdeče zvezde", medtem ko je Telegraf poudaril, da je Pafos utrpel enega najhujših porazov na Rdečo zvezdo v sezoni.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na športni dogodek in ne vključuje politično nabitih tem.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the match details and the significance of the win for Hajduk, citing specific sources from Serbian media. It aligns with the primary source regarding the match outcome and context.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral tone while providing context about the match's impact on regional football, avoiding overt bias or emotional language.
Hajduk Split je v prvi tekmi prvenstva Lige Evrope na stadionu Poljud z 2:0 premagal kiparski klub Pafos. V drugem polčasu sta golovale Mikele Šego in Dario Melnjak. Pafos je v srbskih nogometnih krogih znan po tem, da je v prejšnjih sezonah med kvalifikacijami za Ligo prvakov izločil Rdečo zvezdo Beograd, s čimer je dosegel enega najbolj bolečih porazov v tej sezoni. Letos pa se je Pafos soočil z izločitvijo v začetku kvalifikacij za Ligo Evrope, potem ko je utrpel poraz v Splitu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na športni dogodek brez neposrednih političnih posledic.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reflects the match details from the primary source, including the score, goalscorers, and referee decisions. It provides a detailed account of the game and the referee's controversial calls.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a largely neutral tone, focusing on the referee's performance and the impact of his decisions. It avoids taking sides and presents the facts objectively.
Novi listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 9 dnevi
Hajduk Split, v prvem srečanju 2. predšolske evropske lige, je na stadionu Poljud u Splitu zmagala Ciparski Pafos 2-0. Pobeda je Hajduku omogočila narediti velik korak proti plasmanu v naslednjem krogu tekmovanja. Po preskočenju Žilina je Hajduk zadel ždrijebu s Pafosom. Domači je povedal v 56. minuti golom Michelea Šege iz svobodne udarca, in Dario Melnjak je povisio prednost v 64. minuti. Hajduk je že v petih minutah imel lepo priložnost, vendar je hotel očistiti. V končni prvi dijeli domači je imel še eno priložnost, vendar je Šegoasnio.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o nogometni tekmi med Hajduk Splitom in Pafosom v kvalifikacijah za Ligo Evrope.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the match details and highlights the goal by Michele Šego, aligning with the primary source. It provides additional context about the match atmosphere and significance.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral tone while emphasizing the importance of the goal and the match outcome, avoiding overt bias or emotional language.
Dinamo Zagreb iskrio epski preokret protiv švicarskog kluba Thuna u drugem kolu kvalifikacija za Ligu prvaka, osvojivši 3-2 na Maksimiru i 4-3 u ukupnom poretku. Zmagal je donio Moris Valinčić, ki je snažnim pogotkom u 112. minuti postavio prvi cilj za Dinamo. Igralec je istaknuo važnost ekipne saradnje i priznatio teškoće na početku utakmice, ali je istaknuo da je igrali bolju igru u drugem dijelu. Dinamo će u idučem kolu igrovati protiv pobjedenih susreta izmeđukvika i Kauno Žalisa, ki vodi Željko Sopić, prethodni trener HNL kluba.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Tematika priče nije politička, već sportska, pa je politička nagnutost blizu nule.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports Valinčić's goal, the match result, and the context of the European qualification. It provides direct quotes from Valinčić and includes relevant background information about the next opponent. All factual claims align with the cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone by focusing on Valinčić's personal reflections and the team's achievement. It avoids taking sides between the teams and presents the information objectively.
Dinamo Zagreb je napredoval v tretji krog kvalifikacij za Ligo prvakov, ko je v dodatnem času na stadionu Maksimir porazil švicarski klub Thun s 3-2.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na športno tekmo med dvema nogometnima kluboma, ne omenja politike, uradnikov ali javne politike.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article provides precise details about the match, including scores, goal scorers, and player ratings. These facts are consistent with those found in other articles, making it highly reliable in terms of factual accuracy.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): While the article presents a clear narrative of the match and includes player evaluations, it occasionally uses subjective language when rating players, such as 'spektakularnom solo akcijom' (spectacular solo action), which introduces a slight bias in favor of certain players.
Članek poroča o nogometni tekmi, v kateri je Hajduk Split v prvi tekmi kvalifikacij za Ligo Evrope z 2:0 premagal Pafos.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja preprosto poročilo o športnem dogodku brez kakršnih koli političnih implikacij. Osredotočen je izključno na izid igre, nastop igralcev in ne zavzema stališča ali okvirja vsebine na pristranski način.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the match result (2-0 win for Hajduk) and provides correct details about the scorers and match context. It includes additional information about the goal scoring moments that align with general knowledge about the match.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone while describing the match and goal scoring moments. It focuses on factual reporting without showing clear preference for either team, though it highlights Hajduk's performance positively.
V drugem krogu kvalifikacij za Ligo prvakov se je hrvaški klub Dinamo Zagreb srečal s švicarsko stranko Thun ob 20. uri po lokalnem času. Po prvem polčasu je Dinamo izgubil z 1:0 zaradi gola, ki ga je v 20. minuti zadal Thunov napadalec Brighton Labeau.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na športni dogodek, zlasti na nogometno tekmo med dvema kluboma v kvalifikacijah za Ligo prvakov UEFA.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the match details including the score (1-0), the goal scorer (Brighton Labeau), and the time (20th minute). It also provides updates on the match progress and player actions.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, focusing on match events and player performances without showing strong bias toward either team.
V članku se poroča o tekmi med Dinamo Zagreb in švicarsko klub Thun v kvalifikacijah za Ligo prvakov UEFA. Novinarka Donna Diana Prćić je govorila izključno z pomočnikom trenerja Sandrom Bloudekom, ki je zagotovil vpogled v strategijo ekipe in izbiro igralcev. Bloudek je omenil, da napadalca Bakrarja niso vključili v začetno sestavo, čeprav je bilo govoric, da bi lahko kmalu zapustil klub. Potrdil je, da je ekipa izbrala tri močne igralce za desno krilo, tako da je taktično izbrala Lisico. Bloudek je tudi razpravljal o vrnitvi Oršića v Dinamo in izrazil zaupanje v njegovo pripravljenost za nastop. Glede pogojev tekme v Thunu, ki poteka na umetnem travi, je Bloudek dejal, da polje izpolnjuje standarde in da bosta obe ekipi igrali pod podobnimi pogoji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na športni dogodek in ne vključuje politično nabitih tem, kot so vlada, volitve ali javna politika.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the match details including the score (1-0), the goal scorer (Brighton Labeau), and the time (20th minute). It also includes statements from Dinamo's assistant coach regarding the team's approach.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains largely neutral, presenting facts and quotes from the assistant coach without showing strong bias toward either team.
Dinamo Zagreb je zmagal z 3:2 v drugem krogu kvalifikacije za prvo ligo, s čimer je zagotovil minimalno ligaško fazo Konferencijske lige. Tekma je bila zelo dinamična, s Thunu vodil 2:0 po 22. minuti, medtem ko je Dinamo izjednačil v 74. in 78. minuti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Vijest nije politička, već sportska, pa je politička nagnutost blizu nula. Zato se ne more določiti daleč. Vijest daje objektivne informacije o športnih dogodkih brez očitnega tujega okreta.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the match outcome, key players involved, and Valinčić's post-match interview. It includes specific details like the score progression and match timeline that align with other sources. The content is factually sound and consistent with the cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article remains mostly neutral in its reporting while highlighting Valinčić's personal feelings about the win. It avoids strong bias but still emphasizes the significance of the victory for Dinamo.
Hajduk Split, domač v prvem srečanju 2. predšolske evropske lige, je na stadionu Poljud v Zagrebu 2-0 premagal Ciparski Pafos. Golovi so ustvarili Michele Šega in Dario Melnjak, kar je Hajduku omogočilo, da je imel možnosti za prehod v tretji krog tekmovanja več kot 74%.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku se obravnava športna tekma in s tem povezane statistične verjetnosti, ki niso politično nabit. Vsebina se osredotoča na športne dosežke in napredovanje na turnirju, ne pa na politična vprašanja, politike ali družbene razprave.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the match outcome and key details from the primary source including the score, goalscorers, and implications for the next round. It aligns closely with the official document's information.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article maintains a neutral and objective tone throughout, focusing on factual reporting without showing bias towards either team. It presents the information clearly and without emotional language.
V članku so razpravljali o morebitnih spremembah domače prednosti za Hajduk Split, če bodo napredovali mimo Pafosa v Ligi Evrope. Hajduk je na domačem igrišču zmagala z Pafosom 2-0, s čimer je zagotovila ugoden položaj za povratno tekmo proti Cipru. V članku je pojasnjeno, da bi zaradi tega, ker se je UEFA Superpokal 12. avgusta odvijal na Salzburškem stadionu, lahko prišlo do spremembe domače prednosti za tretji krog. To bi lahko pomenilo, da bi moral Salzburg igrati svojo tekmo proti Hajduku ali Pafosu takoj po Superpokalu, kar bi povzročilo logistične izzive in morda zamenjavo domačih lokacij. V članku so poudarjene posledice take spremembe za oba.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na logistiko in odločitve o urniku v nogometnih tekmovanjih, ki se štejejo za apolitične.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately describes the match atmosphere and key moments from the primary source, including the goals scored and the crowd's reaction. It provides a comprehensive overview of the game.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the match experience and fan engagement without showing bias towards either team.
V nogometni tekmi med Pafosom in Hajduk Splitom je Pafos v 40. minuti prevzel vodstvo s golom Rodrigueza. Končni rezultat je bil 1-0 za Pafosa po dodatnem času, skupni rezultat pa je bil 1-2. Hajduk je kljub porazu še vedno imel številčno prednost zaradi zamenjav.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o športnem dogodku, ne da bi sprejel politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the match details and scoreline (2:1 overall) as per the primary source. However, it adds some commentary about the game flow and player performances that aren't explicitly stated in the official report.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains mostly objective but includes some analysis of the game dynamics, which could be seen as slightly interpretive rather than purely factual.
NK Dinamo Zagreb je zagotovil deveto uzastopnu evropsku jesen nakon dramatične pobjede protiv Thuna u trećem pretkolu kvalifikacija za Ligu prvaka. Ta uspeh omogoča klupi da se kvalificira za najmanj nastup u Konferencijskoj ligi. Sljedeća prepreka za Dinamo je pobjednik međusobnog dvoboja između prvaka Farskih Otoka, KÍ Klaksvíka i litvanskog Kauno Žalgirisa. Prvi susret tih momčadi završio je bez pogodaka, pa će odluka o Dinamovom protivniku biti donesena u uzvratnoj utakmici u Litvi. Kauno Žaliss vodi bivši trener Žama Dineljko Sopišić, ki je Kvík postal eno od ugodnijih izvodov evropskih kvalifikacij.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Športne teme niso usmerjene v politično vsebino. Njihovi viri so najverjetneje nevtralni, saj se nanašajo na rezultate razporejenih tekem v evropskih tekmovanjih.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately summarizes the match outcome (3-2 win in extra time) and provides correct contextual information about Dinamo’s qualification for the third round and their upcoming opponent. It aligns closely with the primary source document and does not introduce any incorrect or exaggerated
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on factual reporting of the match result and future implications. It avoids taking sides or using emotionally charged language, presenting the information objectively without editorializing.
Članek poroča o intervjuju po tekmi z Ricardom Sá Pintojem, trenerjem Pafosa, po porazu s 2:0 pred Hajdukom Splitom v drugem krogu kvalifikacijskih tekem za Ligo Evrope. Sá Pinto je kritiziral izid tekme in dejal, da je bil rezultat nepošten in da bi lahko le Messi zadal tak gol.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na športni dogodek in ne vključuje politično nabitih tem, kot so vlada, volitve ali javna politika.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the match details and includes direct quotes from the Pafos coach that align with the primary source. It provides additional context about the team's preparation and strategy.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains mostly objective but includes some interpretation of the coach's comments and the team's approach to the match.
Članek razpravlja o verjetnosti, da bo Hajduk Split napredoval še naprej v kvalifikacijah za Ligo prvakov, s poudarkom na potencialnih nasprotnikih v odbojnem krogu. Po tem, ko je v prvi tekmi v prvem dvoboju z švicarsko ekipo Thun, je bil Hajduk opredeljen kot deseta najbolj verjetna ekipa za napredovanje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni dejanski podatki in napovedi, ki se nanašajo na nogometne tekme in napredovanje turnirjev brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports on Michele Šego's goal against Pafos and his comments about the team's performance. It doesn't mention Roko Brajković's injury but provides factual information about the match outcome.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a balanced tone while quoting Šego's statements. It avoids taking sides but includes some subjective language describing the team's performance.
Hrvaški prvak Dinamo Zagreb je lani zvečer preživel dramatično tekmo proti švicarski klubi Thuna na stadionu v Maksimiru, uspešno predokrenoval rezultat in zagotovil mesto v tretji fazi Prve lige. Po številni prednosti Thune (0:2), je Dinamo v 74. minuti postigao prvi gol, nato še en v 78., kar je moralo narediti. V proizvodnji, je Dinamo pobijedio 3:2 po gol Morisa Valinčića v 112. minuti. Sada Dinamo čaka rezultat med KÍ Kvíko in Kauno Žalgirisa, ki bo določil njegove naslednike v tretji fazi Prve lige.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Tematizira športne tekme in kvalifikacije, ki niso politično kontroverzne. Stav je osrednji jer se ne poudarja niti ena stran, a tekst nevtralen opisuje dogajanje brez političnega okreta.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article provides a clear and accurate summary of the match, including key moments, goals, and progression through the qualifiers. It matches the primary source document in reporting the scoreline, timing of events, and the result. There is no significant deviation from the facts presented in Bl
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone remains relatively neutral, focusing on the match outcome and progression without overt bias. While there is some emphasis on Dinamo's dramatic recovery, it does not introduce strong emotional language or one-sided framing compared to the first article.
Dinamo Zagreb je zmagal 3-2 nad švicarsko ekipo Thun u produžetku, postavljen na 3. mesto v pretkolo ligi. Tekma, ki se je odigrala na stadionu Maksimir, je bila dramatična, s številnimi glavnimi cilji in izhodom igralcev. Bivši napadač Diname in trenutni trener kluba Karlovca, Igor Pamić, je dal podroben komentar o tekmi za Net.hr.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek obravnava nogometno tekmo in se osredotoča na taktično analizo in igranje igralcev, ne pa na politična vprašanja.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately describes the match events including goals, red cards, and the eventual scoreline. It cites Igor Pamić's comments but presents them as his personal opinion rather than objective facts. The information matches the general consensus found in other sources.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article shows clear bias in favor of Dinamo, emphasizing their quality over Thun despite the loss. The tone is more critical of Thun and less balanced in its portrayal of both teams' performances.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Croatia
