Poraženi predsedniški kandidat Flávio Bolsonaro in njegova družina so po begu iz Brazilije prispeli v Miami

Senator Flávio Bolsonaro arrived in Miami on Wednesday following a multi-country journey that began after he refused to concede Brazil’s presidential election to incumbent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The 45-year-old senator, accompanied by his wife and two daughters, landed at Opa Locka Executive Airport shortly after 9:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time. His departure from Brazil occurred despite a court order requiring him to surrender his regular and diplomatic passports, a mandate that expired at noon on Tuesday. The U.S. Department of State confirmed that visas were issued for Bolsonaro and his family, facilitating their entry into the United States. The sequence of events began on Sunday when Lula secured a fourth term in office, winning 51.8 percent of the vote against Bolsonaro’s 48.2 percent. The margin of victory was approximately 4.4 million votes. Hours after the results were finalized, Justice Alexandre de Moraes of Brazil’s Supreme Federal Tribunal ordered Bolsonaro to hand over his passports. This directive was linked to an ongoing investigation involving alleged money laundering, tax evasion, and corruption related to an online gambling scheme. Bolsonaro initially stated he intended to comply with the order and defend himself against what he termed an intimidation tactic. However, he later claimed the order was motivated by a suggestion from his brother, Eduardo Bolsonaro, who resides in the United States, that Flávio should leave the country if he lost. Argentine immigration authorities confirmed that Bolsonaro entered Argentina by land on Tuesday night using an Italian passport. He subsequently boarded a private charter plane that flew to Guayaquil, Ecuador, landing there around 4:00 a.m. local time. The aircraft then departed minutes later for Miami. Before leaving Brazil, Bolsonaro had been out of public view since Tuesday morning, issuing only brief social media updates. Upon arrival in Florida, he released a lengthy letter on social media, which he later deleted and revised twice. In the initial version, he identified himself as the “president-elect” of Brazil. In subsequent edits, he removed that title, instead addressing the Brazilian people and the international community as the “leader” of Brazil. In the final text of the letter, Bolsonaro rejected the election outcome, labeling it “repugnant electoral fraud.” He specifically criticized the decision by Justice Cristiano Zanin to extend voting hours by two days in certain regions, arguing this violated constitutional norms and justified annulling the Lula-Alckmin ticket. Zanin, who served as Lula’s personal defense attorney before joining the Supreme Court, had extended voting until 7:00 p.m. in response to transportation complaints in the Northeast, Lula’s traditional stronghold. Most polling stations had closed by the standard 5:00 p.m. deadline, but technical constraints prevented reopened stations from accepting new ballots once closed. Bolsonaro compared his situation to historical figures including French General Charles de Gaulle, Cuban revolutionary José Martí, and Venezuelan politician María Corina Machado. He expressed gratitude to Argentine President Javier Milei and U.S. President Donald Trump for their support. Trump, who has a close relationship with the Bolsonaro family, publicly questioned the integrity of the Brazilian election. Speaking at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, Trump described the election as “really strange” and “terrible,” stating without providing specific evidence that it appeared “rigged.” He characterized Bolsonaro and his family as “fine people” and indicated approval of their presence in the United States. The U.S. President has previously clashed with Lula over trade policies and has echoed Bolsonaro family allegations that the 2022 conviction of former President Jair Bolsonaro was a political witch hunt. Reactions within Brazil have been sharply divided. President Lula addressed supporters outside the presidential residence in Brasília, stating that Bolsonaro’s departure was “shameful.” Lula argued that Bolsonaro should have remained in Brazil to prove the accusations against him were false. “This act of leaving Brazil is shameful,” Lula said. Conversely, Argentine President Javier Milei’s spokesperson, Juan Pablo Carreira, stated that the Argentine administration had rescued Bolsonaro from “the claws of communism.” Public sentiment in Rio de Janeiro mirrored this split; some residents viewed the departure as a logical response to severe political persecution, while others condemned it as an act of cowardice. Criticism has also emerged from within Bolsonaro’s own political coalition. Valdemar Costa Neto, chairman of the Liberal Party, stated that party members had not approved the letter released by the senator. Costa Neto noted that even Jair Bolsonaro, who is serving a 27-year prison sentence under house arrest for plotting an insurrection, was unaware of his son’s plans to flee. Former campaign coordinator Rogério Marinho rejected the fraud allegations, noting that no evidence had been presented to support the claims. Tarcísio de Freitas, Governor of São Paulo and a key ally, urged respect for the election results, acknowledging Bolsonaro’s frustration but emphasizing the need to move forward. Bolsonaro faces serious legal jeopardy in Brazil beyond the immediate election dispute. The Supreme Court investigation alleges he laundered over $1 billion through an online betting operation. Additionally, he is under separate scrutiny regarding millions of dollars received from Daniel Vorcaro, a banker implicated in major financial scandals, which were allegedly used to fund a biopic about his father. While Bolsonaro vows to return to address the Brazilian people and outline a strategy to oppose Lula’s government, his current location in Florida, home to the largest Brazilian diaspora in the United States, complicates his political standing. The Brazilian government has not yet responded to requests for comment regarding potential diplomatic repercussions stemming from the senator’s unauthorized exit and the involvement of foreign powers in his transit.