Steinar Wangen, 55-letni Norvežanec, je bil obsojen na 15 let zapora za napad na Malin, 47-letno žensko iz Švedske, ki je umrla v Trollhättanu septembra 2024.
Wangen je obtožil sodnika in njegov zagovornik, Gaute Nilsen, je izjavil, da bo sodnik obtožen. Zagovornik Tor Magnus Fagermo, ki je tudi zastopal Wangen, je dejal, da je 55-letnik obtožen.
Rettens dom je tudi poudaril, da ima Wangen pomanjkanje spoštovanja do človeškega življenja. Dokumentirano je, da je komuniciral z Malinom in drugimi prek klepetanja, kjer opisuje, kako ljudje umirajo in kakšna čustva doživljajo v zvezi z ravnanjem z njimi.
Malinovi potomci, vključno z njeno mamo, očetom in sinom, so izjavili, da se jim je zelo težko prepričati, da je Wangen zdaj odgovoren za umor Malin. Vedno so menili, da je on odgovoren za njeno smrt in da bi lahko bil še danes živ, če ne bi bilo njegovih dejanj. Bistandsadvokatene Heidi Reisvang og Ida Andenæs Mehren so tudi komentirali, da so na sodišču ugotovili, da zadeva ni imela značaja usmiljenja, temveč je Wangen doživel osebno zadovoljstvo pri obravnavi.
Sodišče je prav tako ugotovilo, da je treba znesek nadomestila za škodo, ki jo je utrpel Malin, nekoliko zmanjšati, ker je Malin želel umreti.
Odločba prav tako poudarja, da je Wangen resna nevarnost za družbo in da bo v prihodnje izpostavljen visokemu tveganju za nasilje. Strokovnjaki so pri Wangenu diagnosticirali disocialno osebnostno motnjo in narcisoidno osebnostno motnjo. Prav tako so navedli, da ni imel občutka krivde, sramu, občutka krivde ali dvomov o svojih dejanjih, tako leta 1987, kot leta 2023 in še danes.
2 poročil
NRK NyheterDržavni / javniSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 65pred 17 uramiSteinar Wangen, a 55-year-old Norwegian man, has been convicted of murdering Malin (47) in Trollhättan, Sweden, during the autumn of 2024. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison with a minimum term of 10 years. The conviction was based largely on Wangen’s communications with Malin and others, despite a lack of technical evidence. Wangen’s defense attorney, Tor Magnus Fagermo, stated that his client was deeply affected by the verdict and plans to appeal it. The court noted that Wangen showed a lack of respect for human life and expressed personal interest in the process of death in his messages. Wangen was also ordered to pay 930,000 kroner in compensation to Malin’s family. The prosecution welcomed the verdict, calling it thorough and aligned with their arguments.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents the legal proceedings and quotes both the defendant's lawyer and the prosecution, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring one side. It focuses on the judicial outcome and does not take a clear ideological stance.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 65): The article accurately reports the conviction and sentence of Steinar Wangen, aligning with the cross-source consensus. It includes details from the verdict and mentions the appeal. However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'fortvilet' and presents the defendant’s reaction through his lawye
DagbladetNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 60pred 17 uramiA 55-year-old man named Steinar Wangen has been sentenced to 15 years in prison for the death of Malin, a 47-year-old woman in Sweden. Wangen admitted to traveling to Trollhättan to assist Malin with suicide but denied killing her. Prosecutors claim he suffocated her after she became unconscious from medication and alcohol, while Wangen claims he only provided support. The court ruled against his defense, citing inconsistencies in his testimony and concerns about his credibility. Wangen’s legal team plans to appeal the decision. The victims’ families expressed relief at the conviction, emphasizing that Wangen exploited Malin’s vulnerability and that the case does not qualify as a mercy killing. They noted that the court emphasized Wangen’s personal satisfaction with his actions.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings, including both the prosecution's claims and the defendant's defense. While the crime involves a serious moral and legal issue, the reporting focuses on the judicial process rather than taking a clear ideological stance. The framing is
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 80 · Objektivnost 60): This article provides factual information about the conviction and appeal, matching the cross-source consensus. However, it includes a misleading image related to a different case and uses emotive language such as 'grovt utnyttet hennes sårbarhet,' which introduces subjective interpretation.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
NO
