Sodišče je odredilo FIR proti dvema profesorjema Univerze v Delhiju in še enemu zaradi goljufije o lažnih učiteljskih službah.

A Delhi court has directed the police to file a formal complaint (FIR) against two Delhi University (DU) assistant professors, along with a third individual, accused of orchestrating a fraudulent scheme involving fake academic credentials and financial exploitation. The incident, which unfolded over several months, has raised serious concerns about academic integrity and the misuse of institutional authority within higher education institutions.

According to the FIR filed by a 28-year-old woman who previously served as an assistant professor at DU's Bharti College, she was approached by two DU faculty members who promised her a teaching position in exchange for a payment of ₹1 lakh. These individuals allegedly assured her that publishing research articles would be a mandatory requirement for securing the job. She reportedly accepted their offer and transferred the money, believing they were legitimate academics offering genuine career opportunities. However, her tenure at the institution was abruptly ended when the college principal informed her that an RTI inquiry had uncovered discrepancies in her published works, labeling them as fabricated. This revelation led to her termination from the post.

The legal proceedings began when the woman submitted a complaint to the court, detailing the circumstances surrounding her involvement with the two professors. The judicial magistrate, Gaurav Katariya, issued an order on July 1, directing the police to initiate an investigation into the matter. The court emphasized the need to determine whether other individuals might have been similarly affected by this alleged misconduct. The judge also noted the importance of examining whether such practices could be widespread within the university system.

The individuals implicated in the case include the two assistant professors from DU and a third person whose role remains under scrutiny. While the identities of these individuals have not been disclosed publicly, the allegations suggest that they may have colluded to exploit the complainant's trust and financial vulnerability. The nature of their alleged actions—forging documents and deceiving a prospective employee—raises broader questions about the ethical standards upheld by academic professionals and the mechanisms in place to safeguard against such deceptions.

This case comes amid growing public concern over the prevalence of academic fraud and unethical practices in educational institutions. Reports of fabricated research papers, ghostwriting, and the sale of academic credentials have become increasingly common, often facilitated by unscrupulous individuals posing as credible scholars. In this instance, the alleged perpetrators exploited the complainant's professional aspirations and financial situation, highlighting the potential for abuse within academic circles.

As the investigation unfolds, authorities will likely scrutinize the extent of the fraud and its implications for the credibility of DU's academic programs. The outcome of this case could set important precedents regarding accountability and transparency in academic hiring processes. Meanwhile, the victim continues to seek justice, hoping that the legal process will uncover the full scope of the deception and ensure that those responsible face appropriate consequences.