Mukesh Khanna pravi, da CJP ne predstavlja študentov ali generacije Z.

A war of words has escalated between Bollywood actress-turned-BJP MP Kangana Ranaut and the self-proclaimed Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), with both sides exchanging sharp criticisms over the conduct of Gen Z protesters and the role of politicians in shaping national discourse. The conflict intensified after Ranaut referred to the younger generation as "Generation Gutter," prompting the CJP’s spokesperson, Saurav Das, to accuse her of lacking credibility and failing to take her responsibilities as a parliamentarian seriously. The dispute began when Ranaut criticized the CJP-led protests at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, where demonstrators allegedly used abusive language toward Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his family. She called the language used in protest videos "puke-inducing" and "crass," questioning whether the parents of such students could afford legal representation in the future. She also accused the protesters of behaving in ways that undermined the dignity of Indian society, stating that they did not reflect the values of true students or citizens. In response, Saurav Das of the CJP dismissed Ranaut’s remarks, arguing that even her own party, the BJP, does not take her seriously. He pointed to videos of Ranaut visiting her Lok Sabha constituency in Himachal Pradesh, where she had previously expressed surprise at the workload of being an MP. Das suggested that her own behavior demonstrated a lack of seriousness, noting that she had initially thought the role required minimal effort before realizing its demands. Das further contended that Gen Z had made greater contributions to the nation than Ranaut, emphasizing their role in restoring faith in India’s democratic institutions. He challenged her to consider whether she had achieved similar feats, suggesting that her criticisms lacked substance. The exchange took place against the backdrop of widespread protests related to the alleged leakage of the NEET-UG 2026 exam paper. These demonstrations, which saw large numbers of students gathering in Delhi, became a focal point for political and social commentary. While many viewed the protests as legitimate expressions of concern over educational issues, others, including Ranaut, condemned the language and behavior observed among some participants. Veteran actor Mukesh Khanna, who has been vocal about the situation, criticized the CJP and its supporters, claiming they did not represent genuine students. In a video posted on Instagram, he stated that the protesters were not authentic representatives of the student community and instead had political agendas. He compared them to "cockroaches," suggesting that they needed to be removed from public spaces due to their inappropriate conduct. Khanna also alleged that the protests were "sponsored" and not driven by genuine student concerns. He warned young people against participating in such movements, cautioning that their actions on camera could negatively impact their future careers and employment prospects. His comments added another layer to the debate, highlighting the broader societal anxieties around youth activism and its perceived legitimacy. As the controversy continues, the lines between political rhetoric and personal attacks blur. Both Ranaut and the CJP have used the incident to highlight deeper ideological divides, with each side accusing the other of undermining the values of the nation. Meanwhile, figures like Mukesh Khanna attempt to mediate the discussion, offering perspectives that challenge the narratives put forward by both camps. The situation reflects a growing tension between different segments of Indian society, particularly regarding the role of youth in politics and the expectations placed upon them. With no immediate resolution in sight, the debate is likely to continue, influencing public perception and political strategies in the coming weeks.