Čadska vlada se bo umaknila iz ICC-ja.

Chad’s government announced on Monday that it is withdrawing from the International Criminal Court (ICC), citing dissatisfaction with the court’s perceived bias toward African nations. The decision came through a formal notice sent to the United Nations Secretary-General, marking Chad as the latest country to challenge the ICC’s authority. This move aligns with broader regional tensions over the court’s jurisdiction and its perceived focus on African states. The announcement was made by Chad’s Foreign Ministry, which stated that its decision followed an extensive evaluation of the ICC’s operations since its establishment in 2002. According to the ministry, the court’s record shows “selectivity” in prosecuting cases, with a disproportionate number involving African countries. Of 13 investigations initiated since the ICC’s inception, nine have centered on African states, while only four concern other global regions. Furthermore, among seven individuals detained under ICC warrants, only one was from outside Africa. The ministry argued that these figures demonstrate a systemic imbalance in how the court addresses justice globally. Chad’s withdrawal comes amid growing criticism of the ICC, particularly from African governments and leaders who accuse the court of targeting their region. The country’s Foreign Ministry claimed that the ICC’s actions reflect a “lasting concentration” of cases on the Global South, especially Africa. In response, the ministry called on other African Union members to consider similar steps, emphasizing that national and continental judicial systems can fulfill the mission of delivering justice without external oversight. The timing of Chad’s decision coincided with a controversial vote to remove the ICC’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, due to allegations of sexual misconduct. This development further strained relations between the ICC and some member states, including the U.S. and Russia, which have long questioned the court’s impartiality. The U.S., though never a signatory to the Rome Statute, has historically supported the ICC’s work, until recently. Since the issuance of arrest warrants against Israeli officials shortly after Donald Trump’s re-election in November 2024, the U.S. has become increasingly critical of the court’s independence and its alignment with the United Nations. Chad’s government also noted that during recent diplomatic discussions with U.S. officials, including Assistant Secretary of State Frank Garcia Jr., the U.S. expressed concerns about the ICC’s functionality and encouraged Chad to reassess its membership. While Chad did not immediately confirm whether it would reverse course, it indicated that the request would be reviewed by relevant authorities. This suggests that the U.S. may continue to exert influence on the political stance of African nations regarding the ICC. President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno, who led Chad into this decision, has faced scrutiny over his leadership style. Although he assumed power in May 2024 following delayed elections, critics allege that the transition was marred by irregularities. Despite claims of a shift toward civilian governance, the Deby family maintains deep ties to the military, a pattern common among many African leaders. This historical context underscores the complex interplay between domestic politics and foreign policy decisions, particularly concerning institutions like the ICC. As the fallout from Chad’s withdrawal unfolds, the implications for the ICC and its legitimacy will likely intensify. With more African nations potentially considering similar moves, the court faces mounting pressure to address accusations of bias and improve transparency. Meanwhile, the geopolitical landscape continues to evolve, shaped by shifting alliances and diverging views on international justice. The coming months will reveal how these developments reshape the future of the ICC and its role in global affairs.