The International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) has abandoned a controversial plan to sell a minority stake in the commercial rights to the World Cup following intense opposition from regional football confederations. The governing body confirmed on Friday that it would not proceed with the proposal after just four days of mounting resistance from football authorities around the world, marking one of the most significant policy reversals of FIFA president Gianni Infantino’s tenure. The initial plan, announced earlier in the week, aimed to raise up to $4.2 billion by selling approximately a 20% stake in a newly created commercial entity that would oversee FIFA’s major tournaments, including the World Cup. FIFA stated that the investment would generate billions of dollars for football development programs globally. However, the proposal quickly sparked widespread backlash, with critics arguing that FIFA was placing one of the sport’s most valuable assets into private hands. Regional confederations accused FIFA of failing to adequately consult its members before unveiling the proposal, which many believed could fundamentally alter the commercial landscape of world football. Critics warned that the governing body was treating the World Cup as a financial asset rather than a cherished sporting tradition. After several days of escalating criticism, Infantino acknowledged that the proposal had become too divisive. "In having listened carefully to all the views, it has become clear that the project has created divisions of a nature that, regardless of the level of support, are no longer in the interest of the objective set out in the first place," Infantino said in a statement. "Our purpose has always been, and will always be, to unite and improve. As a result, this proposal will not proceed." Infantino added that FIFA would focus on rebuilding consensus with its stakeholders. "My intent is to bring all interested parties back together in the coming days and weeks in the spirit of shared interest in our game, and with the objective to continue growing football everywhere, particularly in those countries that mostly need our support." Opposition to the proposal gained momentum rapidly. UEFA, Europe’s governing football body, led the resistance, accusing FIFA of attempting to put the “soul” of football up for sale. On Thursday, all 55 UEFA member associations unanimously voted to boycott FIFA competitions unless the proposal was withdrawn, stating that the World Cup “cannot be treated as an investment product.” The Confederation of North, Central America and Caribbean Association Football (CONCACAF), representing 41 national associations, also rejected the proposal during meetings on Thursday. By Friday, the Asian Football Confederation (AFC), which includes 47 member associations, publicly aligned itself with UEFA and CONCACAF. Collectively, these three confederations represent 143 of FIFA’s 211 member associations, comfortably exceeding the majority required to block the proposal. The backlash highlighted growing frustration over FIFA’s decision-making processes. On Saturday, AFC President Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim Al Khalifa welcomed FIFA’s decision to abandon the plan but emphasized that any proposal capable of reshaping world football must involve broader consultation. He stated that initiatives with significant consequences should be presented to confederations, the FIFA Council, member associations, and other stakeholders in a “timely, transparent, and meaningful manner.” "The future of global football must always be shaped through proper consultation, collective dialogue, and respect for the established governance structures of our game," Sheikh Salman said. Football Australia chairman Anter Isaac echoed these concerns, noting that innovation should never come at the expense of football’s governing principles. "Football has never stood still, nor should it," Isaac said. "Some principles, however, should never change. Integrity. Independence. Good governance." The controversy surrounding the proposed deal underscored deep divisions within the global football community. While FIFA aimed to secure additional funding for the development of football in underrepresented regions, the method of achieving this goal, through the sale of commercial rights, was met with strong resistance from key stakeholders. The decision to scrap the plan reflects the influence of regional confederations and highlights the challenges faced by FIFA in maintaining unity among its diverse membership base.
5 poročil
Der StandardNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 94Objektivnost 88pred 4 dneviMednarodna nogometna zveza (FIFA) je napovedala, da namerava prodati komercialne pravice do svojih turnirjev vlagateljem, s ciljem zbiranja več kot štiri milijarde dolarjev. To vključuje prihodnje tekme svetovnega pokala, ki bodo nato organizirane pod novim subjektom, imenovanim FFE, kjer bo FIFA ohranila večinsko lastništvo. Evropska nogometna zveza UEFA je odločno kritizirala ta korak, ki navaja, da prečka mejo, ko obravnava nogomet kot blago. Po mnenju FIFA bi lahko zasebni vlagatelji kupili do 20% delnic v novem podjetju, medtem ko bi vsi 211 člani združenj prejeli manjše deleže. FIFA trdi, da je ta pobuda namenjena demokratizaciji nogometa po vsem svetu in vlaganju desetih milijard dolarjev v razvoj športa po vsem svetu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljena tako FIFA kot tudi kritika UEFA, ne da bi očitno naklonjena katerikoli strani.
Zakaj dejstva (94): The article accurately reports the FIFA plan to sell partial commercial rights to investors for over four billion dollars, mentions the creation of a new entity called FFE valued at 20 billion dollars, and includes direct quotes from the UEFA criticizing the move. The details align closely with the
Zakaj objektivnost (88): The article presents the information neutrally, quoting both FIFA and the UEFA. It avoids overtly biased language but does frame the FIFA initiative as controversial, which may slightly influence perception.
Deutsche Welle (Deutsch)Državni / javniSredinaDejstva 93Objektivnost 87pred 3 dneviNogometna zveza (FIFA) pod vodstvom predsednika Giannija Infantina je napovedala, da namerava prodati komercialne pravice do svojih nogometnih turnirjev prek nove organizacije, imenovane FFE, s ciljem zbiranja več kot štiri milijarde dolarjev. Ta ukrep vključuje ustvarjanje nove družbe, v kateri bi FIFA obdržala večinsko lastništvo, vendar bi zasebnim vlagateljem omogočila nakup do 20 odstotkov delnic. Evropska nogometna zveza (UEFA) je kritizirala načrt, ki trdi, da prekoračuje mejo s komodifikacijo nogometa in pomanjkanjem preglednosti glede finančnih koristi. Bivši predsednik FIFA Sepp Blatter je izrazil tudi močno nesoglasje, pri čemer je opozoril na tesen odnos med Infantinom in ameriškim predsednikom Donaldom Trumpom, ki bi lahko finančno škodoval nogometu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene tako predlog FIFA kot tudi kritike UEFA in nekdanjih voditeljev, kot je Sepp Blatter, ne da bi očitno naklonjeni eni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (93): The article accurately describes the FIFA proposal to sell part of the commercial rights to investors, mentions the value of the deal, and includes statements from the UEFA and former FIFA president Sepp Blatter. It aligns with the other articles and provides additional context about the relationshi
Zakaj objektivnost (87): The article remains largely objective but includes a quote from Sepp Blatter that may introduce a subtle bias. The overall tone is neutral, though it emphasizes the controversy surrounding the deal.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Neodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 92Objektivnost 85pred 4 dneviFIFA je napovedala načrte za prodajo delnih komercialnih pravic do svojih nogometnih turnirjev zasebnim vlagateljem, s ciljem ustvariti več kot štiri milijarde ameriških dolarjev. To bi vključevalo organizacijo prihodnjih dogodkov, kot so svetovni pokali pod novo podružnico, FFE, kjer bi FIFA ohranila večinsko lastništvo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni tako predlog FIFA kot kritika UEFA, ne da bi se očitno naklonjena eni strani. V članku so navedeni neposredni navedbi obeh organizacij in ne uporablja se pristranski jezik ali selektivno izpustijo perspektive.
Zakaj dejstva (92): The article provides accurate details about the proposed sale of commercial rights by FIFA, including the target amount of over four billion dollars and the formation of the FFE. It also references external sources like the 'Times' and 'Financial Times', though some details are speculative.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but shows a slight bias toward the UEFA’s criticism. It uses phrases like 'Infantino überschreite eine Grenze,' which implies judgment rather than presenting facts objectively.
Siol.netDržavni / javniSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 70pred 3 dneviMednarodna nogometna zveza (FIFA) je predlagala prodajo 20% deleža komercialnih pravic za svetovno prvenstvo zasebnim vlagateljem, kar je sprožilo močno kritiko različnih nogometnih zvez, vključno z UEFA, evropskim nogometnim upravnim organom pod vodstvom slovenskega predsednika Aleksandra Čeferina. Predlog zahteva odobritev izvršnega odbora FIFA, ki ga sestavlja 38 članov, in večine njegovih 211 članov. UEFA in druge nogometne organizacije so izrazile zaskrbljenost zaradi pomanjkanja preglednosti in pravilnih postopkov, ki obkrožajo odločitev, nekateri pa so predlagali drastične ukrepe, kot je bojkot svetovnega prvenstva, če FIFA ne premisli. Nekdanji predsednik FIFA Sepp Blatter je kritiziral tesen odnos med trenutnim predsednikom FIFA Giannijem Infantinom in ameriškim predsednikom Donaldom Trumpom, ki je dejal, da finančno škoduje nogometu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni različni pogledi različnih nogometnih zvez, uradnikov in kritikov, ki uravnoteženo pokrivajo polemiko o predlogu FIFA.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article provides accurate information about Fifa's plan to sell 20 percent of commercial rights to private investors and mentions Uefa's potential response, including the possibility of a boycott. It references Sky News regarding Uefa considering a boycott of the World Cup. However, it lacks spe
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article uses strong language such as 'war' and 'sell-off' and suggests Uefa might consider a boycott, which may reflect a biased perspective. The mention of 'virtual meeting' and 'skrajnem ukrepu' implies a clear stance against Fifa's proposal, potentially influencing the reader's perception.
Daily SabahStrankarsko povezanSredinapred 13 uramiFIFA je zavrnila svoj načrt za prodajo 20% deleža v komercialnih pravicah do svetovnega prvenstva za do 4,2 milijarde dolarjev, potem ko se je soočila z močnim nasprotovanjem regionalnih nogometnih konfederacij. Predlog, ki je bil napovedan le štiri dni prej, je bil namenjen financiranju svetovnega nogometnega razvoja, vendar je sprožil široko kritiko zaradi pomanjkanja posvetovanj in zaskrbljenosti zaradi privatizacije enega od najdragocenejših športnih sredstev. Po intenzivnem nasprotovanju je predsednik FIFA Gianni Infantino priznal, da je pobuda povzročila nepotrebno razdelitev in jo odločil opustiti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja situacijo, citira stališče Fife in kritike regionalnih konfederacij, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani, izogiba se obremenjenemu jeziku in zagotavlja uravnoteženo predstavitev konflikta.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
