A senior official from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) has voiced frustration over the limitations imposed by the country’s long-standing bank secrecy laws, particularly in relation to the ongoing impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte. During a ceremony marking the signing of an information-sharing agreement between the BSP and the Department of Justice, Deputy Governor Elmore Capule highlighted how these laws hinder investigations into potential financial misconduct. The issue came to light after the Senate, acting as an impeachment court, attempted to subpoena bank and anti-money laundering council (AMLC) records related to Duterte, her husband Manases Carpio, and their associated businesses. However, the court found itself unable to access foreign currency deposits due to stricter protections under the Foreign Currency Deposit Act. Capule emphasized the disparity between the Bank Secrecy Law, which permits bank inquiries in impeachment cases, and the Foreign Currency Deposit Act, which mandates written consent from the account holder before any examination. This distinction left prosecutors with incomplete data, despite having obtained the court’s approval. The exclusion of foreign currency deposits from the subpoenas raised concerns among investigators who were seeking to establish a comprehensive financial profile of the individuals involved in the case. During the event, Capule recounted his early experiences with the challenges posed by bank secrecy laws. One of his initial encounters with potential government corruption involved a state-owned corporation transferring funds to a private account during the EDSA revolution. At the time, Capule advocated for the right to examine such accounts, arguing that the deposited money was already under litigation. After a lengthy process, the court eventually ruled in favor of the investigation, but by then, the funds had been moved, rendering them effectively inaccessible. This experience underscored the difficulties faced by investigators trying to trace illicit financial activities through existing legal frameworks. Capule further criticized the evolution of bank secrecy policies, noting how they have become intertwined with the Anti-Money Laundering Act. He expressed concern that other countries view the combination of bank secrecy and money laundering provisions as contradictory, questioning the logic behind such a legislative approach. Despite his criticisms, Capule clarified that he did not assert that Duterte possessed undisclosed foreign currency deposits or that any account contained illegal proceeds. His primary concern lay in the continued existence of bank secrecy laws that could potentially shield criminal activity from scrutiny. The Senate’s decision to subpoena records involving Duterte marks a significant step in the impeachment process, aiming to uncover any discrepancies in her financial disclosures. The prosecution seeks to compare the couple’s declared income, assets, liabilities, and business interests with the financial records obtained through the subpoenas. This move comes amid broader discussions about the need for reform in financial regulations to ensure transparency and accountability in high-profile cases. As the impeachment trial progresses, the limitations imposed by current bank secrecy laws will likely continue to pose challenges for investigators. The situation highlights the urgent need for legislative review and potential amendments to address gaps in the existing framework. With the Senate poised to play a crucial role in determining the outcome of the proceedings, the implications of these legal constraints on the effectiveness of the impeachment process remain to be fully realized.
6 poročil
RapplerNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 85pred 10 dneviVisoki uradnik Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), namestnik guvernerja Elmore Capule, je kritiziral zastarele zakone o bančni tajnosti na Filipinih, potem ko je bil poskus tožilstva, da bi preučilo finančne zapise podpredsednice Sare Duterte, blokiran zaradi zaščite depozita v tuji valuti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se to vprašanje obravnava kot sistemski neuspeh sedanjih finančnih predpisov pri preprečevanju zlorabe, zlasti v pomembnih političnih primerih, kot je obtožba proti podpredsednici Sari Duterte.
Zakaj dejstva (95): This article provides detailed reporting on a BSP official criticizing outdated bank secrecy laws related to the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte. It includes direct quotes, specific dates, and references to legal procedures, showing strong adherence to factual reporting and alignment with
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the facts and legal proceedings without apparent bias. It presents both sides of the issue (the prosecution's request and the court's response) fairly, contributing to its high objectivity score.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 15 dneviPodpredsednica Saro Duterte je zaradi izboljšanja ocene zadovoljstva ni zaščitena pred postopkom obtožbe, je dejal Benjamin 'Jay' Tolosa Jr., pravni predstavnik zastupniške ekipe. Tolosa je poudaril, da je ustavna odgovornost temeljila na dokazih, ne na odobritvi javnosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni argumenti obeh strani postopka opozarjanja, ne da bi očitno zagovarjali eno perspektivo. Vključuje citate iz ekipe tožilcev, ki poudarjajo ustavno odgovornost nad priljubljenostjo, pa tudi sklicevanja na pretekle primere, kot je ta nekdanjega vrhovnega sodnika Reno
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports on Rep. Terry Ridon’s concerns about the authenticity of the recipients of confidential funds. It details the potential implications of fictitious names and the need for verification, which aligns with the legal and investigative processes described in the primary sour
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents the concerns of the prosecution objectively, without introducing personal opinions or emotional language. It focuses on the legal and evidentiary challenges facing the defense.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 80pred 18 dnevi Obtožnica ne bo več predstavila Lopeza.Odvetnica Lorna Kapunan, ki zastopa tožbeno ekipo Predstavniškega doma, je izjavila, da ekipa ne bo več klicala Zuleike Lopez, vodje osebja pisarne podpredsednika, kot priče pri procesu za impeachment podpredsednice Sare Duterte. Kapunan je trdil, da bi bilo Lopezovo pričevanje odvečno, saj so podobne informacije že zagotovile druge priče, vključno s kapetanom Belindo Bello, ki je bila vključena v varnostne zadeve med Duterteovim časom v Domu. Tožilstvo je sprva načrtovalo, da predstavi Lopez kot sovražno pričo zaradi njene vloge v razpravah okoli IV. člena obtožb za impeachment, ki trdijo, da je izdala javno zaupanje na podlagi Duterteovih domnevnih groženj proti predsedniku Ferdinandu Marcosu Jr. in drugim. Lopez je bila aretirana novembra 2024 zaradi domnevnega vmešavanja v domnevno finančno kršitev v pisarni Duterteja, kar je domnevno privedlo do ustnih napadov Duterteja in Marcos Romualdeza.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljena odločitev tožilske ekipe, da Zuleiko Lopez opusti kot pričo, in sicer zaradi presežka, ne pa zaradi kakršne koli ideološke naklonjenosti.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports that Terry Ridon challenged the lawyers of Vice President Sara Duterte, urging them to improve their cross-examination. This is consistent with the primary source document detailing the trial's progression and legal arguments. The information is presented factually wit
Zakaj objektivnost (80): While the article is factual, it carries a slightly confrontational tone, implying that the lawyers are not performing adequately. This introduces a subtle element of judgment rather than pure neutrality.
GMA News OnlineNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 90pred 12 dneviSodišče za opozarjanje senata je izdalo sodne pozive za bančne zapise Sare Duterte, vložke Sveta za boj proti pranju denarja (AMLC) in davčne dokumente. To sledi tekočim preiskavam morebitnih kršitev med njenim mandatom kot podpredsednica.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni postopkovni ukrepi, ki jih je sprejelo senatsko sodišče za impeachment, ne da bi javno podprlo ali kritiziralo dejanja, ki se preiskujejo.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article confirms the PNP's deployment of over 20,000 personnel for the Sona, aligning with the previous report. It includes specifics about the number of officers and their roles, consistent with the general context.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article is presented objectively, detailing the PNP's actions without introducing subjective commentary or bias.
RapplerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 60pred 9 dnevi Kitajska obalna straža uporablja vodne topove na filipinskih ladjah.Članek poroča, da so kitajske obalne straže uporabile vodne topove in nevarne manevre proti filipinskim obalnim stražam na območju Bajo de Masinloc. filipinska obalna straža trdi, da so bila ta dejanja sovražna in motnja. Drugi naslovi vključujejo razprave o sodnem postopku za impeachment podpredsednice Sare Duterte, vključno z pozivi k nepristranskosti senatorja Robina Padille, Dutertejevo prošnjo Senatu, da pokrije stroške obroka za njeno obrambo in kritiko zakonov o bančni tajnosti, povezanih z njenimi finančnimi razkritji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske poročanje o incidentu, ki vključuje kitajske in filipinske ladje, ne da bi očitno favoriziral katero koli stran.
Zakaj dejstva (70): This article serves more as a compilation of headlines and brief summaries rather than in-depth reporting. While some details are mentioned, such as the Chinese Coast Guard using water cannons, the lack of substantial content and depth reduces its factuality score. It also lacks primary sources or d
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone is more journalistic in format, listing various news items without deep exploration. However, the inclusion of emotionally charged headlines like 'Sara Duterte wants the Senate to pay for her defense team’s meals?' introduces a subjective framing, lowering its objectivity.
RapplerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 60Objektivnost 70pred 17 dnevi Na javnem trgu: Kdo gleda sodbo za opozarjanje Sare Duterte?V članku se razpravlja o sojenju za impeachment podpredsednice Sare Duterte in se sprašuje, ali bo postalo pomembna državljanska lekcija, kot so bile prejšnje impeachmente.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek postavlja vprašanje o javnem interesu v procesu obtožnice, ne da bi sprejel jasno stališče o izidu ali posledicah.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article discusses media coverage and public interest in the trial but doesn't provide substantial factual details about the subpoena ruling or the legal arguments presented in the primary source. It focuses more on commentary than reporting.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article is neutral in tone but focuses on analysis rather than factual reporting. It invites reader engagement without taking a clear stance on the issue.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
PH
