United States🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnoSpregledano pri konservativnihpred 10 urami
Bojkot grozi, da bo uničil svetovno premiero Odiseje zaradi snemanja v zahodni Sahari, ki jo nadzoruje Maroko
Aktivisti, ki zastopajo avtohtone Saharce, pozivajo k bojkotu filma Christopherja Nolana "Odiseja" zaradi snemanja v zahodni Sahari, ki jo nadzoruje Maroko, ki jo štejejo za okupirano ozemlje. Film je bil posnet v Dakhli, regiji, ki jo zahtevajo Saharci, vendar je pod marokansko vojaško okupacijo od sedemdesetih let prejšnjega stoletja. Saharski novinar Mamine Hachimi trdi, da snemanje tam legitimizira maroški nadzor in ne obravnava tekoče okupacije. Opozarja, da se Saharski novinarji soočajo z zaporom zaradi dokumentiranja kršitev človekovih pravic. Drugi Saharski umetniki in filmski ustvarjalci so kritizirali izbiro lokacije filma, ki jo povezujejo s širšimi vprašanji kulturnega izkoriščanja in kolonialnih pripovedi.
Christopher Nolan's upcoming film The Odyssey, a high-profile adaptation of Homer's classic epic, has sparked widespread controversy and calls for a boycott due to its filming in Moroccan-controlled Western Sahara. The film, set to debut globally, includes scenes shot in Dakhla, a town located in the disputed territory. Activists argue that the location is under Moroccan military occupation, and that the use of the area for filming legitimizes Morocco's control over the region, which the indigenous Sahrawi people claim as their homeland. Protesters gathered outside the London premiere of The Odyssey last week, chanting slogans such as "Free Sahara!" and "Shame!" in solidarity with the Sahrawi cause. These demonstrations highlight the deepening tensions surrounding the film's production. According to reports, the filming took place in Dakhla, a strategic location on the Atlantic coast, approximately 340 miles south of Laayoune, the largest city in Western Sahara. The region has been under Moroccan military rule since the 1970s, though the Sahrawi people continue to assert their sovereignty over the entire territory. Human rights organizations and Sahrawi activists accuse Morocco of engaging in cultural genocide and ethnic cleansing in the area. They point to ongoing displacement of local communities, the construction of large-scale infrastructure projects such as ports, resorts, and wind farms, and the systematic suppression of Sahrawi identity. In response, Sahrawi filmmaker and activist Abidin Mohamed Hamudi has condemned Nolan's decision, calling him "complicit" in the occupation. Similarly, filmmaker Mamine Hachimi has criticized the film for legitimizing Moroccan authority and failing to address the realities faced by the Sahrawi people. The controversy extends beyond the Sahrawi issue. Greek critics have also voiced concerns, arguing that the film excludes Greek actors despite its basis in Greek mythology. A Greek news outlet criticized the casting choices, noting that the story, originally written by Homer, should feature Greek performers. Such criticisms underscore broader debates about representation and authenticity in global cinema. The conflict in Western Sahara dates back to the 1970s, following Spain's withdrawal from the region. Morocco then assumed control, leading to a protracted struggle for independence. The Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) was established in 1976, asserting sovereignty over the territory. Despite international recognition of SADR by several countries, including the United Nations, Morocco continues to administer the area, maintaining a 2,700-kilometer-long barrier known as "The Berm," reinforced with landmines to prevent cross-border movement. Sahrawi activists emphasize that the film's use of the region for filming represents a tacit endorsement of Moroccan occupation. They argue that the decision to shoot there undermines the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination and perpetuates historical injustices. One Sahrawi political prisoner, Naâma Asfari, currently on hunger strike in Moroccan custody, has drawn attention for his advocacy for freedom and justice. His case, along with others, underscores the ongoing repression faced by Sahrawi activists and journalists. As the film prepares for wider release, the debate over its production choices continues to gain momentum. Supporters of the Sahrawi cause urge audiences to avoid watching The Odyssey and instead engage with films that accurately represent the region's complex history and struggles. Meanwhile, the film's creators remain silent on the matter, leaving the issue to unfold in public discourse.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Christopher Nolanova prihodnja film 'Odiseja', ki temelji na Homerjevem starodavnem epu, je sprožila mednarodno polemiko, potem ko so se pojavile poročila, da so bili deli filma posneti v Zahodni Sahari, regiji, ki jo je zahtevala Fronta Polisario in jo je okupiral Maroko od leta 1975. zagovorniki človekovih pravic in saharski aktivisti trdijo, da snemanje na območju, ki je pod marokanskim nadzorom, podpira kolonializem in krši pravice avtohtonega saharskega ljudstva.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se zadeva obravnava z vidika zagovarjanja človekovih pravic in protikolonialnega upora ter poudarjajo moralne posledice snemanja na okupiranih ozemljih.
Aktivisti, ki zastopajo avtohtone Saharce, pozivajo k bojkotu filma Christopherja Nolana "Odiseja" zaradi snemanja v zahodni Sahari, ki jo nadzoruje Maroko, ki jo štejejo za okupirano ozemlje. Film je bil posnet v Dakhli, regiji, ki jo zahtevajo Saharci, vendar je pod marokansko vojaško okupacijo od sedemdesetih let prejšnjega stoletja. Saharski novinar Mamine Hachimi trdi, da snemanje tam legitimizira maroški nadzor in ne obravnava tekoče okupacije. Opozarja, da se Saharski novinarji soočajo z zaporom zaradi dokumentiranja kršitev človekovih pravic. Drugi Saharski umetniki in filmski ustvarjalci so kritizirali izbiro lokacije filma, ki jo povezujejo s širšimi vprašanji kulturnega izkoriščanja in kolonialnih pripovedi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se zadeva obravnava skozi lečo saharskega upora in kritike marokanske okupacije, poudarjajo pa se etične posledice snemanja na spornih ozemljih, poudarjajo pa stališča saharskih aktivistov in novinarjev, ki prikazujejo njihove skrbi kot legitimne in nujne.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.