Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces mounting pressure from within his Likud Party as a new poll reveals that former IDF chief Gadi Eisenkot has surged ahead of him in popularity, leading by 10 percentage points. The poll, conducted by the Lazar Research firm in collaboration with Panel4All, indicates that Eisenkot, who heads the centrist Yashar party, enjoys 48% support compared to Netanyahu’s 38%. This marks the largest gap recorded since the poll began tracking the two leaders. Meanwhile, Likud has gained two seats, bringing its total to 22, though the broader coalition bloc remains at 49 seats, still short of the 61 needed for a parliamentary majority. The poll highlights shifting dynamics within Israel’s political landscape. While Netanyahu’s Likud continues to dominate the right, the rise of Eisenkot signals growing dissatisfaction with the current leadership. The survey also notes that a new center-right alliance formed by Benny Gantz, Ayelet Shaked, Yuli Edelstein, and Dedi Simchi could capture four seats, potentially altering the balance of power. However, this new party’s success might come at the expense of the Zionist Home party, led by Chili Tropper and Yoaz Hendel, which narrowly cleared the electoral threshold with four seats. If the new center-right alliance gains traction, it could reduce the Zionist Home party’s support to below the threshold, thereby shifting the political calculus. The poll further underscores the uncertainty surrounding the leadership of the center-left bloc. Among those planning to vote for opposition parties, 45% indicated a preference for Eisenkot to lead the center-left bloc, surpassing Naftali Bennett, who received 25%, and Avigdor Liberman, who garnered 11%. The results suggest that the center-left bloc is grappling with internal divisions over who should represent it in the next Knesset election. Netanyahu’s lead over Bennett has narrowed slightly, with the former prime minister now trailing by five percentage points in a hypothetical matchup. This follows a previous poll where Bennett had a larger lead. The poll also revealed that Netanyahu maintains a slight edge over Liberman, securing 43% support compared to Liberman’s 39%. The poll was conducted between July 29 and 30, surveying 501 adults across Israel, including both Jewish and Arab populations. The maximum sampling error was estimated at 4.4 percentage points, reflecting the margin of error inherent in such surveys. In another development, the Likud Central Committee approved a proposal to expand Netanyahu’s control over the party’s Knesset slate. Under the new arrangement, Netanyahu will have eight reserved slots within the top 29 places on the list, granting him unprecedented influence over the selection of candidates. This decision has sparked internal debate within the party, with some members opposing the move, arguing that it undermines the democratic process that Likud has traditionally upheld. The approval of the proposal comes after Netanyahu’s failed attempt to cancel the party’s August 17 primaries in the event of a “wartime situation.” The Likud internal court rejected this effort, emphasizing that the party must adhere to its constitutional obligations and maintain its democratic structure. Despite this setback, Netanyahu has secured support from key ministers and party members, including Defense Minister Israel Katz, Transportation Minister Miri Regev, and others, who have publicly endorsed the changes to the primary system. Meanwhile, Eisenkot has raised concerns about his personal safety, prompting him to hire private bodyguards due to the lack of a state-issued, armed security detail. Eisenkot’s campaign director reportedly informed Shin Bet and police authorities of the decision, citing recent incidents and troubling publications that have heightened fears of political violence. Although the Shin Bet has not yet responded to the letter, the issue remains under review. As the election approaches, the political landscape continues to evolve, with potential shifts in alliances and voter preferences shaping the outcome. The interplay between established parties and emerging coalitions will likely play a crucial role in determining the next government. With the current polls indicating a tight race, the final weeks of campaigning could prove pivotal in deciding the direction of Israeli politics.
11 poročil
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 90včerajNedavna anketa Maariv, ki jo je izvedla Lazar Research, kaže, da je stranka Likud pridobila dva sedeža, kar je skupno 22, medtem ko bi lahko potencialna nova srednjo desna stranka, ki jo vodijo Benny Gantz, Ayelet Shaked, Yuli Edelstein in Dedi Simchi, zagotovila štiri sedeže.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni rezultati ankete, ne da bi se očitno naklonjeni kateri koli določeni stranki ali vodji.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately describes the Likud court's ruling overturning Netanyahu's attempt to cancel the primary, citing the court's reasoning and legal basis. It provides clear, factual information without embellishment.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the court's decision and its implications without taking sides or using emotionally charged language.
HaaretzNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 90pred 6 dneviIzraelski časopis Haaretz poroča, da je stranka Likud zavrnila poskus premierja Benjamina Netanjahua, da bi ukinil notranje primarne volitve stranke.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je Netanyahujev predlog predstavljen kot poskus utrditve moči, kar nakazuje morebitne avtoritarne težnje.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article confirms the Likud court's decision to reject Netanyahu's bid to cancel primaries, aligning with other sources. It presents the facts clearly and concisely.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The tone is neutral, focusing on the legal decision without adding emotional weight or bias.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 90pred 9 dnevi Najnevarnejša volilna sezona v Izraelu se je začela s opozorili o integriteti, kaosom v koalicijiIzraelski volitvi bodo po pričakovanjih zelo sporni, zaznamovani z zaskrbljenostjo zaradi integritete volivcev, politične retorike in notranjih koalicijskih konfliktov. Predsednik Isaac Herzog je opozoril, da je Shin Bet ugotovil morebitne grožnje volilnemu procesu, medtem ko se je stranka Likud soočila s kritiko zaradi uporabe kampanjskih videoposnetkov, ki jih je ustvarila AI, ki so ciljali na opozicijskega vodjo Gadija Eisenkota.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je uravnotežen pregled različnih političnih dogajanj, brez očitne pristranskosti do katere koli posebne strani.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article reports on a Channel 12 poll showing Yashar! as the largest party with 24 seats and Eisenkot as the preferred PM. It cites the Midgam Institute and provides detailed results, matching other polls.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The tone is neutral, focusing on the poll results and analysis without introducing subjective commentary or emotional language.
i24NEWSNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 6 dneviIzraelsko sodišče je razveljavilo poskus predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahua, da prekliče primarne volitve v svoji stranki Likud, ki jih je želel nadomestiti z imenovanim odborom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o sodni odločitvi v zvezi z notranjo stranko, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani, in predstavlja sodno dejanje kot krepitev demokratičnih procesov znotraj stranke, ne da bi uporabljal pristranski jezik ali selektivno poudarjal eno perspektivo nad drugo.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports that the Likud court overturned Netanyahu's bid to cancel the primary in favor of an appointed committee. This aligns with the details presented in article 3 and 4. The article is brief but factually sound.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article is straightforward and factual, but its brevity limits the depth of analysis. The tone is neutral, though the lack of additional context or perspective may affect the perception of balance.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 85pred 5 dnevi Likud glasuje za razširitev Netanjahujevega nadzora nad seznamom strank, da bi zagotovil vrhunske položajeCentralni odbor Likuda je glasoval, da bi premieru Benjaminu Netanjahu dal večji nadzor nad stranko v Knesetu, tako da mu dovoli, da odloči o osmih prvih 30 mestih pred notranjimi primarnimi volitvami, predvidenimi za 17. avgust.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene obe strani razprave, vključno z nasprotovanjem poslanca Davida Bitana in podporo različnih ministrov in osebnosti stranke.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article summarizes the Likud's rejection of Netanyahu's attempt to scrap primaries, citing the court's ruling and the party's stance. It provides accurate information without contradiction.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The tone is neutral, reporting the outcome and context without leaning towards either political side.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80predvčerajšnjim Bennett izgublja kot Eisenkot, Netanjahu je v dvoboju za prihajajoče volitve - anketaNedavna anketa je pokazala, da sta Benjamin Netanjahu in Gadi Eisenkot v primerjavi s prejšnjo anketo povečana za dva mandata. Naftali Bennett, nekdanji premier in vodja stranke "Skupaj", še naprej izgublja podporo, saj je zagotovil samo 13 mandatov - najnižji v tej seriji anket.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pregled podatkov o volilnih anketah, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobenemu kandidatu ali stranki.Označuje numerične rezultate in izbire volivcev objektivno, pri čemer se izogiba obremenjenemu jeziku ali pristranski razlagi.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article presents a poll showing Netanyahu and Eisenkot tied with 23 seats each, based on a Channel 13 News poll. It provides detailed results and mentions other parties' seat counts. While it doesn't reference a primary source directly, it aligns with other articles about similar poll results, s
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone is neutral, presenting the poll results without overt bias. However, it emphasizes Bennett's declining support and mentions specific parties, which may slightly lean toward highlighting certain political dynamics.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 4 dneviNedavna anketa Kanal 12 kaže, da sta izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu in njegov glavni tekmec, nekdanji vodja IDF Gadi Eisenkot, med volivci za vlogo predsednika vlade izenačena na 38% vsak. To označuje premik od prejšnje ankete, kjer je Eisenkot vodil Netanjahu. Anketa kaže, da bi proti-Netanyahu blok, razen arabskih strank, zagotovil 60 sedežev v Knessetu, kar je malo manj od večine, medtem ko bi pro-Netanyahu blok pridobil 50 sedežev. Arabske stranke naj bi osvojile 10 sedežev. Po anketi bi bila Eisenkotova stranka Yashar največja posamezna stranka z 23 sedeži, sledila Netanyahujeva Likud z 22 sedeži.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni podatki o anketah, ne da bi očitno naklonjeni Netanjahuju ali Eisenkotu.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article states that Eisenkot leads Netanyahu by 10 points and Likud gains two seats, based on a Maariv poll. It matches other articles about similar poll outcomes and provides consistent data on seat distribution.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone is neutral, reporting the poll results without apparent bias. It focuses on the numbers and trends without injecting personal opinion.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 10 dnevi Yashar! je največja stranka, Eisenkot je za PM, če se bodo volitve odvijale danes - anketaAnketa, ki jo je izvedel inštitut Midgam, kaže, da bi bila stranka Gadija Eisenkota Yashar! največja v Knessetu z 24 sedeži, če bi se volitve odvijale danes.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so nevtralno predstavljeni rezultati anketiranja, ki prikazujejo tako Eisenkotovo vodstvo kot Netanjahujevo stališče, ne da bi očitno podpirali katero koli stran. Vključuje uravnoteženo poročanje o preferencah volivcev in koalicijski dinamiki brez pomembnega uredniškega ali obremenjenega jezika.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article discusses the Likud's internal vote to expand Netanyahu's control over the party list, referencing the Central Committee's decision and the number of voters. It aligns with other reports on Likud's internal politics.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone is neutral, presenting the decision and its implications without overt bias, though it highlights the significance of the change.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 5 dnevi Likud odobri Netanjahujev načrt za razširitev njegovega nadzora nad strankamiCentralni odbor stranke Likud je odobril predlog, ki znatno poveča nadzor premierja Benjamina Netanjahua nad seznamom kandidatov za Knesset. Po novih pravilih bo Netanjahu imel osem rezerviranih mest na prvih 29 položajih, kar mu bo omogočilo vplivati na več kot tretjino realnega seznama stranke.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je razširitev Netanjahujevega nadzora opredeljena kot strateški korak za zagotovitev volilnega uspeha, pri čemer je poudarjena zaskrbljenost zaradi možnih izzivov priljubljenih, vendar manj privlačnih kandidatov.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on the Likud Central Committee approving Netanyahu's plan to expand his control over the party slate, citing specific numbers and positions. It references the current polling data and explains the concept of 'realistic slate' and the implications of the change. While no primary s
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article presents the development neutrally, explaining both Netanyahu's rationale and the opposition from within Likud. However, it includes some subjective language such as 'unprecedented influence' and 'concerns,' which may lean slightly towards portraying Netanyahu's move as significant, thou
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 75predvčerajšnjim Eisenkotova ekipa je poslala Shin Bet, da ga opozorijo, da je ogrožen, nima oboroženih varnostnikov.Po poročanju izraelske televizije je nekdanji vodja IDF Gadi Eisenkot zaradi skrbi za svojo varnost pred prihajajočimi izraelskimi volitvami najel zasebne, neoborožene telesne stražarje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o Eisenkotovih varnostnih ureditvah in navedeni pomisleki glede morebitnih groženj iz Irana.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article reports that Eisenkot hired private bodyguards due to security concerns, citing a Channel 12 news report. It includes quotes from the letter sent to security officials, providing specific details. This aligns with the broader context of security issues around the election.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article has a somewhat alarmist tone, emphasizing the threat to Eisenkot and the need for private security, which could be seen as biased towards portraying the situation as highly dangerous.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 75pred 6 dnevi Sodišče Likuda zavrne Netanyahujevo ponudbo, da v primeru vojne prekliče primarne volitve stranke.Sodišče izraelske Likudske stranke je zavrnilo poskus predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahua, da prekliče prihajajoče primarne volitve, če jih ne bo mogoče organizirati zaradi možnega "vojnega stanja". Sodišče je poudarilo, da bi moral Likud ostati kolektivna entiteta, namesto da bi postal enosebna stranka, ki jo nadzira izključno Netanjahu. Nekateri člani so izrazili zaskrbljenost, da je Netanjahu poskušal obiti primarne volitve, da bi ohranil absolutni nadzor nad stranko v Knesetu, kar bi lahko marginaliziralo druge zakonodajalce. Sodišče je predlagalo alternative, kot je preloženje primarne volitve ali uporaba elektronskega glasovanja, ki oba trenutno nista dovoljena v skladu z ustavo stranke. Ta odločitev je preklicala predhodno odobritev Likudskega ustavnega odbora, ki bi Netanjahuju omogočila pomemben vpliv na izborni proces.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je sodna odločba proti Netanijahujevemu predlogu predstavljena nevtralno, s sklicevanjem na njegove argumente in argumente sodišča.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article discusses the start of the election season, mentioning integrity warnings and coalition tensions. It references specific events like AI-generated campaign videos and internal Likud disputes, aligning with other reports.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone leans towards highlighting the volatility and controversy of the election season, which could be seen as slightly biased towards emphasizing conflict and tension.
IL
