PHOdvetnik Levito Baligod, ki zastopa 18 posameznikov, znanih kot "maleta boys", ki so predhodno trdili, da so bili bivši telesni stražarji bivšega predstavnika Ako Bicol Zaldy Co, je pojasnil, da ni izkoristil svojih strank, da bi ustvarili skupno prisego, ki obtožuje več vladnih uradnikov vpletenosti v vprašanja nadzora poplav.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske razjasnitve odvetnika Levita Baligoda glede morebitnih navzkrižjih interesov v pravni zadevi, ki vključuje politične osebnosti.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article reports on lawyer Levito Baligod’s statement regarding his clients' recanting and denies profiting from them. It references the 'maleta boys' and their involvement with ex-Ako Bicol Rep. Zaldy Co, but lacks specific details or citations to support these claims. Since no primary source is
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone suggests a narrative around legal proceedings and potential corruption, implying a certain stance on the matter. While not overtly biased, the focus on Baligod’s denial and the mention of 'flood control anomalies' may subtly frame the story in a way that aligns with broader political narrat
