Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on the Upper West Side of New York City on Sunday to condemn Mayor Zohran Mamdani following two violent stabbing attacks that occurred earlier in the week. The protest, organized by the #EndJewHatred movement, aimed to hold city leadership accountable for rising crime and accuse the administration of fostering a dangerous environment for minority communities. Demonstrators marched through the streets carrying signs and chanting slogans, demanding accountability and structural changes. Among the most common chants were “Remove Mamdani,” “Arrest Mamdani,” and “Zohran, Zohran, you can hide. We charge you with hate and crime.” Posters featuring an image of the mayor with blood on his hands were prominently displayed at the event. The demonstrations followed two stabbing attacks that took place on Thursday afternoon on the Upper West Side. The suspect, identified as 51-year-old Raul Morales, allegedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” while targeting two separate victims blocks apart. One victim was Moshe Yezhak Grunhaus, a 50-year-old Jewish man stabbed outside his synagogue near Amsterdam Avenue and West 86th Street. The second victim was Chok Sung, a 57-year-old Asian man stabbed near West 84th Street and Central Park West. Morales was later arrested and charged with attempted murder and assault as hate crimes after being found barricaded inside a nearby NYC Housing Authority building. Police indicated that mental health issues may have played a role in the attacks. The protests were directly tied to recent controversy surrounding Mamdani’s public stance on Israel. The mayor had previously announced that his administration had explored avenues to arrest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on behalf of the International Criminal Court in the event of Netanyahu’s visit to New York for the United Nations General Assembly in September. Although the legal feasibility of such an action was ultimately deemed impossible, Mamdani continued to advocate for protests against Netanyahu. This rhetoric, critics argue, has contributed to a climate of tension and hostility toward Jewish residents. Jewish community leaders and activists have linked Mamdani’s anti-Israel rhetoric to increased incidents of antisemitism in the city. At the rally, speakers and attendees denounced the mayor and local policies, asserting that public safety has deteriorated under soft-on-crime legislation and inflammatory political discourse. Assembly Member Michael Novakhov formally called on the US Department of Justice to investigate New York City, New York State, and Mamdani for potential civil rights violations. He emphasized that Jewish New Yorkers should not have to conceal their identities. Moshe Spern, a history teacher with the United Jewish Teachers advocacy group, argued that rhetoric framing Israeli leaders as “war criminals” has created the conditions that led to the Upper West Side stabbings. Rabbi Avi Weiss condemned Mamdani for exacerbating divisions among communities, stating that the mayor was “throwing gasoline on the fire” by pitting groups against one another. The Jewish community has faced a surge in hate crimes in New York City, with 178 confirmed antisemitic incidents recorded between January and June 2026—accounting for 55% of all hate crimes in the city. Jews make up approximately 10% of the city’s population. Jewish community activists expressed deep concern over the growing threat, noting that the recent stabbings were not isolated incidents but rather symptoms of broader societal tensions. The #EndJewHatred movement highlighted that over 300 family members of 9/11 victims and more than 12,000 individuals have signed a petition urging Mamdani not to attend the 25th anniversary memorial at Ground Zero, citing his rhetoric on Islamist extremism as a contributing factor to the current climate of fear and hostility. The mayor himself has denied allegations that his anti-Israel comments have stoked antisemitism. During a press conference, Mamdani asserted that his critiques of Netanyahu were based on factual assessments rather than personal opinions. He emphasized his commitment to protecting all New Yorkers, regardless of their views. However, critics argue that his public statements, particularly the video in which he labeled Netanyahu a “war criminal” and accused Israel of committing “genocide,” have fueled resentment and anger within certain segments of the population. The video, which has been widely circulated online, has drawn sharp criticism from Jewish organizations and community leaders, who claim it has incited violence against Jewish residents. As the situation unfolds, the city faces mounting pressure to address the root causes of rising antisemitism and ensure the safety of all residents. The ongoing investigation into the stabbings and the scrutiny of Mamdani’s rhetoric suggest that the issue is far from resolved. With tensions continuing to escalate, the coming weeks will likely see further activism, legal challenges, and public debate over the role of political discourse in shaping community safety.
12 poročil
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 5 dneviNovoimenovani britanski zunanji minister Ed Miliband je ob prevzemu nove vloge izrazil zavezanost spoštovanju dediščine svojih staršev, beguncev iz holokavsta. Miliband, katerih starši so pobegnili pred nacističnim preganjanjem, je poudaril zgodovinsko vlogo Velike Britanije kot zatočišča in pozval na to dediščino, da bi vodila njegov diplomatski pristop.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se Milibandovo proizraelsko stališče označuje za napredno, poudarjajo pa se njegova osebna povezava z preživelimi holokavsta in njegovo zagovarjanje proti antisemitizmu.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports Ed Miliband's comments about honoring his Holocaust refugee parents and his appointment as UK foreign secretary. It provides context about his political background and views on antisemitism and Israel, aligning with cross-source consensus. However, it does not mention
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is generally neutral, but it emphasizes Miliband's Jewish heritage and critical stance toward Netanyahu, which may subtly favor progressive viewpoints. The article frames his appointment as significant due to his Jewish identity, potentially influencing reader perception.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 9 dnevi "Zame to pomeni ves svet": Igor Levit se vrača v Izrael - intervjuIgor Levit, znani pianist, ki je znan po svojem glasbenem talentu in politični zavezanosti, bo nastopil v Izraelu v dvorani Charlesa Bronfmana v Tel Avivu. Rojen v rusko-judovski družini in vzgojen v Nemčiji, je Levit glasno govoril o svoji podpori Izraelu, še posebej po napadih 7. oktobra.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek uravnoteženo predstavlja dejanja in izjave Igora Levita, poudarja pa tako njegov umetniški prispevek kot tudi njegovo politično stališče, ne da bi se očitno zavzemal za katero koli posebno perspektivo.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports Miliband's comments about honoring his parents and his appointment as foreign secretary. It mirrors the content of Article 0 and provides similar contextual information about his political career and views on Israel, consistent with cross-source consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): Similar to Article 0, the tone highlights Miliband's Jewish heritage and his critical stance toward Netanyahu, which may subtly favor progressive viewpoints. The emphasis on his Jewish identity during his appointment could influence reader interpretation.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 55pred 5 dneviJordan Perry, vodja gledališča v Portlandu v Oregonu, je postavil kontroverzno sporočilo, ki navaja: "Preden so bili Judje, je bilo ... 'Odiseja', da bi izpodbijali dojemanje antisemitizma. Perry je trdil, da je sodobni antisemitizem pretiran, predvsem kot obramba za izraelske politike na Bližnjem vzhodu. Lokalni judovski voditelji, vključno s predstavniki judovske federacije Portlanda, so sporočilo kritizirali kot zgodovinsko netočno in potencialno žaljivo. Opozorili so, da so sklicevanja na 'Žide' v današnjem ozračju občutljive, zlasti zaradi naraščajočega antisemitizma.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je polemika postavljena skozi lečo antisemitizma in kritike izraelske zunanje politike, s poudarkom na trditvi vodje, da je antisemitizem pretiran kot obramba Izraela.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article presents the theater manager's claim about antisemitism being 'exaggerated,' but lacks direct evidence or statements from the manager confirming this. It includes conflicting perspectives but fails to provide sufficient context or clarification on the controversy, leading to potential mi
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'sharply objected to the message' and implies the manager's intent may be controversial. The framing suggests the manager's position is unconventional, which may bias readers toward viewing his claim as questionable.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 60Objektivnost 55pred 5 dnevi Novi britanski judovski zunanji minister ima dolgo zgodovino podpore in nesoglasja z britanskimi Judi.Ed Miliband, ki je bil pred kratkim imenovan za britanskega zunanjega ministra, ima zapleteno zgodovino z britanskimi Judovi in izraelsko politiko. Kot sin preživelih holokavsta je poudarjal, da mora spoštovati zapuščino svojih staršev, medtem ko je služil v visoki vladni vlogi. Miliband se je dolgo nasprotoval antisemitizmu in kritiziral premierja Benjamina Netanjahua, vendar je njegov proizraelski stališče občasno pritegnilo kritiko judovskih skupin. Podpiral je simbolično glasovanje za priznanje palestinske države leta 2014 in izrazil zaskrbljenost zaradi civilnih žrtev med konfliktom v Gazi. Kljub tem sporom so judovske organizacije priznale njegovo splošno podporo Izraelu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek razpravlja o kontroverznih stališčih Milibanda o Izraelu in njegovem družinskem ozadju, predstavlja pa več pogledov, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal eno stran.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article only mentions the headline and does not provide substantive content about Miliband's history with Israel or his appointment. Without additional details, it is difficult to assess factual accuracy or alignment with other sources.
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article contains minimal content and no clear perspective or framing. While it doesn't overtly show bias, its lack of depth makes it challenging to evaluate objectivity or factual claims.
HaaretzNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 50Objektivnost 60pred 6 dneviV članku je obravnavan Ed Miliband, novoimenovani zunanji minister Združenega kraljestva, in preučeni njegovi zgodovinski odnosi z Izraelom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so Milibandove kritike izraelske politike označene kot del širšega progresivnega stališča, poudarjajo pa njegovo zagovarjanje palestinskih pravic in njegovo usklajevanje z levičarskimi stališči v mednarodnih zadevah.
Zakaj dejstva (50): The article provides limited information as it only mentions Ed Miliband's appointment as U.K. Foreign Secretary and references his history with Israel, but does not elaborate on specific policies, actions, or detailed background. Without additional context or sources, it is difficult to assess full
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone appears neutral, focusing on the appointment and historical context without overt bias. However, the lack of elaboration on Miliband's stance or policy positions may suggest an agenda to highlight his history with Israel rather than provide a balanced overview of his role.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenKonservativnopred 4 urami Na stotine ljudi je v New Yorku obsojalo Mamdanija po napadih z nožem.Na stotine protestnikov se je zbralo na zgornji zahodni strani New Yorka, da bi protestirali proti županu Zohranu Mamdaniju in ga obtožili spodbujanja ozračja sovraštva in nasilja po dveh napadih z nožem.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so protesti označeni kot odziv na retoriko župana Mamdanija proti Izraelu in njegove komentarje o morebitnih pravnih ukrepih proti premieru Netanjahuju.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenProgresivnopred 7 urami Osumljenec za napad na judovskega moškega v New Yorku obtožen poskusa umora kot zločin iz sovraštva.51-letni Raul Morales je bil obtožen zločina iz sovraštva, ker je med nasilnim incidentom v New Yorku domnevno zabodel dva posameznika, med njimi tudi judovskega moškega. Morales, ki je pridržan brez varščine in mu grozi do 40 let zapora, je priznal, da ni kriv za vse obtožbe.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je incident postavljen v širši kontekst protiizraelskih čustev in poudarjena kritika retorike župana Zohrana Mamdanija, ki prikazuje njegov protiizraelski odnos kot potencialno prispevek k sovraštvu do Judov.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenProgresivnopred 3 dnevi 10 namigov o tem, kako bi se lahko novi britanski zunanji minister Ed Miliband soočil z IzraelomV članku se razpravlja o imenovanju Ed Milibanda, pomembnega britanskega judovskega politika, za novega zunanjega ministra Združenega kraljestva pod premierjem Andyjem Burnhamom. V članku je poudarjena Milibandova judovska dediščina in zgodovina njegove družine kot preživelih holokavsta, pri čemer je navedeno, da so njegovi starši pobegnili pred nacističnim preganjanjem.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je Milibandovo imenovanje prikazano z vidika njegove judovske identitete in zgodovinskih povezav z holokavstom, hkrati pa je poudarjen njegov politični odnos do Laburistične stranke, ki ima zgodovinsko levičarske poglede.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenProgresivnopred 3 dnevi Nemški "dobri Judje" so mislili, da so varni, New York bi moral biti pozorenV članku se razpravlja o spornem videu župana New Yorka Zohrana Mamdanija, v katerem kritizira izraelskega premierja Benjamina Netanjahua, ga obtožuje, da je organiziral "strašen genocid" in poziva k aretaciji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek predstavlja močno kritično gledišče izraelskega vodstva, zlasti Netanjahuja, z uporabo čustveno napolnjenega jezika, kot so "strašen genocid", "bojni zločinec" in "ni dobrodošel v New Yorku".
i24NEWSNeodvisenProgresivnopred 3 dneviČlanek poroča, da se je župan New Yorka Mamdani soočil s kritiko za njegovo ravnanje z antisemitizmom po dvojnem nošenju, ki se je zgodilo na zgornji zahodni strani.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so izraženi nasprotni odzivi proti županu Mamdaniju zaradi njegovega stališča do antisemitizma, kar pomeni, da so njegove politike ali retorika poslabšale napetosti.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenProgresivnopred 3 dnevi Napadalec kriči 'Allahu Akbar', in v Manhattnu ubode dva možna antisemitska zločina sovraštvaDva moška sta bila 24. julija 2026 izbodena pred pravoslavno judovsko sinagogo na Manhattnu. Ena žrtev je bila identificirana kot judovska, druga pa je bila azijska. Očitne priče so poročale, da je napadalec med napadom zakričal "Allahu Akbar". Policija preiskuje, ali napad predstavlja zločin iz sovraštva, pri čemer je opozorila, da je lahko imela vlogo duševno zdravje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek prikazuje napad skozi lečo antisemitskih zločinov iz sovraštva in poudarja politične odzive judovskih voditeljev in izraelskih uradnikov.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenProgresivnopred 3 dnevi Napadalec, ki je kričal allahu akbar, v New Yorku zabodel žida s odvijačem.23. julija 2026 je v ločenih incidentih na Upper West Sideu New Yorka napadel dva moška, ki ju je napadel Raul Morales, ki je med napadi kričal "allahu akbar". Ena žrtev je bila judinja in je nosila kippo, druga pa je bila Azijka. Obe žrtvi sta bili zabodeni v trup in v stabilnem stanju odpeljani v Mount Sinai Medical Center.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se incident označuje kot potencialno antisemitski, poudarjajo pa identiteto židovske žrtve in čas blizu Tisha B'av, svečanega judovskega praznika.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
IL
