Preiskava je oprostila Andrewa Chaukeja, ker ni našla podlage za obtožbe.
Andrew Chauke, direktor javnega tožilstva v Južnem Gautengu, je bil po skoraj enoletni prekinitvi suspendiran. Odločitev je sledila preiskavi, ki jo je vodila upokojena sodnica ustavnega sodišča Bess Nkabinde, katere ugotovitve so pokazale, da obtožbe proti njemu niso utemeljene. Chauke je bil suspendiran julija 2025 na zahtevo nekdanje nacionalne direktorje javnega tožilstva Shamila Batohi, ki je izrazila zaskrbljenost zaradi obravnave več visokoprofilnih korupcijskih primerov, vključno s tistimi, ki so povezani s Praso, korupcijskim primerom v višini 1,2 milijarde dolarjev, v katerem je sodeloval Brian Hlongwa, in pregonom Richarda Mdlulija.
South Gauteng Director of Public Prosecutions Advocate Andrew Chauke has been cleared of all allegations and reinstated to his position following a comprehensive inquiry. The decision was announced after retired Constitutional Court Justice Bess Nkabinde submitted her findings to President Cyril Ramaphosa earlier this month. The inquiry concluded that there were no grounds to remove Chauke from office, clearing the way for his return to duty. Chauke had been on paid suspension since July 20, 2025, during which time he remained under investigation. His suspension followed a request from former National Director of Public Prosecutions Advocate Shamila Batohi, who had raised concerns about the withdrawal of several State Capture-related prosecutions and broader issues with the performance of the South Gauteng office. The Presidency had previously suspended Chauke, citing the potential risk to public confidence in the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) if he continued in office amid serious allegations. Throughout the past two years, Chauke has faced repeated accusations of shielding politically connected individuals from prosecution. Critics have claimed that he delayed or obstructed numerous high-profile corruption cases, allegations that formed a core part of the inquiry's examination. Among the specific matters scrutinized were claims that Chauke delayed prosecutions related to the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa), interfered in a long-running R1.2 billion corruption case involving former Gauteng Health MEC Brian Hlongwa, and refused to prosecute former Crime Intelligence boss Richard Mdluli on murder-related charges. Additionally, Chauke was criticized for authorizing racketeering charges against former KwaZulu-Natal Hawks head Johan Booysen and members of the Cato Manor organized crime unit. Critics argued that these charges lacked sufficient evidence. During the inquiry, which took place in Pretoria over several months, senior prosecutors, including Batohi, provided extensive testimony. In her evidence, Batohi accused Chauke of overstepping his prosecutorial authority and suggested that his actions in the Booysen case were politically motivated. She also stated that there was a strong prima facie case against Mdluli, which Chauke allegedly did not pursue, while pushing forward with the Booysen prosecution despite weak evidence. Chauke denied all the allegations. However, in December 2025, Batohi unexpectedly terminated her testimony and refused to continue with cross-examination without further consultation. This move drew criticism from Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development, which questioned the transparency and thoroughness of the process. Despite the controversy surrounding the inquiry, the final report from Justice Nkabinde has resulted in Chauke being deemed fit to resume his duties. The reinstatement marks the end of a prolonged period of scrutiny and political tension within the NPA. As the situation moves forward, attention will likely shift toward the implications of this decision for the integrity and functioning of the prosecutorial body.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Andrew Chauke, direktor javnega tožilstva v Južnem Gautengu, je bil po skoraj enoletni prekinitvi suspendiran. Odločitev je sledila preiskavi, ki jo je vodila upokojena sodnica ustavnega sodišča Bess Nkabinde, katere ugotovitve so pokazale, da obtožbe proti njemu niso utemeljene. Chauke je bil suspendiran julija 2025 na zahtevo nekdanje nacionalne direktorje javnega tožilstva Shamila Batohi, ki je izrazila zaskrbljenost zaradi obravnave več visokoprofilnih korupcijskih primerov, vključno s tistimi, ki so povezani s Praso, korupcijskim primerom v višini 1,2 milijarde dolarjev, v katerem je sodeloval Brian Hlongwa, in pregonom Richarda Mdlulija.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene ugotovitve neodvisne preiskave obtožb zoper Andrewa Chaukeja, v kateri so podrobno opisane obtožbe bivše tožilke Shamile Batohi in Chaukejeva zanikanja teh obtožb.
Članek poroča, da je preiskava razjasnila nekatere trditve Andrewa Chaukeja, pri čemer je bil priznan kot zdravnik južnoafriške ekipe Junior Springboks. Naslovnica to razjasnitev označuje kot opazen dogodek med "Danesnimi 7 najboljšimi zgodbami", kar kaže, da se šteje za pomembno novico.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Tema se nanaša na šport in ne vključuje politično nabitih tem, kot so vlada, volitve ali javna politika.
Južnoafriški tožilec Andrew Chauke je bil po preiskavi o njegovi primernosti za službo očiščen, kar je končalo skoraj dveletno prekinitev. Preiskava, ki jo je vodil upokojeni sodnik ustavnega sodišča Baaitse Nkabinde, je zaključila, da je Chauke primeren za ponovni začetek svoje vloge direktorja javnega tožilstva v Južnem Gautengu. Preiskava je preučevala obtožbe, da je Chauke odložil ali oviral visoke korupcijske primere, vključno s tistimi, ki so povezani s Praso, korupcijskim primerom v višini R1,2 milijarde, v katerem je sodeloval Brian Hwa, in pregonom Richarda Mdlulija. Nekdanja nacionalna direktorica javnega tožilstva Shamila Batohi je izrazila zaskrbljenost zaradi teh dejanj, obtožila Chaukeja politično motiviranih odločitev in neuspeha v preganjanju močnih primerov. Vendar je Chauke obtožbe zanikal, preiskava pa je na koncu odločila v njegovo korist.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene tako obtožbe, ki jih je vložila Shamila Batohi, kot tudi ugotovitve preiskave, ki je oprostila Andrewa Chaukea.
Južnoafriški tožilec Andrew Chauke je bil po preiskavi razrešen prekrškov in se bo vrnil v svojo vlogo direktorja javnega tožilstva v Južnem Gautengu. Preiskava, ki jo je vodil upokojeni sodnik ustavnega sodišča Baaitse Nkabinde, je ugotovila, da Chauke ni storil nič narobe in je tako končal svojo skoraj dvigodiščno prekinitev. Preiskava je preučevala obtožbe, da je Chauke odložil ali oviral visoke korupcijske primere, vključno s tistimi, ki so povezani s Praso, korupcijskim primerom v višini 1,2 milijarde dolarjev, v katerem je bil vpleteni Brian Hlongwa, in pregonom Richarda Mdlulija.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene obtožbe zoper Chaukeja in njegovo zanikanje teh obtožb, pri čemer se navajajo pričevanja Batohija in drugih virov.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
ZA
