Allan Titford je dobil pogojni izpust pri desetem poskusu.

Allan Titford, a prominent Northland farmer and former anti-Treaty activist, was granted parole on his tenth attempt following nearly 13 years in prison. The decision came after a lengthy legal process and multiple parole board reviews. Titford, now in his mid-60s, appeared before the Parole Board for the final time, where he was assessed on his readiness for release. Titford was initially sentenced to 24 years in prison in 2013 after being found guilty of 39 charges, including rape of his wife, violence against his children, perjury, obstructing justice, and setting fire to his own home. He blamed the arson attack on local Māori. The jury acquitted him on 14 other charges, such as additional rape allegations and threats of harm. His case drew significant attention due to the severity of the convictions and the high-profile nature of the trial. During the latest parole review, Titford faced repeated questioning about the offenses he was convicted of. When asked if he had harmed his children, he refused to give a direct answer, instead deflecting by suggesting that some of his children had withdrawn their statements after becoming parents themselves. He claimed that difficulties within the family were caused by interference from grandparents and teachers. Despite this, he acknowledged his conviction and stated he would uphold his stance until "hell freezes over." Correction officers noted that Titford had maintained good behavior throughout his incarceration. A prison officer praised his efforts in managing the prison’s recycling program and his respectful treatment of both staff and fellow inmates. His case manager reported that the transition to life outside prison had begun smoothly, with a successful visit to his future residence and a positive initial meeting with his brother, whom he had not seen in years. Titford described his time in prison as "the friendliest environment I've ever lived in." This was partly attributed to his role within the facility, which made him well known among both prisoners and staff. During the hearing, he expressed plans to engage in court battles upon release, targeting the Far North District Council over property disputes, a power company, and efforts to reclaim a seized fishing trawler. He also mentioned his intention to continue his education by joining language classes, calling learning Spanish a personal passion. Parole conditions include restrictions on travel, a curfew, electronic monitoring, and a prohibition on firearm possession. Titford will be required to stay south of the Brynderwyn Hills, which mark the boundary between Auckland and Northland, and avoid Pukekohe in South Auckland. These measures aim to ensure his compliance with the terms of his release while allowing him to live in a rural area of the North Island. Judge Duncan Harvey, who presided over Titford’s original sentencing, had described his actions as a "reign of terror" against his wife and family. The judge noted that Titford had attempted to gain public sympathy by damaging his own equipment and burning down his farmhouse, which led to widespread media coverage. These acts, according to the judge, were part of a broader pattern of behavior that justified the long prison term. Titford’s case highlights the complex interplay between personal history, legal consequences, and societal expectations. As he prepares for life beyond prison, the focus remains on the practical steps he must take to reintegrate into society under strict supervision.