ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Posel, hočeš, da ostane v družini?
ZA🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 5 urami

Posel, hočeš, da ostane v družini?

V članku so razpravljali o izzivih in dinamiki družinskih podjetij, pri čemer so uporabili primere, kot sta Dis-Chem in Bell Equipment. V članku je poudarjena odstopitev Saula Saltzmana, sina ustanoviteljev Dis-Chem, iz odbora in Ashley Bell, vnuka ustanovitelja Bell Equipment, iz vloge izvršnega direktorja. Avtor razmišlja o potencialnih prednostih družinskih podjetij - zaupanju, skupnih vrednotah in dolgoročni viziji -, vendar tudi izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi nepotizma, omejenega napredovanja v karieri za člane, ki niso družinski člani, in etičnih tveganj, zlasti s sklicevanjem na domnevno kršitev družine Trump. Članek nasprotuje družinskim podjetjem, kot je Pick n Pay, z drugimi, kot je Shoprite, in predlaga, da lahko družinske strukture vodijo k uspehu, vendar lahko tudi ovirajo inovacije in preglednost.

Saul Saltzman, son of the founders of South African pharmacy chain Dis-Chem, has resigned from the board of the company. According to reports, Saltzman will remain a shareholder but will no longer hold a formal role within the organization. This marks a notable shift in the leadership structure of a family-owned enterprise that has operated for decades. Saltzman's departure follows a pattern observed in several prominent family-run businesses in South Africa. These include Pick n Pay, founded by Raymond Ackerman and later expanded by multiple generations of the Ackerman family, and Bell Equipment, established by Irvine Bell in 1954. Bell’s company, which initially served cane farmers, grew into an international operation spanning 80 countries. Recently, Bell’s grandson, Ashley Bell, stepped down as CEO to focus on another venture he had previously launched. The dynamics of family businesses often involve complex relationships between personal and professional lives. In many cases, family members bring shared values, trust, and a sense of legacy to the table. However, such structures can also lead to challenges, particularly when generational differences or competing interests arise. For instance, the Ackerman family faced difficulties maintaining competitiveness against larger rivals like Shoprite, despite their early success. Family firms can offer unique advantages. They may foster a culture of loyalty and collaboration, with decision-making processes shaped by mutual understanding. Yet, these benefits come with potential drawbacks. As noted in discussions around family enterprises, individuals outside the immediate family may struggle to gain equal recognition or advancement opportunities. This could create barriers for talented outsiders seeking to contribute to the growth of the business. The case of the Trump family highlights a different dimension of family involvement in business. Here, the interplay of familial ties and questionable business practices has raised concerns about ethical conduct and accountability. It underscores how close-knit family networks can influence both opportunity and risk, potentially shielding certain members from scrutiny while enabling others to benefit disproportionately. For employees within family businesses, the balance between personal and professional life can be delicate. Some describe the experience as a form of emotional respite, where the stress of work is temporarily set aside once they return home. Conversely, the pressures of family expectations and internal politics can complicate workplace dynamics, especially for younger professionals aiming for upward mobility. The transition of leadership in family businesses often reflects broader trends in corporate governance. As industries evolve and competition intensifies, the need for diverse perspectives and external expertise becomes increasingly apparent. This has led some family firms to reconsider traditional models of succession and management, embracing more open structures that allow for greater flexibility and innovation. Saltzman’s resignation raises questions about the future direction of Dis-Chem. With a long history rooted in family ownership, the company now faces the challenge of adapting to changing market conditions while navigating the complexities of internal dynamics. How the board responds to this change will likely shape the trajectory of the business moving forward.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Pojdite k primarnim virom (2)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

1 poročil

Daily Maverick logoDaily MaverickNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 60pred 5 urami
Posel, hočeš, da ostane v družini?

V članku so razpravljali o izzivih in dinamiki družinskih podjetij, pri čemer so uporabili primere, kot sta Dis-Chem in Bell Equipment. V članku je poudarjena odstopitev Saula Saltzmana, sina ustanoviteljev Dis-Chem, iz odbora in Ashley Bell, vnuka ustanovitelja Bell Equipment, iz vloge izvršnega direktorja. Avtor razmišlja o potencialnih prednostih družinskih podjetij - zaupanju, skupnih vrednotah in dolgoročni viziji -, vendar tudi izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi nepotizma, omejenega napredovanja v karieri za člane, ki niso družinski člani, in etičnih tveganj, zlasti s sklicevanjem na domnevno kršitev družine Trump. Članek nasprotuje družinskim podjetjem, kot je Pick n Pay, z drugimi, kot je Shoprite, in predlaga, da lahko družinske strukture vodijo k uspehu, vendar lahko tudi ovirajo inovacije in preglednost.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Čeprav se članek dotakne družinskih podjetij in se sklicuje na družino Trump, ne zavzema jasnega ideološkega stališča.

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article mentions Saul Saltzman resigning from the board of Dis-Chem, but does not mention Ashley Bell resigning from Bell Equipment. It references Bell Equipment and its founder Irvine Bell but incorrectly attributes the resignation to Saul Saltzman rather than Ashley Bell. This creates confusio

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone is informal and opinionated, using phrases like 'I am always fascinated' and 'Grootes Grumpiness.' The author speculates about the reasons for corporate decline and makes comparisons between companies without presenting balanced perspectives.

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe