The ongoing impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte has taken another significant turn as her legal team expressed openness to having the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) box containing her tax records opened—but only in a confidential session. This development comes after the House of Representatives initially subpoenaed the documents during clarificatory hearings related to the impeachment complaint against Duterte. However, concerns about potential violations of the National Internal Revenue Code led lawmakers to refrain from opening the box publicly. Now, the focus has shifted to whether the documents can be examined in a closed-door setting, raising questions about transparency and legal procedures within the impeachment process.
According to a detailed response submitted by Duterte’s defense team on June 26, they emphasized that they were not opposed to the idea of opening the BIR box, provided that the session remained confidential. Their statement clarified that participants involved in the opening and pre-marking of the box should be strictly prohibited from disclosing any information to the public. Furthermore, the defense argued that the documents contained in the box pertained to periods when Duterte was not yet an impeachable official. They pointed to previous submissions, including their answer dated May 25, 2026, and pre-trial brief dated June 15, 2026, which highlighted that these records could not form the basis of any impeachable offense since they relate to a time before she assumed such a position.
Despite the defense’s willingness to proceed under confidentiality, the prosecution panel voiced skepticism about the necessity of holding the session in private. During a press conference on June 29, public prosecutor Leila de Lima, representing the party-list group Mamamayang Liberal, questioned why an executive session was required. She suggested that a simple assignment of a team to open the box and mark its contents would suffice. This exchange underscored the differing perspectives between the two sides regarding procedural requirements and the implications of handling sensitive financial information.
The controversy surrounding the BIR box reflects broader challenges faced by the impeachment court as it navigates the delicate balance between ensuring transparency and protecting individuals' privacy rights. The prosecution aims to use the tax records as crucial evidence to support their claim that Duterte amassed ill-gotten wealth, thereby justifying the impeachment proceedings. Meanwhile, the defense continues to challenge the relevance and admissibility of the documents, arguing that they pertain to a period when Duterte was not subject to impeachment.
As the situation unfolds, attention remains focused on the pre-trial proceedings scheduled for the upcoming days. The House has indicated that a pre-trial order for the impeachment case is expected to be issued by Monday, according to reports from the House clerk of court. This development signals an imminent phase in the legal battle, where both sides will have the opportunity to further articulate their positions and prepare for the subsequent stages of the trial.
In parallel, the prosecution has continued to strengthen its team, with recent announcements highlighting the appointment of former Surigao del Norte 2nd District representative Robert Ace Barbers as an impeachment trial adviser and spokesperson. His extensive legislative experience and involvement in past investigations into high-profile cases are seen as valuable assets to the prosecution’s efforts. Alongside Barbers, other notable figures have joined the prosecution team, including representatives and private prosecutors known for their expertise in legal matters. These additions reflect the growing complexity of the impeachment case and the commitment of the prosecution to thoroughly address the allegations against Vice President Sara Duterte.
6 poročil
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 17 dneviPodpredsednica Sara Duterte se sooča s sodnim postopkom zaradi obtožb, vključno z zlorabo tajnih sredstev, podkupovanjem, kopičenjem nepojasnjenega bogastva in načrtovanjem atentata na visoke osebnosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so objektivno predstavljeni okoliščine, citirani so tako obtoženi kot tožilec, ne da bi se očitno naklonil nobeni strani, poudarjena je potreba po nepristranskosti v sojenju in uravnotežen kontekst obtožb in postopka.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 85): Accurately reflects statements from Diokno and the allegations against Duterte. Maintains neutrality in presenting perspectives without overt bias.
RapplerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 80pred 10 dneviPravna ekipa podpredsednice Sare Duterte je izrazila pripravljenost odpreti zapečateno škatlo, ki vsebuje njene davčne zapise pred odborom za pravosodje, vendar vztraja, da se mora to zgoditi na zaupnem izvršilnem zasedanju. Trdijo, da se dokumenti, ki zajemajo obdobja, ko Duterte ni bil uradnik, ki ga je mogoče obtožiti, ne morejo uporabiti kot dokaz za kakršne koli kaznive dejanja, ki jih je mogoče obtožiti. Tožilstvo pa je dvomilo v potrebo po tajnosti in predlagalo, da bi lahko škatlo odprli javno z ustreznimi zaščitnimi ukrepi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja stališče obrambe, ki poudarja zaupnost in nepomembnost preteklih davčnih evidenc za sedanje obtožbe, in nasprotne argumente tožilstva, ki sprašujejo o potrebi po tajnosti.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 80): Accurately reports the defense team's position on opening the BIR box in an executive session. Factual details align with the provided text. Objectivity slightly reduced by the focus on the defense's stance without equal emphasis on the prosecution's perspective.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 87Objektivnost 80pred 17 dnevi Poslanci: Filipinci čakajo na odgovor Sare Duterte na obtožbeFilipinski zakonodajalci pozivajo podpredsednico Saro Duterte, naj javno obravnava obtožbe, ki jih je zoper njo vložil Predstavni dom. Obtožbe vključujejo obtožbe o korupciji, zlorabi javnih sredstev, ustavnih kršitvah in grožnjah proti visokim osebnostim.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja situacijo, navaja več zakonodajalcev in navaja obtožbe in postopkovne korake, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 87 · Objektivnost 80): Accurate information on Escudero's potential role. Objectivity is slightly skewed by the critical stance towards his credibility.
GMA News OnlineNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 90pred 13 dneviČlanek poroča, da se pričakuje, da bo do ponedeljka izdan predsojni nalog za primer umika proti Sari Duterte. Informacije izvirajo iz Bantuga, lokalne novice, povezane z mrežo GMA. Osredotočen je na pravne postopke v zvezi s potencialnim umikom Sare Duterte, ki je hči nekdanjega predsednika Rodrigoja Duterteja in trenutno služi kot župan mesta Davao. Članek poudarja predvideni časovni okvir za izdajo predsojnega ukaza, kar kaže, da se proces nadaljuje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije v zvezi s pravnim procesom, ki je obkrožil primer opozarjanja proti Sari Duterte, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli posebno politično stališče.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 90): Brief and factual statement about the pre-trial order. Neutral in tone.
RapplerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 9 dnevi Tožilstvo pravi, da sodišče ne bi smelo zavrniti primera Sare Duterte brez sojenja.Članek poroča o več novicah. Ena se osredotoča na nasprotovanje filipinskega tožilstva senatnemu sodišču za impeachment, ki je zavrnilo primer za impeachment podpredsednice Sare Duterte brez sojenja in trdi, da bi to kršilo ustavo. Druga točka omenja Mednarodno kazensko sodišče, ki je ukazalo zamrznitev sredstev, zaseženih od nekdanjega predsednika Rodrigo Duterteja med aretacijo. Dodatne zgodbe pokrivajo filipinske vodilne globalne sončne naložbe zaradi naraščajočih stroškov energije, morebitnih sprememb cen goriva zaradi napetosti na Bližnjem vzhodu in začasnega premirja med Iranom in Združenimi državami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja več novic z različnimi stopnjami političnega naboja. Medtem ko je primer impeachmenta, ki vključuje Saro Duterte, politično nabito vprašanje, članek ne zavzema jasnega ideološkega stališča o zadevi.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 75): Factuality is high as the article reports on known developments related to Sara Duterte's impeachment and international legal actions against Duterte. Objectivity is moderate as it presents political positions without overt bias but lacks depth on broader implications.
RapplerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 80pred 10 dnevi Ace Barbers imenovan za svetovalca tožilstva v procesu obtožbe Sare DutertePredstavniški dom na Filipinih je imenoval nekdanjega kongresnika Roberta Aceja Barbersa za svetovalca in predstavnika ekipe tožilstva v procesu obtožbe podpredsednice Sare Duterte. Barbers, znan po svojih obsežnih zakonodajnih izkušnjah in vodilnih vlog v ključnih odborih, vključno s štirikratnim odborom, ki je preiskal obtožbe proti nekdanjemu predsedniku Rodrigo Duterteju, bo pomagal komunicirati proces obtožbe javnosti. Predstavniški dom je tudi razširil svojo ekipo tožilstva z dodajanjem štirih zasebnih odvetnikov, s čimer se je skupno število zasebnih tožilcev povezalo na 15.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o sestavi in strategiji tožilske ekipe v procesu impeachmenta, ne da bi se odkrito naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 80 · Objektivnost 80): Factuality is good as it accurately describes the appointment of Ace Barbers and provides relevant background. Objectivity is strong as it remains neutral, presenting facts without emotional language or clear ideological slant.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
PH
