India🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnopred 28 dnevi

'Aap BJP ke ho kya?' Rahulov odgovor na vprašanje o policistih, ki so bili poškodovani med protestom študentov

Rahul Gandhi, vodja opozicije v Lok Sabhi, je ostro odgovoril na vprašanje novinarja o tiskovni konferenci, ki so jo 20. julija v New Delhiju organizirale družine policistov Delhija, ki so bili poškodovani med študentskimi protesti. Družine so delile svoje izkušnje in opisovale čustveno travmo, ki so jo utrpele policisti med spopadi. Žena enega policista je pripovedovala bolečino, ko je videla, da se je njen mož vrnil domov poškodovan, medtem ko je drugi družinski član obtožil proteste, da jih manipulirajo neštudentski elementi, katerih cilj je spodkopati zakoniti študentski aktivizem.

CJP’s Saurav Das has publicly endorsed Rahul Gandhi’s allegations that Union Home Minister Amit Shah ordered the use of force during the July 20 student protest crackdown, calling for accountability. Speaking on social media platform X, Das cited Gandhi’s claims that the home minister “put the pellets into the blood of our students” and “ordered the students of India to be shot.” This followed Gandhi’s remarks in the Lok Sabha during the anti-paper leak debate, where he accused Amit Shah of authorizing the use of pellet guns and other tactics against protesters. According to reports, Gandhi claimed that either Amit Shah gave the firing order or was unaware of the police action, labeling the latter as “incompetence.” Das emphasized that the home minister must answer for the alleged brutality, noting that a student lost his vision due to the “order” given by the minister. The controversy erupted after Rahul Gandhi accused Amit Shah of orchestrating the use of force during the July 20 protest, which was part of a larger movement demanding the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The protest, known as the “Sansad Chalo” march, ended in clashes between protesters and security forces, with allegations of excessive force, including the use of pellet guns. A dairy entry from the Parliament Street police station, dated July 22, confirmed that at least two rounds of pellets were used on the orders of a deputy superintendent of police. This document, shared with Hindustan Times, marked the first official acknowledgment of pellet gun deployment during the protest. Despite this, Union Minister Jitendra Singh dismissed Gandhi’s claims, asserting that orders for police firing are issued by magistrates, not ministers. The backlash against Gandhi’s remarks was swift. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju challenged the opposition leader, demanding evidence to support his accusations. Rijiju argued that such allegations in the Lok Sabha require prior notice and proof, warning that Gandhi’s remarks constituted a breach of Amit Shah’s privileges. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla reiterated the House’s rules, emphasizing that unsubstantiated claims are not permissible in parliamentary debates. Rijiju also criticized Gandhi for failing to engage meaningfully with the paper leak bill, accusing him of making “unparliamentary” remarks. Meanwhile, the BJP continued to accuse Gandhi of spreading misinformation, with some lawmakers calling for disciplinary action against him. Amid the political tensions, the families of Delhi Police personnel injured during the protest held a press conference, appealing for justice. They claimed that several officers were still receiving medical treatment and that their suffering had been overlooked amidst allegations of police brutality. One family member, the daughter of an injured Delhi Police sub-inspector, alleged that her father was “pulled by a rowdy mob and was almost lynched near the stage at Jantar Mantar.” She described the incident as leaving her father unconscious for nearly four hours. Other relatives accused the authorities of targeting innocent students instead of “habitual offenders,” suggesting a broader strategy to deter dissent. These claims were echoed by Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), who accused the BJP of sending “goons” to disrupt the protest and harm police personnel. Rahul Gandhi, in response to the press conference, reiterated his call for an independent Supreme Court-monitored inquiry into the police action. On X, he shared a video allegedly showing clashes between protesters and police, including instances of lathi-charges and the forced removal of a student carrying the Indian flag. He also condemned the government for allegedly intimidating youth and threatening their right to protest. The Congress leader urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to take action against Amit Shah, arguing that the minister’s presence in the House was “scarcely visible” despite his alleged involvement in the crackdown. This rhetoric intensified the political feud, with BJP MPs moving a privilege notice against Gandhi over his remarks, while Congress allies threatened similar measures against Jitendra Singh for allegedly misleading the House. The situation continues to evolve, with calls for transparency and accountability growing louder. As the CJP’s 37-day-long protest at Jantar Mantar draws to a close, the focus remains on the alleged misuse of force and the need for impartial investigations. With multiple parties vying for narrative control, the outcome of these developments could shape the trajectory of political discourse in the coming weeks. For now, the spotlight remains on the unresolved questions surrounding the July 20 protest and the responsibilities of those in power.

5 poročil

Hindustan TimesNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 70Objektivnost 6030. 7. 2026

CJP-jev Saurav Das podpira Rahul Gandhijeve trditve proti Amit Shah-u: "Moral je odgovarjati"

Predsednik kongresa Rahul Gandhi je obtožil ministra za notranje zadeve Amit Shah, da je ukazal uporabo peletskih pištol med protestom študentov 20. julija, trdil pa je, da je Shah odobril streljanje, ki je povzročilo poškodbe.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so obtožbe Rahul Gandhija proti Amit Shah v obliki, ki podpirajo trditev, z uporabo fraz, kot so "mora biti odgovoren" in poudarja resnost incidenta.

Zakaj dejstva (70): The article covers Abhijeet Dipke's criticism of PM Modi and the ongoing harassment of protesters, which aligns with the primary source document's context of the CJP protests. It includes direct quotes from Dipke and references to the ongoing issues faced by protesters.

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article has a somewhat confrontational tone, especially in Dipke's comments, and presents the situation from the perspective of the protesters. It lacks balance by not giving equal weight to opposing viewpoints.

Hindustan TimesNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 50pred 29 dnevi

'BJP ke ho kya?': Odgovor Rahul Gandhija novinarju na preser Delhijske policije

Družine delhijskih policistov, ki so bili poškodovani med protestom študentov na Jantar Mantarju, so se nedavno obrnile na medije in zahtevale pravico za svoje ljubljene in trdile, da jih je napadla množica. Kongresni vodja Rahul Gandhi, ko so ga vprašali o tiskovni konferenci, je sarkastično vprašal: "Aap BJP ke ho kya?" (Ali ste iz BJP?), kar kaže na morebitno politično pristranskost.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je postavljeno Rahulovo vprašanje novinarjem kot oster kritik BJP, s sarkazmom ("Aap BJP ke ho kya?"), da bi namigoval na politično pristranskost.

Zakaj dejstva (60): The article discusses Rahul Gandhi's response to a press conference by families of injured Delhi Police personnel, which is unrelated to the primary source document about Jharkhand student protests. The factual claims are not supported by the primary source, which focuses on Jharkhand, not Delhi. Th

Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'threaten Gen Z into silence' and frames the situation as a conflict between the government and students. It presents Rahul Gandhi's stance without providing balanced context or counterpoints, thus lacking neutrality.

Times of IndiaNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 5030. 7. 2026

'Učenci si zaslužijo pravico': Rahul deli protestni video, v katerem trdi, da je policija surova

Rahul Gandhi, vodja opozicije v Lok Sabhi, je zahteval neodvisno preiskavo, ki jo bo nadzorovalo vrhovno sodišče, v zvezi z domnevno policijsko brutalnostjo proti študentom, ki so protestirali proti tekočim škandalom s puškami papirja 20. julija.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je razvidna polemika okoli obtožb Rahul Gandhija zoper vlado in Amit Shah, z uporabo čustvenega jezika, kot so "brutalnosti", "kriv za brutalizacijo" in "zgrabi naslovnico".

Zakaj dejstva (60): The article focuses on Rahul Gandhi's allegations against Amit Shah and does not directly address the use of pellet guns or the primary source document's details. It lacks direct references to the pellet gun incidents or the medical reports mentioned in the primary source. The facts presented are li

Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article is highly biased toward Rahul Gandhi's accusations and frames the situation as a political conflict. It uses emotionally charged language and presents the narrative from the opposition's viewpoint, lacking neutrality.

Hindustan TimesNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 55Objektivnost 45pred 28 dnevi

'BJP-jevi nasilneži, ne študenti, so napadli policijo': Dipke izraža sočutje s policisti iz Delhija, ki so bili poškodovani med protesti na Jantar Mantarju

Abhijeet Dipke, ustanovitelj stranke Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), je izrazil sočutje s policisti iz Delhija, ki so bili poškodovani med protestom na Jantar Mantarju, medtem ko je BJP obtožil, da je poslal "goone" za napad na policijo in motenje demonstracije. Dipke je trdil, da študenti niso odgovorni za nasilje proti policiji in trdil, da vlada cilja na nedolžne študente, da bi odvrnila prihodnje proteste. Predlagal je, da bi se morali po zakonu obravnavati navadni prestopniki, ne pa študenti.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je incident označen kot politično motiviran napad BJP-jevih 'goons' proti policiji, kar pomeni nasilje, ki ga sponzorira država.

Zakaj dejstva (55): The article discusses a political statement by a former BJP spokesperson and does not provide any information about the pellet gun incidents or the primary source document. It focuses on internal party dynamics rather than the main event.

Zakaj objektivnost (45): The tone is supportive of the BJP and critical of the opposition, showing a clear political bias. The language is emotive and lacks objectivity, reflecting a partisan stance.

Times of IndiaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 50Objektivnost 40pred 29 dnevi

'Aap BJP ke ho kya?' Rahulov odgovor na vprašanje o policistih, ki so bili poškodovani med protestom študentov

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis situacije, pri čemer navaja odgovore Rahul Gandhija in izjave družin poškodovanih policistov.

Zakaj dejstva (50): The article discusses the Cockroach Janta Party's defense of a woman booked for abusive remarks against PM Modi, which is unrelated to the primary source document about Jharkhand student protests. The factual claims are not supported by the primary source, which focuses on Jharkhand, not Delhi or th

Zakaj objektivnost (40): The article uses biased language such as 'harassment of the young must STOP immediately' and frames the situation as an attack on free speech. It lacks balance by not presenting the government's perspective or the legal rationale for the FIR.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe

V Maharashtri so v fotokopirskem centru Navi Mumbai našli 3.400 obrazcev SIR, pet uradnikov je bilo suspendiranih

Sredina2 viripred 5 urami

Bengalski novi svetovni red, 100 dni.

Sredina5 virivčeraj

Zakaj se je JP Nadda sestal z protestujočimi proti rezervacijam in kaj hoče BJP

Bolj konservativno3 virivčeraj

Mati se spominja sinovega umora v "narkotikatski vojni" in "strašenja", ki je sledilo

Progresivno1 virpred 4 urami

Opozicija, uporabniki naletijo na BJP vlado zaradi Gurugrama, ki se je po dežju ponovno zataknil.

Sredina3 viripred 5 urami

Denar, policisti in morilci: v enem zanimivem tednu v Madlanga

Bolj progresivno2 viripred 5 urami