88 smrti: Redki protest na IIT Delhiju po samomoru študenta je sprožil jezo

IIT Delhi Director Rangan Banerjee has issued a stern warning against students engaging in disruptive behavior during ongoing protests over the alleged suicide of a 31-year-old MSc Physics student. Banerjee described the actions as “unsavoury, threatening” and emphasized that they compromise the safety and peace of faculty members and their families. The protests, which have lasted six days, began after the student reportedly jumped from a building on the campus on August 22. The protests escalated significantly on Thursday night, with demonstrators reaching the campus residential areas. In an email sent to students on Friday, Banerjee outlined that a group of protesters gathered outside faculty housing between 10.30 PM and 12.30 AM. They used “unsavoury, humiliating and threatening language in their slogans,” according to the message. He stressed that such conduct undermines the institution’s ability to function peacefully and called for disciplinary measures against those responsible. The university has taken steps to address the situation, forming a new external probe panel to investigate the circumstances surrounding the student’s death. Retired Delhi High Court Judge Mukta Gupta has been appointed as the head of this panel. This follows the withdrawal of former Uttarakhand DGP Ashok Kumar, who had initially been named chair of the inquiry but recused himself citing “personal reasons.” Despite these developments, student demonstrations continue on campus, driven by demands for an independent inquiry, accountability from institutional authorities, and financial support for the deceased student’s family. Students have been staging protests daily since the incident, with tensions rising as the situation persists. The protests have drawn attention beyond the campus, prompting calls for systemic changes within the educational framework. A prominent figure, Dipke, has publicly demanded a complete overhaul of the education system, expressing concern over the broader implications of the case. His comments reflect growing frustration among educators and activists who see the incident as indicative of deeper issues within higher education institutions. The university administration has maintained a firm stance, asserting that disruptions to campus life must be addressed through formal disciplinary procedures. Banerjee’s directive underscores the institution’s commitment to maintaining order while acknowledging the emotional weight of the situation. Faculty members and their families have reportedly felt targeted by the protests, with some reporting heightened anxiety due to the presence of demonstrators near their residences. As the investigation into the student’s death proceeds, the focus remains on resolving the immediate concerns raised by the community. The new probe panel is expected to begin its work soon, although the exact timeline for its findings has not yet been announced. Meanwhile, students continue to gather on campus, advocating for transparency and justice. The situation highlights the complex interplay between institutional governance and public sentiment, with both sides seeking resolution through different means. The incident has sparked a wider conversation about mental health support systems within academic environments and the role of universities in addressing student well-being. As the probe moves forward, the outcome could influence policy reforms and administrative practices at IIT Delhi and potentially other institutions across India. For now, the campus remains under watch, with the balance between protest and institutional control being carefully managed.