Yemen's Southern Transitional Council (STC) has accused the newly installed Saudi Arabia-aligned National Shield Forces of failing to curb rampant Houthi smuggling activities, which it claims have created conditions for a potential naval blockade of the Red Sea. This development follows the STC's withdrawal from southern Yemen earlier this year after a pro-Saudi military operation forced them out of key positions. The STC alleges that the shift in control has allowed Houthi-aligned networks to expand smuggling routes from the Horn of Africa into northern Yemen, thereby strengthening the Iran-backed group's position. Since January, the National Shield Forces have taken charge of security and counter-terrorism operations in southern Yemen, displacing STC units that had previously managed these duties. According to Amr Al Bidh, a former STC spokesman, the transition left a security vacuum that has enabled Houthi smuggling to flourish. Smuggling routes from the Horn of Africa to Houthi-controlled areas in northern Yemen have expanded significantly, he said, contributing to the group's growing influence and capability. Al Bidh criticized Saudi Arabia's intervention in southern Yemen, calling it a strategic error that has inadvertently strengthened the Houthis and other extremist groups. He argued that the STC's removal from power eliminated a crucial deterrent against Houthi aggression and disrupted the balance of power in the region. The STC continues to assert that the current government forces are ineffective in addressing Yemen's security challenges, despite their formal alignment with the internationally recognized government based in Aden. In addition to the Houthi threat, concerns have emerged regarding the increasing visibility of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in the central Hadhramaut province, particularly in the city of Mukalla. AQAP's movements have become more pronounced, according to Al Bidh, alongside the activities of the Somali Islamist group Al Shabab, which is reportedly involved in smuggling operations that support Houthi networks. These developments suggest a complex interplay of local and regional actors in the ongoing conflict. The National Shield Forces, tasked with maintaining security in southern Yemen, are still in the process of establishing a cohesive command structure. Recruitment efforts have focused primarily on tribal loyalists to the Saudi-backed administration. The first division defending against Houthi advances is led by Ali Al Shami and Rashid Alwan, while Anan Zariq al Qamishi heads the second division in Hadhramaut. Despite leadership changes, reports indicate that the overall situation remains stagnant, with little progress in curbing smuggling or improving security. Meanwhile, the Houthi group has declared a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia, a move that has drawn sharp condemnation from Riyadh. Saudi Arabia dismissed the Houthi announcement as disinformation and warned of potential escalation in the Red Sea. A closure of the Bab Al Mandeb strait, a vital maritime chokepoint, could severely impact Saudi oil exports to Asia and disrupt regional trade. The Saudi-led coalition emphasized that any claims of a blockade were unfounded and urged the Houthis to engage in dialogue rather than resorting to threats. The United Nations has also expressed concern over the potential for further regional instability, urging all parties to resolve disputes through diplomatic means. Analysts warn that any actual implementation of the Houthi blockade could have far-reaching consequences, given the strategic importance of the Red Sea for global trade. As tensions continue to mount, the effectiveness of the National Shield Forces in securing southern Yemen will remain under close scrutiny, with implications for both regional stability and the broader conflict dynamics in Yemen.
6 izvještaja
The NationalStranački povezanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prije 17 danaČlanak izvještava o pogoršanju odnosa između Saudijske Arabije i jemenskih pobunjenika Hutija, koji su uključeni u krhki prekid vatre koji je sada ugrožen.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se sukob prikazuje kao borba protiv navodnog miješanja Saudijske Arabije i naglašava geopolitičke dimenzije koje uključuju Iran i Sjedinjene Države.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports the recent military exchange between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis, citing specific events such as the airstrike on Sanaa International Airport and the Houthi attack on Abha International Airport. It references the geopolitical tensions and the role of Iran, aligning wi
Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone leans toward portraying the Houthis as aggressors and Saudi Arabia as the aggrieved party, with some emotionally charged language like 'testing a red line.' While the facts are presented neutrally, the narrative subtly frames the conflict in a way that may favor Saudi interests.
The NationalStranački povezanProgresivnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 65prije 10 dana Jemen STC kaže porast Houthi krijumčarenje postaviti podlogu za Crveno more blokadeU članku se raspravlja o situaciji u južnom Jemenu nakon preuzimanja sigurnosnih operacija od Južnog prijelaznog vijeća (STC) od strane Nacionalnog štita koji je usklađen sa Saudijskom Arabijom.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se Saudijska intervencija prikazuje kao "strateška greška" koja je osnažila Hutije i druge terorističke skupine, koristeći jezik koji podrazumijeva odgovornost za trenutnu dinamiku sukoba.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article provides specific claims from Amr Al Bidh of the Southern Transitional Council regarding the failure of National Shield Forces to address Houthi smuggling. It references the timeline of events and the involvement of AQAP and Al Shabab. However, it lacks independent corroboration of these
Zašto objektivnost (65): The article presents the perspective of the Southern Transitional Council and criticizes Saudi intervention. It uses phrases like 'strategic mistake' and 'empowered the Houthis,' which may indicate a bias against Saudi policy.
Gulf NewsStranački povezan🔒SredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 65prije 15 danaČlanak izvješćuje o obnovljenim napetostima u jemenskom sukobu, s Houthi pobunjenicima koji prijete da će blokirati moreuz Bab Al-Mandab, kritičan pomorski prolaz kroz Crveno more. Ovaj razvoj je izazvao zabrinutost zbog potencijalnih poremećaja globalnih opskrbe naftom, jer moreuz služi kao glavna ruta za isporuke nafte s Bliskog istoka u Europu i Aziju. Situacija naglašava stalnu nestabilnost u regiji i strateški značaj područja za međunarodnu trgovinu. Članak napominje da ova eskalacija označava ponovno oživljavanje neprijateljstava između Houthija i koalicijskih snaga pod vodstvom Saudijske Arabije, koje su uključene u sukob od 2015. godine.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja situaciju kao geopolitičko pitanje bez da otvoreno favorizira bilo koju stranu, fokusira se na implikacije prijetnje Huthija bez da zauzme jasan stav o samom sukobu, održavajući uravnotežen pristup naglašavajući kako regionalne tako i međunarodne rizike.
Zašto činjenice (75): The article reports on the Houthis threatening a Bab Al-Mandab blockade, which aligns with cross-source consensus that the Yemen war has escalated. However, the phrasing 'twin oil chokepoints?' suggests a speculative framing rather than confirmed facts. No primary source is available to verify the s
Zašto objektivnost (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'reignites' and implies a significant escalation without providing balanced perspectives from all parties involved. The focus on the Houthis' actions may reflect a bias toward certain narratives.
Gulf NewsStranački povezan🔒SredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 65prije 15 dana Rat u Jemenu ponovno se rasplamsava jer Huti prijete blokadom Baba Al-MandabaČlanak izvješćuje o obnovljenim napetostima u jemenskom sukobu, s Houthi pobunjenicima koji prijete da će blokirati moreuz Bab Al-Mandab, ključni pomorski prolaz kroz Crveno more. Ovaj razvoj je izazvao zabrinutost zbog potencijalnih poremećaja globalnih opskrbe naftom, jer moreuz služi kao glavna ruta za isporuke nafte s Bliskog istoka u Europu i Aziju. Situacija naglašava stalnu nestabilnost u regiji i strateški značaj područja za međunarodnu trgovinu. Članak napominje da ova eskalacija označava ponovno oživljavanje neprijateljstava između Houthija i koalicijskih snaga pod vodstvom Saudijske Arabije, koje su uključene u sukob od 2015. godine.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja situaciju kao geopolitičko pitanje bez da otvoreno favorizira bilo koju stranu, fokusira se na implikacije prijetnje Huthija bez da zauzme jasan stav o samom sukobu, održavajući uravnotežen pristup naglašavajući kako regionalne tako i međunarodne rizike.
Zašto činjenice (75): This is a duplicate of Article 0, so the factuality score remains similar. It repeats the claim about the Houthis threatening a Bab Al-Mandab blockade without new information or verification.
Zašto objektivnost (65): As a duplicate of Article 0, it shares the same issues regarding emotional language and lack of balance. It does not add new perspective or challenge the narrative presented.
The NationalStranački povezanSredinaČinjenice 70Objektivnost 75prije 11 dana Saudijska Arabija odbacuje prijetnju "morske embarge" Houthija i upozorava na eskalaciju Crvenog moraSaudijska Arabija odbacila je objavu grupe Hutija o "morski embargo", nazvavši ga lažnim i optuživši pokret koji podržava Iran za širenje dezinformacija. Hutiji su proglasili embargo 21. srpnja 2026., ali nisu precizirali kako ili gdje će se provoditi. Saudijske vlasti naglasile su svoje dugogodišnje napore da pomognu Jemenu kroz humanitarnu pomoć, razvojne projekte i opskrbu gorivom, istodobno kritizirajući Hutije zbog blokiranja inicijativa poput jordanskih predloženih letova za Sanu. Zatvaranje moreuza Bab Al Mandeb od strane Hutija moglo bi značajno utjecati na izvoz saudijske nafte i regionalnu trgovinu. Ujedinjeni narodi upozorili su na potencijalnu regionalnu eskalaciju i pozvali na deeskalaciju kroz dijalog.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljene pozicije Saudijske Arabije i grupe Hutija, bez da se otvoreno favorizira bilo koja strana.
Zašto činjenice (70): Article repeats content from earlier reports on Houthi smuggling and its implications for the Red Sea. While it provides some context, it lacks new information and does not offer independent verification of the claims made.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article maintains a neutral tone, discussing the impact of smuggling on the region without taking sides. However, it emphasizes the role of Saudi intervention, which could be interpreted as subtle bias.
The NationalStranački povezanProgresivnoČinjenice 60Objektivnost 65prije 10 dana Jemen STC kaže porast Houthi krijumčarenje postaviti podlogu za Crveno more blokadeU članku se navodi da Južno prelazno vijeće (STC), grupa koja predstavlja južni Jemen, tvrdi da Nacionalni štitovi, koji su usklađeni sa Saudijskom Arabijom, nisu uspjeli spriječiti krijumčarske aktivnosti Houthija, što bi potencijalno dovelo do blokade Crvenog mora.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se izražava saudijsko vojno prisustvo u Jemenu kao "strateška greška" koja je osnažila Huseje, koristeći snažan jezik poput "osnažene" i "terorističke skupine".
Zašto činjenice (60): Article is a brief summary of multiple unrelated events, including tanker turns, Trump's Lebanon policy, and chickenpox in Gaza. It lacks depth and fails to provide sufficient context or verification for most claims.
Zašto objektivnost (65): The tone is generally neutral, but the inclusion of diverse and often unrelated topics can lead to a lack of focus. The article may appear less objective due to its broad and superficial coverage.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
AE
