ON
← Natrag na feed
Vlada je odlučila da javna korist energije prevladava nad očuvanjem prirode u slučaju HE Mokrice
Slovenia🏛️ PolitikaBliže konzervativnom

Vlada je odlučila da javna korist energije prevladava nad očuvanjem prirode u slučaju HE Mokrice

U skladu s tim, Komisija je zaključila da je državna potpora u smislu članka 107. stavka 1. Ova je odluka donesena tijekom obnovljenog administrativnog postupka i uvjetovana je provedbom opsežnih mjera ublažavanja i kompenzacijskih mjera za zaštitu staništa, vrsta riba i prolaza vodenih organizama. Ministarstvo okoliša i prostornog planiranja očekuje izdavanje konačne građevinske dozvole u prvoj polovici 2027., pod pretpostavkom da se neće pojaviti daljnji pravni izazovi. Projektni projektant HESS pozdravio je odluku kao značajan korak prema dovršetku lanca pet hidroelektrana na donjoj rijeci Save. Vlada je naglasila da sljedeća faza uključuje sveobuhvatan proces izdavanja građevinskih dozvola u kojem će se preispitati preostale procjene utjecaja na okoliš i uvjeti građevinskih zakona.

The Slovenian government has issued a decision declaring that the public interest in energy production outweighs the public interest in nature conservation for the planned Mokrice hydropower plant. This ruling was adopted during a written session of the cabinet and serves as a critical legal prerequisite within the integrated procedure for obtaining a building permit. It marks the third attempt by the government to secure this specific legal status after previous decisions were overturned by courts. The move allows the project to proceed despite its potential adverse impacts on protected areas, specifically the lower reaches of the Sava and Krka rivers. The legal mechanism known as the prevalence of public interest is an exceptional provision under European Union legislation. It permits the implementation of projects that have harmful effects on protected sites, such as Natura 2000 areas, only under strict conditions. The state must demonstrate that there are no suitable alternatives to the project, that imperative reasons of overriding public interest exist, and that compensatory measures will be implemented to preserve the integrity of the affected habitats. In this instance, the government determined that these conditions are met for the generation of electricity from renewable sources. The decision is strictly conditional upon the execution of extensive mitigation and compensation measures designed to protect nature before, during, and after the construction phase. These measures include the establishment and maintenance of appropriate habitats, the installation of passages for aquatic organisms, the protection of fish species and spawning grounds, and continuous environmental monitoring. An additional compensatory measure has been designated for a specific Natura 2000 site. The ruling further mandates systematic monitoring to verify the effectiveness of these actions, requiring the use of the latest methods and practices in determining how this oversight is conducted. The Mokrice facility is designed to be the final unit in a chain of five hydropower plants along the lower Sava river. The other four units are located at Bostanj, Blanca, Krsko, and Brezice, with the Brezice plant commencing operations in 2017. Unlike the previously constructed facilities, Mokrice is planned downstream of the point where the Krka River flows into the Sava. This location means the reservoir would extend into the outflow section of the Krka, potentially affecting both waterways. The project is also situated near the confluence of the Sotla River, which joins the Sava immediately downstream of the planned Mokrice area, raising concerns about impacts on local habitats. The path to this current decision has been marked by years of administrative procedures and litigation. A previous government led by Janez Jansa adopted a similar declaration in 2022, just before the end of its mandate, effectively giving the green light for construction. However, the Administrative Court ruled in May 2023 in favor of the Society for the Study of Fish in Slovenia, which had filed a lawsuit against the decision. The court found that the state had misapplied material law by deciding on the acceptability of certain environmental impacts that were not subject to that specific procedure. The court also identified multiple violations of procedural rules. Following this ruling, the case was returned for new consideration. The current government under Prime Minister Robert Golob announced in February of this year that it would make a new attempt to determine the prevalence of public interest for the project. Environmental Minister Polona Rifelj stated last week that her ministry would require several months to issue the actual building permit following the adoption of the prevalence decision. She estimated that the permit could be granted in the first half of 2027. The company responsible for the investment, Hydroelectric Plants on the Lower Sava, welcomed the government's decision. In a statement, the firm described the outcome as the result of a thorough and technically demanding process involving domestic and foreign experts, state institutions, the interested public, and local communities. They noted that cross-border consultation had also been carried out. Andrej Vizjak, director of Gen Energija, the majority owner of the investor entity, expressed confidence that the government’s decision is prepared with sufficient quality to withstand judicial scrutiny. He acknowledged that he expects another appeal from the Society for the Study of Fish in Slovenia but believes the current ruling addresses previous legal deficiencies. If no further court proceedings delay the process, the company estimates that construction of the Mokrice hydropower plant could begin in 2027. Originally, the completion of this run-of-river plant was scheduled for 2018, but delays occurred due to complications regarding spatial planning. International relations have also played a role in the project's trajectory. The Croatian Ministry of Environmental Protection and Green Transition informed the Slovenian Ministry of Environment that it does not agree with the project. The proposed location for Mokrice is approximately 450 meters from the border with Croatia. Authorities in Zagreb argue that the construction would worsen the already negative impact of existing Slovenian hydropower plants on surface and groundwater conditions in Croatia. Despite this diplomatic objection, the Slovenian government proceeded with its internal legal determination. The immediate next step in the administrative process is the acquisition of a legally binding building permit. The integrated permitting procedure will continue to address remaining issues related to environmental impact assessments and compliance with construction laws. Until this permit is finalized and becomes final, the project remains in a preparatory stage. The focus now shifts to whether the detailed mitigation plans outlined in the government's decision will satisfy regulatory requirements and withstand potential challenges in the courts.

Kako je nastao ovaj izvještaj. Objektivne vijesti je ovaj izvještaj napisao iz 3 izvornih članaka uz pomoć umjetne inteligencije prema našoj metodologiji. Riječ je o našem vlastitom tekstu, a ne o kopiji pojedinog medija. Pročitajte našu metodologiju.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaUočili ste pogrešku? Prijavite je

3 izvještaja

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85
Hidroelektrana Mokrice: Vlada je donijela odluku o prednosti energije nad prirodom. -Što to znači?

Slovenija je objavila da je u skladu s člankom 107. stavkom 3. Taj pravni mehanizam omogućuje nastavak projekta unatoč štetnim učincima na zaštićena područja, posebno na donju rijeku Savu, rijeku Krku i njihovo slivno područje. Prva dva slična rješenja poništila su upravna suda nakon tužbi koje je podnijelo Društvo za proučavanje ribe u Sloveniji. Nova presuda zahtijeva opsežne mjere ublažavanja, uključujući obnovu staništa, objekte za prolazak riba i nadzor okoliša, kao uvjete za dobivanje građevinske dozvole. Projekt je usmjeren na poboljšanje kvalitete vode u vodama i vodovodima, kao i na poboljšanje kvalitete vode u vodama.

Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U naslovu se izričito navodi da vladina akcija daje prednost "enerziji nad prirodom" ("prevlado koristi energetike nad narovo"), koristeći terminologiju punu vrijednosti koja sugerira sukob u kojem industrijski interesi prevladavaju nad ekološkim očuvanjem. Dok članak pruža tehničke detalje i

Zašto činjenice (90): This article provides additional verified context regarding the legal history (previous court rulings stopping the first two attempts) and the specific ecological concerns (location downstream of the Krka river outflow). These details are consistent with public records of the dispute and add depth t

Zašto objektivnost (85): While largely objective, the inclusion of specific negative impacts ('škodljivo vplivala' - harmful impact) and the emphasis on the legal battles introduces a slightly more critical perspective than the purely administrative tone of Article 0. However, it remains within the bounds of journalistic an

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)Državni / javniSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 90
Vlada je odlučila da javna korist energije prevladava nad očuvanjem prirode u slučaju HE Mokrice

U skladu s tim, Komisija je zaključila da je državna potpora u smislu članka 107. stavka 1. Ova je odluka donesena tijekom obnovljenog administrativnog postupka i uvjetovana je provedbom opsežnih mjera ublažavanja i kompenzacijskih mjera za zaštitu staništa, vrsta riba i prolaza vodenih organizama. Ministarstvo okoliša i prostornog planiranja očekuje izdavanje konačne građevinske dozvole u prvoj polovici 2027., pod pretpostavkom da se neće pojaviti daljnji pravni izazovi. Projektni projektant HESS pozdravio je odluku kao značajan korak prema dovršetku lanca pet hidroelektrana na donjoj rijeci Save. Vlada je naglasila da sljedeća faza uključuje sveobuhvatan proces izdavanja građevinskih dozvola u kojem će se preispitati preostale procjene utjecaja na okoliš i uvjeti građevinskih zakona.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja standardnu objavu vlade u vezi s regulatornom odlukom. Citira obrazloženje vlade i uključuje pozitivnu izjavu od strane dioničara privatnog sektora (HESS), ali ne uključuje kontraargumente nevladinih organizacija za zaštitu okoliša ili opozicijskih stranaka koje često

Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reflects the core facts of the government decision as reported by the official press agency (STA) and the broadcaster itself. It correctly identifies the 'prevailance' ruling, the conditions attached (mitigation measures), and the timeline for the building permit. The text app

Zašto objektivnost (90): The tone is neutral and informative. It presents the government's statement directly without adding editorial commentary or emotional adjectives. It balances the announcement of the energy project with the mention of environmental protection conditions.

Delo logoDeloNeovisan🔒KonzervativnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 90
HE Mokrice: Vlada je odlučila da proizvodnja električne energije bude važnija od očuvanja prirode

U skladu s tim, Komisija je zaključila da je u skladu s člankom 107. stavkom 3. Ova je odluka donesena u okviru integriranog postupka za izdavanje građevinske dozvole i zahtijeva opsežne mjere ublažavanja kako bi se zaštitili staništa, vrste riba i prolazi vodenih organizama prije, tijekom i nakon izgradnje. Ministrica okoliša Polona Rifelj najavila je predstojeći pregled prošlog tjedna i procjenjuje da će konačna građevinska dozvola biti odobrena u prvoj polovici sljedeće godine. Operator projekta, Hess, pozdravio je odluku kao značajan korak prema dovršetku lanca pet hidroelektrana donje rijeke Save, koja je odgođena jer su prvobitni planovi ciljali na dovršetak do 2018. godine. Izgradnja bi potencijalno mogla početi 2027. ako se ne pojave novi pravni izazovi.

Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U naslovu se izričito navodi da vlada daje prednost proizvodnji električne energije nad očuvanjem prirode, koristeći riječ "prevlada" (prevalence/priority) koja naglašava sukob između ekonomskih/energetskih interesa i zaštite okoliša. Dok tekst tijela predstavlja 'om

Zašto činjenice (85): Similar to Article 0, this piece relies heavily on the official government communication. It accurately reports the decision, the mitigation measures, and the procedural next steps. The text is also truncated at the end, but the visible portion contains no inaccuracies relative to the other sources.

Zašto objektivnost (90): The writing style is strictly neutral and reportorial. It mirrors the language used in the official press release, ensuring high objectivity by avoiding interpretive language or value judgments about the environmental trade-offs.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče