Viktorijanski laburisti su se uništili.

Victorian Labor faces a crisis of unprecedented proportions, marked by internal discord, public disillusionment, and a leadership transition that signals a dramatic break from past governance styles. Premier Ben Carroll, who assumed office earlier this month, explicitly distanced himself from his predecessors, Daniel Andrews and Jacinta Allan, stating, "I am not Daniel Andrews. I am not Jacinta Allan." This rare and blunt acknowledgment underscores the depth of disapproval among voters and within the party toward the former administration's legacy. The Andrews-Allan government, once lauded for its effectiveness in its initial term until 2018, has since become emblematic of mismanagement and overreach, according to analysts and current Labor figures. Carroll’s remarks come amid growing scrutiny of the previous government's policies, particularly its handling of economic issues and public engagement. While the Andrews-Allan administration initially enjoyed success through bold infrastructure investments and centralized decision-making, these strategies later became criticized for fostering a closed environment that excluded non-Labor stakeholders. This exclusionary approach reportedly contributed to a lack of public trust and exacerbated tensions with business interests and independent experts. The current situation in Victoria mirrors challenges faced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, whose recent budget handling has drawn comparisons to the contentious fiscal policies of the Andrews-Allan era. Business groups have raised concerns about Labor’s tax reforms, while Treasurer Jim Chalmers expressed frustration that his proposed productivity initiatives received minimal attention compared to criticisms surrounding capital gains tax adjustments. Albanese’s dismissive attitude towards dissenting voices, labeling critics as "barely coherent", has echoed similar rhetoric used by Andrews during the pandemic, further drawing parallels between the two administrations. Public discontent with the Andrews-Allan government has been compounded by its economic performance, which has attracted widespread criticism despite claims that its debt levels are comparable to other states on a per-capita basis. Jacinta Allan, in her resignation statement, highlighted the failure of the business community to recognize the benefits of large-scale infrastructure spending, a sentiment shared by many observers who believe the government did not effectively communicate its achievements. However, the broader narrative suggests that the Andrews-Allan administration's governance style ultimately alienated key constituencies and eroded public confidence. In contrast to the increasingly confrontational tactics employed by both Victorian and federal Labor leaders, Premiers Peter Malinauskas of South Australia and Chris Minns of New South Wales have adopted more inclusive approaches, avoiding the polarizing rhetoric that has characterized the Andrews-Allan period. These differences in leadership style reflect divergent strategies within the broader Labor movement, with some leaders opting for open dialogue and collaboration, while others continue to prioritize centralized control and ideological consistency. Internal dynamics within the federal Labor party have also revealed fractures, with reports indicating that Albanese’s leadership is perceived as insular by some members. A senior Labor insider recounted an instance where a minister was advised to resolve policy disputes outside of cabinet meetings, suggesting a preference for maintaining unity over open debate. Such practices risk stifling innovation and critical evaluation within the party, potentially limiting its ability to adapt to evolving political landscapes. As the political landscape continues to shift, the lessons from the Andrews-Allan era remain pertinent for Albanese and his administration. The need for transparent communication, stakeholder inclusivity, and balanced governance becomes ever more crucial in navigating future challenges. With the upcoming elections approaching, the ability of Labor to address these issues will likely determine its trajectory in both Victoria and at the federal level.