Two U.S. service members were killed and one remains missing after Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks in Jordan on Friday, according to U.S. military officials. The attacks occurred amid escalating tensions between the United States and Iran, which have led to a series of retaliatory strikes and counterstrikes across the Middle East. The U.S. Central Command (Centcom) confirmed the deaths, stating that two service members were killed in action while defending against the Iranian attacks. A third service member is currently missing, though details about the location of the attack in Jordan have not been disclosed. Four U.S. service members were medically evacuated to Jordanian hospitals following the attacks but have since been discharged. Those with minor injuries have returned to duty. Centcom emphasized that it would not release additional information, including the identities of the deceased, until 24 hours after notifying the families of the victims. The U.S. death toll in the ongoing conflict has now reached 16, following the confirmation of the deaths of two soldiers in Jordan and the declaration of death for an American Navy pilot who had gone missing earlier in the month. Iranian state media reported that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed responsibility for destroying at least two U.S. fighter aircraft at Al-Azraq base in Jordan. However, Centcom has not confirmed these reports. Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of State issued a notice urging Americans in the region to monitor the situation closely due to the heightened risk of escalation. The advisory also urged Americans worldwide to exercise increased caution given the volatile security environment in the Middle East. The conflict escalated dramatically after a preliminary agreement between the United States and Iran, aimed at ending the war, collapsed within a month of its signing. Since the start of the conflict, which began on February 28 with U.S.-Israeli military actions against Iran, thousands have been killed across the region. Iranian state media cited the country's health ministry as reporting at least 50 fatalities and over 500 injuries from U.S. strikes since late June. The latest attacks have extended the conflict into a seventh consecutive night of U.S. airstrikes on Iran, with both sides accusing each other of targeting civilian infrastructure. U.S. military officials stated that the recent strikes targeted "military logistics infrastructure," including surveillance sites, underground weapons storage, and maritime capabilities. In contrast, Iranian state media reported damage to bridges and an electricity and desalination plant in the southern province of Jask, affecting approximately 10,000 people. Footage released by Centcom showed cruise missiles being launched from a Navy warship and fighter jets engaging targets, including a communications tower and a highway bridge. The U.S. has also reimposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports, halting crude oil shipments and redirecting five ships while disabling one. Iran's leadership has made clear its stance on the conflict, with the IRGC declaring that no oil or gas will leave the Strait of Hormuz until the U.S. ceases its attacks. This follows a series of retaliatory strikes by Iran, including attacks on U.S. allies in the Gulf, such as Jordan and Kuwait. The Gulf Cooperation Council has condemned Iran's targeting of civilian infrastructure, calling such actions "war crimes." Under international law, attacking civilian objects is prohibited unless they are directly supporting the enemy's war effort. Tensions have further intensified with U.S. President Donald Trump issuing threats to strike Iran's bridges and power plants if the country does not return to negotiations. His administration has also taken steps to bolster military presence in the region, with over 50,000 American service members deployed across the Middle East. The White House has maintained that diplomatic channels remain open, although the interim ceasefire agreement has effectively collapsed. Iran's deputy foreign minister stated that the country has suspended its commitments under the Memorandum of Understanding, emphasizing that it will focus solely on defending itself. The conflict shows no signs of abating, with both sides continuing to launch attacks and counterattacks. As the situation unfolds, the international community watches closely, concerned about the potential for further escalation and the impact on global energy markets and regional stability.
7 izvještaja
BBC News (World)Državni / javniSredinaČinjenice 95Objektivnost 90prije 14 danaDvojica američkih vojnika poginula su, a još jedan je nestao nakon napada iranskih balističkih projektila i bespilotnih letjelica u Jordanu, prema američkim vojnim dužnosnicima. Napadi su se dogodili u petak, a jordanska vojska presrela je 10 iranskih projektila bez izvješćivanja o šteti. Broj američkih žrtava u tekućem sukobu porastao je na 16, uključujući američkog mornaričkog pilota koji je proglašen mrtvim ovaj tjedan.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljeni činjenični izvještaji iz više izvora, uključujući američke vojne dužnosnike i iranske državne medije, bez otvorene naklonosti bilo kojoj strani.
Zašto činjenice (95): The article provides precise details about the casualties and the nature of the Iranian attacks in Jordan. It cites official statements from US Central Command and avoids making unverified claims. The information is consistent with other reports and shows high accuracy.
Zašto objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without editorializing. It respects the privacy of the victims by withholding personal details and quotes official statements objectively.
Middle East EyeNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85prije 13 danaIranski mediji su 19. srpnja 2026. objavili snimke koji pokazuju štetu na civilnoj infrastrukturi, uključujući mostove, u južnom Iranu nakon niza američkih zračnih napada.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja uravnotežen prikaz uzajamnog ciljanja civilne infrastrukture od strane SAD-a i Irana.
Zašto činjenice (90): The article provides detailed, verified information from military officials about the casualties and the US response. It includes specifics about the number of troops killed, the status of the missing personnel, and the official statements from Centcom, making it highly factual.
Zašto objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without overtly taking sides. It includes both US and Iranian perspectives when relevant, maintaining a balanced approach.
Daily MirrorNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prije 14 danaIranski državni mediji tvrde da je došlo do oštećenja infrastrukture u južnom Iranu, što je ostavilo tisuće ljudi bez vode, iako je američka središnja komanda osporila te tvrdnje. Sukob, koji je počeo prije više od četiri mjeseca, nastavlja se s odmazdom Irana lansiranjem raketa i bespilotnih letjelica, dok regionalni saveznici poput Kuvajta i Jordana izvještavaju o presretanju iranskih projektila. Iransko ministarstvo zdravlja izvijestilo je o najmanje 50 žrtava od sredine lipnja, a zemlja je suspendirala svoje obveze prema nedavnom sporazumu o prekidu vatre s SAD-om.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se američki postupci opisuju kao "kriminalni" i naglašava se iranski prkos, koristeći snažan jezik kako bi se SAD prikazao kao agresor.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reports Iran's suspension of the MoU and includes direct quotes from Iranian officials. It provides context about the agreement and its terms, aligning with the cross-source consensus on the breakdown of negotiations.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article presents the Iranian perspective without significant challenge, which could be seen as one-sided. However, it does include the official statement from Iran's foreign minister, offering some balance.
BBC News (World)Državni / javniSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 70prije 15 dana Eksplozije u Iranu dok SAD pokreće novi val napadaSAD je šest uzastopnih noćnih zračnih napada na Iran, ciljajući područja u blizini Ormuškog moreuza, koja je ključna za globalni tranzit nafte. Napadi imaju za cilj smanjenje iranskih vojnih sposobnosti, prema američkoj središnjoj komandi. Iranski državni mediji izvijestili su o raketnim napadima u blizini Kešma, Bandar Abbasa i Bušera, gdje se nalazi nuklearna elektrana.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja informacije iz američke i iranske perspektive, uključujući izjave američkih dužnosnika i iranskih državnih medija.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article reports the US strikes and Trump's policy changes, including the 20% fee on shipping, based on official statements. These claims align with cross-source reporting and are supported by direct quotes.
Zašto objektivnost (70): The article uses slightly emotive language around the toll of the strikes but remains largely objective. It presents the US actions without overtly criticizing or praising them.
Middle East EyeNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 60prije 18 dana Američki napadi na Iran treću noć ubijaju tri osobe.Američki vojni napadi ciljali su na Iran treću uzastopnu noć, što je rezultiralo najmanje tri žrtve. SAD je objavio snimke udara i najavio planove da nametne 20% naknadu na brodove kroz Hormuški moreuz, tvrdeći da će vodeni put ostati otvoren "sa ili bez Irana". Predsjednik Trump također je upozorio na potencijalnu akciju protiv iranskog navodnog nuklearnog mjesta, "Pickaxe Mountain", smještenog u blizini Natanza. Iranska državna televizija izvijestila je o eksplozijama u blizini Bandar Abbas, dok je iranski parlamentarni odbor predstavio zakonodavstvo za osiguranje Hormuškog moreuza. Bahrein je optužio Iran za provođenje raketnih i bespilotnih napada, navodeći civilne i imovinske štete.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se stavljaju akcije SAD-a kao opravdane i nužne, naglašavajući Trumpov agresivni stav i nametanje pristojbi iranskim brodovima.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article covers the incident involving the Indian seafarer and the UAE defense ministry's report, which aligns with the primary source document's discussion of attacks on shipping lanes. It provides relevant context about the broader conflict affecting regional waters.
Zašto objektivnost (60): The article frames the incident as a consequence of the larger conflict, focusing on the impact on international shipping. It lacks balance by not exploring diplomatic efforts or alternative viewpoints.
Middle East EyeNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 60prije 18 dana Indija pozvala zamjenika iranskog veleposlanika zbog ubojstva građanina u Hormuškom moreuzuIndija je 14. srpnja 2026. pozvala zamjenika iranskog veleposlanika nakon ubojstva indijskog mornara u Hormuškom moreuzu.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja činjenične događaje u vezi s diplomatskim akcijama i vojnim incidentima bez da otvoreno favorizira bilo koji određeni politički stav.
Zašto činjenice (75): The article reports the IRGC's claim of attacking a US command center in Syria, which matches the primary source document's description of retaliatory strikes. However, it does not clarify the verification status or provide full context about the broader conflict.
Zašto objektivnost (60): The article presents the IRGC's claim without independent verification, suggesting a pro-Iranian stance. It lacks neutrality in reporting the attack and its implications.
Daily MirrorNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 60Objektivnost 40prije 13 dana Donald Trump 'rizikuje totalni rat' na Bliskom istoku američkim zračnim napadima na IranU članku se navodi da su Sjedinjene Države izvele zračne napade na Iran kao odgovor na ubojstvo američkih vojnika u Jordanu. Napadi su bili usmjereni na iransku Revolucionarnu gardu i imali su za cilj ometati njene vojne sposobnosti u Hormuškom moreuzu. Iran je uzvratio lansiranjem projektila na Jordan i prijetnjom daljnjim akcijama. Sukob je eskalirao napetosti na Bliskom istoku, a regionalni saveznici poput Kuvajta, Jordana i Bahreina aktivirali su svoju obranu. U članku se ističe stalni neprijateljstva između SAD-a i Irana, napominjući da je Iran preusmjerio svoj fokus na napad na savezničke zemlje SAD-a, a ne na Izrael. Situacija je izazvala zabrinutost zbog potencijalnih širih regionalnih sukoba.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se američke akcije opisuju kao provokativne i eskalacijske, naglašavajući rizik od "totalnog rata" i prikazujući iransku odmazdu kao opravdanu.
Zašto činjenice (60): The article contains some inaccuracies and speculative elements. It mentions US airstrikes on Iran and references a non-existent '14-point memorandum of understanding.' These claims are not corroborated by other sources. The article also conflates events and attributes statements to individuals with
Zašto objektivnost (40): The article exhibits strong bias, using emotionally charged language such as 'risking all-out war' and quoting Hegseth in a way that frames the situation as a heroic response. It also criticizes Trump's stance on Netanyahu, showing a clear ideological slant.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
United Kingdom
