'Neki od poslodavaca skraćuju ljestve krajnjoj desnici': Sophie Binet opominje poslovne vođe

Sophie Binet, general secretary of the French总工会 (CGT), accused part of the business community of enabling far-right normalization through financial interests during the first presidential debate organized by the Medef, a major employers' association. The remarks came after the debate, which took place earlier this week, and reflect growing concerns among labor leaders about the political trajectory of the National Rally (RN), led by Marine Le Pen. The debate, held at the Medef's summer university, was attended by several presidential candidates. According to Binet, the focus of the discussion was misplaced, with candidates concentrating more on Jean-Luc Mélenchon rather than addressing the potential threat posed by the RN. She criticized the lack of urgency shown by the participants, arguing that the risk of the far right gaining power through elections has never been greater. “We have the impression of being in France in 1938, with immense inertia,” she stated, drawing a historical parallel to highlight the current political climate. Binet emphasized that the CGT’s stance is clear: the extreme right poses an existential threat to workers' rights and social progress. She argued that the business community should not be evaluating political candidates solely based on their economic policies but must consider their broader ideological positions. This includes views on the constitution, immigration, gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, judicial independence, and environmental policy. “The only criterion for evaluation by the business community is financial interest,” she said, condemning those whose priorities are driven purely by profit. The debate, hosted by the Medef, aimed to bring together presidential hopefuls to discuss economic issues facing France. However, according to Binet, the event failed to address the critical issue of the RN's rise in popularity and its potential impact on French democracy. Instead, the focus remained on economic proposals, neglecting the broader implications of allowing far-right rhetoric to gain legitimacy. The Medef, known for representing corporate interests, has long been a platform for discussions on economic policy and business strategy. Its summer university typically brings together business leaders, politicians, and economists to explore key challenges facing the economy. However, this year's event drew criticism from labor unions who felt that the agenda did not adequately address the risks associated with the RN's growing influence. Binet’s comments come amid heightened tensions between labor organizations and business groups over the direction of national politics. The CGT has consistently opposed the RN, viewing its policies as fundamentally incompatible with the principles of solidarity and collective action that underpin trade unionism. The accusation that parts of the business community are indirectly supporting the far right by legitimizing its presence in political discourse has further strained relations between the two sectors. The debate highlighted a deeper divide within French society regarding how to respond to the rise of populist movements. While some argue that engaging with all political actors is necessary for democratic dialogue, others warn against giving undue credibility to parties that threaten core democratic values. The CGT’s position reflects a broader concern among left-wing and progressive groups about the erosion of civil liberties and social protections under far-right governance. As the presidential campaign progresses, the role of institutions like the Medef will remain under scrutiny. Whether they continue to prioritize economic interests over political stability or adapt their approach to address emerging threats remains uncertain. For now, the CGT continues to advocate for a unified front against the far right, emphasizing that the fight for workers' rights must include a defense of democratic norms and constitutional values.