The University National Autonomous of Mexico (UNAM) has announced it detected “substantial changes” in results from its online and in-person exams, including the use of mobile phones and identity fraud. The institution is conducting a new in-person test for selected applicants and those who scored above historical minimums. According to Eduardo Bárzana García, president of the Technical Committee established July 27 to review the online exam, the analysis compared results from 2021 to 2025 with those obtained in this year’s 2026 exam. Bárzana García noted that while percentile shifts were relatively minor, the median and higher percentiles showed significantly greater increases. He explained that approximately 3.5% of applicants achieved 100 or more correct answers during the period 2021–2025, whereas in 2026, this proportion rose to 16.3%. Similarly, the percentage of applicants scoring 110 or more correct answers increased from 0.9% to 5.5%, representing a sixfold increase. These findings prompted the need for a comprehensive technical review, as the shift to an online format combined with the use of artificial intelligence introduced both advantages and risks. The committee identified several prohibited behaviors, including the use of mobile phones, assistance from others, external support for answering questions, and suspected identity theft. An AI-based monitoring system and human verification were used to detect these actions. As a result, nearly 2% of the 158,727 applicants had their tests canceled. Some candidates had already undergone prior verification, which revealed scores lower than those recorded in the initial online exam. The university will administer a second in-person test to around 58,000 applicants, according to officials. This measure aims to address anomalies and ensure fairness in the admissions process. The decision follows concerns raised by the Technical Committee regarding discrepancies in exam outcomes. While some applicants were already disqualified due to previous checks, the additional in-person assessment provides another opportunity for those who may have been unfairly affected. President Claudia Sheinbaum has expressed confidence in the integrity of the examination process, dismissing suggestions of malicious intent behind the online test. She emphasized her commitment to honesty and certainty in the evaluation of candidates. Her stance aligns with broader efforts to maintain transparency and accountability in academic assessments, particularly amid growing concerns over digital testing vulnerabilities. The use of AI in monitoring online exams has become increasingly common as institutions seek to prevent cheating. However, such measures are not without controversy. Critics argue that automated systems can sometimes fail to catch all instances of misconduct, especially when sophisticated methods are employed. In contrast, in-person exams offer a more direct means of supervision, though they come with logistical challenges and costs. The UNAM’s response reflects a balancing act between technological innovation and traditional oversight. By introducing a second round of testing, the university aims to reinforce its standards while addressing the complexities of remote examinations. The outcome of this process will likely influence future policies on digital assessments, particularly as more educational institutions adopt similar approaches. The university’s announcement underscores the ongoing debate surrounding the reliability of online exams. While technology offers convenience and scalability, it also introduces new avenues for potential abuse. The UNAM’s decision to implement additional safeguards highlights the importance of maintaining academic integrity in an evolving landscape. As the second in-person exam nears, attention will remain focused on how effectively the university can mitigate past issues and uphold its reputation for fair and rigorous admissions.
5 izvještaja
El UniversalNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75jučerNacionalni autonomni univerzitet u Meksiku (UNAM) najavio je novi osobni test za kandidate koji su prethodno odabrani ili su dobili više bodova od povijesnog minimuma. Tijekom ove objave, tehnički odbor otkrio je značajne promjene u rezultatima online ispita u usporedbi s prethodnim godinama kada je ispit proveden osobno.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja činjenične nalaze u vezi s pitanjima akademskog integriteta tijekom onlajn ispita na UNAM-u, fokusirajući se na statističke anomalije i otkriveno nepravilno ponašanje.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article reports on the UNAM's findings regarding changes in exam results between online and in-person formats, citing specific percentages and trends from 2021 to 2026. It provides data and quotes from officials, aligning with the cross-source consensus that there were significant anomalies dete
Zašto objektivnost (75): The tone is informative but leans toward presenting the issue as a problem requiring technical review, which may imply a certain level of concern. While it remains neutral in reporting facts, the emphasis on the need for a technical review suggests a slight editorial bias towards acknowledging the s
La JornadaNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 85prije 3 danaPredsjednica Claudia Sheinbaum odbacila je optužbe o "lošoj namjeri" u vezi s virtualnim ispitima koje provodi Nacionalni autonomni univerzitet Meksika (UNAM). U izjavi je naglasila svoju predanost poštenju i transparentnosti u akademskim procjenama.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja Sheinbauminu poziciju o akademskom integritetu bez otvorene podrške ili kritike određenih politika.
Zašto činjenice (80): This article presents the statement by Sheinbaum dismissing 'mal intent' and emphasizing honesty, which aligns with the broader narrative of the event. It lacks detailed data but reflects common positions among officials, maintaining consistency with other sources.
Zašto objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on Sheinbaum’s statements without introducing personal opinions or emotional language. It presents the position of a high-level official without taking sides or adding subjective commentary.
La JornadaNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 75Objektivnost 70prije 7 dana Navodne prijevare dovode u pitanje legitimnost UNAM-ovog digitalnog prijemnog ispita: stručnjakU članku se navodi da je stručnjak izrazio zabrinutost u vezi s legitimnošću digitalnog prijemnog ispita UNAM-a (Nacionalni autonomni univerzitet u Meksiku), sugerišući potencijalne zamke ili nedostatke u dizajnu testa.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): Svrha ispitivanja je da se ispita provede u skladu s nacionalnim standardima obrazovanja, a ne u skladu s međunarodnim standardima obrazovanja, koji se nalaze u nacionalnim standardima obrazovanja.
Zašto činjenice (75): The article includes quotes from an academic expert who discusses concerns about the legitimacy of the exam and mentions specific examples like the increase in scores in Medicine. These details align with the general consensus but lack direct evidence or official confirmation, reducing its factualit
Zašto objektivnost (70): The language used by the expert carries some criticism and skepticism, which introduces a degree of subjectivity. The article frames the issue as a credibility crisis, suggesting a potential bias toward highlighting the negative implications of the exam results.
ReformaNeovisanSredinaprije 11 hČlanak izvještava da će Nacionalni autonomni univerzitet u Meksiku (UNAM) provesti još jedan ispit zbog anomalija otkrivenih u prethodnim procjenama.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljene informacije o institucionalnoj odluci o akademskim evaluacijama bez otvorene podrške ili kritike bilo kojeg političkog stajališta.
La JornadaNeovisanSredinajučer Ispit za prisustvo UNAM-a bit će za oko 58 tisuća kandidata: ArámburoNacionalni autonomni univerzitet u Meksiku (UNAM) provest će obavezni osobni ispit za otprilike 58.000 podnositelja zahtjeva, prema Arámburu. Ova mjera vjerojatno ima za cilj osigurati integritet procesa prijema provjeravanjem identiteta kandidata i sprečavanjem akademskih prijevara.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak izvješćuje o standardnom administrativnom postupku koji provodi javna institucija, bez očiglednog ideološkog uokvirenja ili pristranog jezika.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
MX
