Main state prosecutor Ivan Turudić has stated that he will question the relevant authorities regarding why a specific concession was granted in Rijeka. Speaking during an appearance on HRT's Dnevnik program, Turudić noted that this was the sole among 15 concessions issued by the state, specifically the government, in 2015, with the others being issued by local municipalities. He emphasized that his office would conduct inspections to determine whether there were any legal violations or responsibilities associated with the decision, and he promised to ask the appropriate bodies why the choice was made. Turudić clarified that he had not spoken directly with Mostar’s parliamentary representative Marin Miletic, who had previously cut through a fence to allow public access to the beach near the Rijeka Hilton Hotel. When asked about Miletic’s claim that he had received confirmation of investigations against the company Costabella via the top of the State Prosecutor’s Office (DORH), Turudić denied having discussed the matter outside of formal sessions of parliament. In discussing the confirmed indictment against Ivo Todorić in the Agrokor case, Turudić highlighted that numerous “false prophets” had claimed the process would take 20 years or more. He noted that six individuals had been indicted, four of whom had reached settlements and admitted guilt, resulting in legally binding convictions. The remaining two accused, Todorić and a former health inspector named Discordia, are still under investigation. Turudić mentioned that Discordia had been temporarily unfit for duty due to health reasons, though further details on his condition remain pending. Turudić also recalled his involvement in the case as a judge at the High Court and as chairman of a committee that declared the initial falsification of evidence unlawful. Following that, a new expert from Austria was appointed, leading to the decision by the Zagreb County State Prosecutors' Office that suspicion should be directed toward six individuals rather than all 15 originally implicated. Regarding the ongoing situation involving former president of the Ski Association Vladimir Pavleks, who remains in Kazakhstan and opposes extradition over alleged embezzlement, Turudić indicated that legal means are still available but expressed hope that they will eventually be exhausted, allowing him to appear before Croatian judicial authorities. He added that even if Pavleks requested Kazakh citizenship, given the international arrest warrant, he could not be removed from Kazakhstan. When asked about potential new indictments, Turudić confirmed that further proceedings are underway. He detailed that an investigation into the ski association is ongoing, noting that over 120,000 documents were found on Pavleks’ laptop, a massive task compounded by the time required for annual vacations. Additionally, anonymous reports related to the football club Hajduk are being investigated, with proper documentation obtained and verified. Turudić addressed the issue of unauthorized camp construction by former national team player Dario Šimić, describing it as a “solid case.” He stated that evidence supports the existence of reasonable suspicion and that he is confident the case will conclude successfully, just as have other cases initiated by his office. All previous investigations either saw appeals rejected or confirmed charges. He concluded by emphasizing the effectiveness of his office’s work over the past two years.
1 izvještaja
N1 HrvatskaNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 68prije 5 h Turudić o koncesiji u Rijeci: Pitat ćemo nadležne zašto su donijeli baš tu odlukuGlavni državni odvjetnik Ivan Turudić komentirao je izvorne prijave o koncesiji za plažu ispred riječkog hotela Hilton, objašnjavajući da je to jedina od 15 koncesija izdano državom, Vlada 2015. godine, dok su ostale izdane županijama. Turudić napominje da će provesti inspekcije i pokušati utvrditi eventualne kršenja, te pitanje zašto je odluka upravo donesena u tom području.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljene informacije pravnog dužnosnika koji raspravlja o upravnim odlukama i tekućim pravnim postupcima bez da otvoreno favorizira bilo koju političku stranu.
Zašto činjenice (75): The article reports on statements made by Ivan Turudić regarding an investigation into a concession granted by the state in 2015. It mentions that this was the only concession out of 15 issued by the state, while others were issued by municipalities. The article also references ongoing inspections b
Zašto objektivnost (68): The tone is somewhat formal but leans toward presenting information from the perspective of the official involved (Turudić). There is some emphasis on the legal process and outcomes, which can be seen as slightly more detailed than a purely objective report. However, there is no overt bias or emotio
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj