Tono ministra Quiroza komplikira dogovore s opozicijom u trenutku prije glasanja o megariformi u Senatu

The political climate surrounding Chile's major tax reform has grown increasingly tense ahead of its critical vote in the Senate. Minister of Finance Jorge Quiroz’s recent comments have complicated efforts to reach consensus with opposition parties, even as the government pushes forward with its flagship legislative initiative under President Sebastián Piñera’s administration. The reform, which aims to overhaul Chile’s tax system, is set to enter a pivotal phase this week, likely by Wednesday at the latest, with a key vote in the Senate’s Finance Committee. From there, it will move toward full approval in the upper house. According to insiders from both the ruling coalition and the opposition, tensions have escalated due to multiple factors. These include disputes over amendments to the bill, constitutional charges against former finance minister Nicolás Grau, the draining of bank accounts of debtors linked to the state-run credit agency CAE, the disclosure of fiscal figures, controversies stemming from irregularities found by the Office of the Comptroller in the 2024 census, and a broader ideological battle framed around the reform’s cultural implications. However, the most contentious issue appears to be the sharp exchange between Quiroz and former president Gabriel Boric. In a weekend interview with Diario Financiero, Quiroz stated that for some reason, Boric does not seem to support the payment of debts, but he emphasized that such obligations must be met based on individuals' capacity. He added that current policies reflect this approach. His remarks immediately drew criticism from the opposition, with some calling them “disoriented,” lacking respect, and suggesting they reflected the rhetoric of an activist rather than a statesman. Others accused him of politicizing fiscal matters through ideology. In response, Subsecretary of the Interior Máximo Pavez attempted to temper the controversy during a television appearance. While defending Quiroz, Pavez clarified that the government did not aim to engage in conflict with Boric. Instead, he argued that the minister’s reaction was directed at positions perceived as attempting to create problems or harm, which the government deemed irresponsible. When pressed on whether Quiroz had named Boric directly, Pavez acknowledged it but reiterated that the goal was not confrontation, but rather fostering a discussion on the culture of order. Inside the presidential palace, officials believe that amid the heightened political tension, securing the passage of the amendment is the priority, regardless of the breadth of support. This sentiment was echoed by President Piñera during his pre-Country Accounts press conference on June 1, where he admitted while he would prefer a stronger majority, he insisted the proposal could still pass with just one vote. Support for Quiroz comes from within the Senate’s Finance Committee, led by Senator Javier Macaya of the UDI party. Macaya expressed confidence in the upcoming process and emphasized the importance of opening dialogue with all sectors. He defended Quiroz’s reference to a “cultural battle,” arguing it aimed to steer Chile away from years of economic stagnation, including periods when some suggested that growth was undesirable. According to Macaya, this cultural shift involves recalling the past achievements that once earned admiration, particularly from the opposition, which had previously been a driving force behind the country’s progress. Macaya encouraged the opposition to contribute their ideas actively, stating he was open to any proposals that could help restore growth, investment, and employment in Chile. He stressed the need for serious discussions on how to revive economic expansion and generate more opportunities for families. Within the ruling coalition, internal assessments suggest that despite the current friction, the focus remains firmly on passing the reform. With the Senate vote approaching, the government is likely to continue pushing for support, even if it means navigating a narrow margin of approval. The outcome will depend heavily on whether opposition lawmakers can be swayed or if the government can secure enough backing from its allies to ensure the measure moves forward.