President Bola Tinubu has faced sharp criticism from former Vice President and presidential contender Atiku Abubakar, who accused the administration of prioritizing political posturing over addressing Nigeria's critical socio-economic and security crises. In a pointed rebuke, Atiku lambasted Tinubu for his recent remarks suggesting readiness to “wrestle his opponents to the finish,” calling the comments emblematic of a leader overwhelmed by administrative shortcomings. Atiku, speaking through his senior special assistant, Phrank Shaibu, described Tinubu as “a drowning man” whose attempts to deflect public discontent through aggressive rhetoric only underscored the administration’s failure to meet basic citizen needs. The critique came amid Tinubu’s response to a call by the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria for credible, transparent, and peaceful elections. Atiku argued that such an occasion demanded reassurance and statesmanship, not combative language. He emphasized that the president’s remarks revealed an aloofness that contradicted the humility expected of a leader engaging with one of the nation’s most revered institutions. Atiku urged Tinubu to redirect his focus toward alleviating the suffering of ordinary citizens, particularly those facing food shortages, unemployment, and insecurity. He highlighted the dire conditions in rural areas, where farming communities have effectively become “graveyards” and highways serve as “hunting grounds” for criminals. The former vice president stressed that the president should engage with these real-world struggles rather than with political adversaries. “He should wrestle with the millions of Nigerians who now skip meals because food has become a luxury,” Atiku said, underscoring the urgency of economic reform and social welfare programs. He further warned that governments with poor records often resort to political theatrics to mask their inadequacies. Atiku noted that Nigerians are increasingly demanding tangible outcomes from leaders, not just empty promises or threats. “Empty slogans cannot fill empty stomachs. Boastful declarations cannot lower food prices. Threats against political opponents cannot restore the value of the naira,” he remarked, highlighting the disconnect between rhetorical gestures and practical solutions. Atiku also framed Tinubu’s greatest challenge not as external opposition but as the cumulative impact of his administration’s policies. He pointed to the growing number of unpaid workers, struggling businesses, and unemployed graduates as direct consequences of mismanagement. “Every hungry family is a living testimony to the consequences of his administration’s choices,” he said, implying that Tinubu’s leadership has consistently fallen short of expectations. The criticism comes amidst broader tensions within Nigerian politics, including accusations that Tinubu’s administration is leveraging controversial comparisons to justify its actions. Earlier, Atiku had criticized the presidency for invoking China’s legal framework to defend Tinubu, arguing that the comparison inadvertently drew more attention to past allegations against the president. This included references to a 1993 civil forfeiture case linked to narcotics trafficking, which Atiku’s lobbying group had previously petitioned U.S. officials about. Additionally, Atiku has challenged former President Olusegun Obasanjo, alleging that the latter is covertly supporting his relative in the upcoming 2027 election. This accusation followed Obasanjo’s claim that Atiku had provided financial assistance to a former speaker of the House, who later died. Atiku dismissed the allegations as politically motivated, questioning the timing of Obasanjo’s revelations and suggesting they were meant to tarnish his reputation. He urged Obasanjo to publicly endorse a candidate to ensure transparency, emphasizing that Nigerians deserve clarity rather than recycled accusations. These developments reflect the complex interplay of personal rivalries, political strategy, and public accountability in Nigeria’s evolving democratic landscape. As the 2027 election approaches, the discourse around leadership, integrity, and governance continues to intensify, shaping both the political narrative and the aspirations of the electorate.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
NG
