Američka vojska želi dominaciju umjetne inteligencije.

The U.S. Department of Defense has intensified efforts to secure artificial intelligence (A.I.) dominance amid growing concerns over China's rapid advancements in the field. According to multiple reports, internal disputes within the administration and external pressures from Beijing could hinder these ambitions. The situation highlights a strategic race for technological superiority that has become central to global power dynamics. In recent months, the Pentagon has accelerated investments in A.I.-driven defense systems, including autonomous weapons, predictive analytics, and cyber warfare capabilities. Officials have emphasized the need for a unified approach to harnessing A.I., yet bureaucratic infighting and conflicting priorities among agencies have created obstacles. Meanwhile, Chinese state-backed firms continue to make strides in areas such as quantum computing and neural networks, raising alarms in Washington. China's progress in A.I. has been bolstered by substantial government funding and a strategy that integrates civilian and military research. Beijing has positioned itself as a leader in developing ethical frameworks for A.I. deployment, contrasting with the more fragmented regulatory landscape in the United States. This divergence has led to calls for greater coordination within the U.S. government to prevent falling behind. The administration's response to A.I.'s national security implications has shown inconsistency. Some officials advocate for aggressive investment and regulation, while others push for caution, citing potential risks associated with uncontrolled A.I. development. These divisions have complicated policy formulation and slowed decision-making processes. At the same time, China's assertive posture in regions like the South China Sea and its increasing influence in global tech standards have added urgency to the U.S. position. Recent developments suggest that both countries are preparing for a prolonged contest in A.I. technology. The U.S. has initiated several initiatives aimed at fostering collaboration between academia, private industry, and the military. However, challenges remain in aligning interests across sectors and ensuring that innovations translate into practical applications on the battlefield. In contrast, China's centralized planning model allows for swift implementation of strategies, giving it an edge in certain domains. Within the White House, discussions around counterterrorism have also taken center stage. Dr. Sebastian Gorka, Deputy Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Counter Terrorism in the National Security Council, recently claimed that over 1,666 jihadists had been "permanently removed from the battlefield." His remarks were made during an interview on "The Alex Marlow Show," a program broadcast by the Salem Radio Network and hosted by Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow. Gorka's comments reflect the administration's focus on combating terrorism through both conventional and unconventional means, including leveraging advanced technologies. The intersection of A.I. and counterterrorism underscores the broader strategic goals of the U.S. military. As it seeks to maintain its technological edge, the administration faces mounting pressure to resolve internal conflicts and address the evolving threat posed by adversaries like China. With both nations investing heavily in A.I., the coming years will likely see increased competition, cooperation, and innovation in this critical domain.