Porezni obveznici mogli bi platiti milijune za žrtve zlostavljanja ako Kršćanska braća bankrotira, otkrivaju sudski dokumenti

Taxpayers may end up footing the bill for millions of dollars in compensation to survivors of historical sexual abuse if the Christian Brothers, a Catholic religious order, becomes insolvent, according to recently disclosed court documents. The order, long associated with widespread child abuse scandals, has informed the court it is financially unsustainable and unable to meet its obligations to survivors. The revelation comes amid growing concern over the potential burden on Australian taxpayers, who could be required to cover up to $65 million in outstanding claims against the Christian Brothers. This figure includes both existing and anticipated redress claims under the National Redress Scheme, a government program designed to provide compensation to survivors without requiring them to go to court. According to an actuarial report released this week, the Christian Brothers faces 340 current redress claims totaling approximately $25 million. However, the report also forecasts an additional 590 claims, valued at around $40 million, in future years. Combined, these figures amount to 930 claims worth $65 million. Under the terms of the redress scheme, the federal government acts as the “funder of last resort,” meaning it must step in to cover these costs if the institution is unable to pay. Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek expressed frustration with the situation, emphasizing that survivors deserve accountability from those responsible for their abuse. She criticized the Christian Brothers for not taking full responsibility for the harm caused by members of their order. “Funder of last resort arrangements which call on taxpayer funds should be just that, the absolute last resort,” she stated. The Christian Brothers is currently proposing a plan to liquidate its remaining 36 properties and distribute the proceeds among creditors, including survivors and the government. However, the revenue generated from these sales is unlikely to come close to meeting the full amount owed to survivors. Survivors and their legal representatives are particularly upset that the order has transferred valuable properties to a separate entity, the Trustees of Edmund Rice Education Australia, for minimal fees over the past decade. That entity is resisting efforts to sell the properties to fund survivor claims. Plibersek confirmed the government’s commitment to ensuring the integrity of the National Redress Scheme. “I want to assure victim-survivors that the Albanese Labor government will ensure the integrity of the National Redress Scheme is upheld, and applications naming Christian Brothers can continue to be lodged and will be determined in the usual way,” she said. The Department of Social Services is actively involved in the ongoing proceedings before the Supreme Court of New South Wales regarding the Christian Brothers' proposed financial restructuring. Further concerns were raised by revelations that the Christian Brothers has continued to support nine convicted child abusers within the order despite their criminal records. Two of the organization's remaining properties are being used to house individuals with severe histories of abuse, including one former member who sexually exploited orphans and another who remained in a teaching position for nearly three decades after authorities became aware of his misconduct. The court documents also indicate that another entity, the Brothers of the Christian Schools of Ireland, holds significant assets beyond the reach of survivors and other creditors. As of December 31, 2025, the entity had net assets of $57 million, which had since dropped to $47 million. The exact reasons for this decline remain unclear, but the implications for survivors seeking justice are profound. The situation highlights the complex interplay between institutional accountability, legal frameworks, and the role of public funding in addressing historical wrongs. With the Christian Brothers facing insolvency, the focus shifts increasingly toward the government’s ability to fulfill its role as the funder of last resort while protecting the rights of survivors and managing taxpayer resources responsibly.