ON
← Natrag na feed
Swapna, 5 drugih optuženih u slučaju Kerala's Wadakkanchery LIFE Mission
India🏛️ PolitikaSredinaprije 10 h

Swapna, 5 drugih optuženih u slučaju Kerala's Wadakkanchery LIFE Mission

Centralni istražni ured (CBI) podnio je preliminarni optužnički spis u slučaju korupcije u projektu Wadakkanchery LIFE Mission, nazivajući šest osoba i subjekata optuženih za financijske nepravilnosti. Slučaj uključuje optužbe za zlouporabu ₹ 21 crore u sredstvima namijenjenim za stanovanje žrtava poplava, s optužbama da je ₹ 4.5 crore odvojeno kao provizije i potplata, dok je ₹ 5 crore nezakonito zadržano kao dobit. Projekt, koji je prvobitno planiran za pružanje stanova za 203 obitelji, smanjen je na 140 jedinica zbog navodne korupcije. Ključne osobe uključuju Santhosh Eappen, njegovu tvrtku Sane Ventures i bivše zaposlenike konzulata UAE-a.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has submitted a preliminary chargesheet in the controversial Wadakkanchery LIFE Mission corruption case, naming six individuals as accused in the probe. The chargesheet was filed with the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Kerala earlier this month. Among those named are Swapna Suresh, Sandeep Nair, P.S. Sarith, and three other entities linked to the project. The chargesheet alleges large-scale financial irregularities during the execution of the housing project aimed at rehabilitating flood victims in 2018. The accused include Santhosh Eappen, managing partner of Unitac Builders, whose company Sane Ventures is also listed as an accused party. The LIFE Mission project itself is cited as the third accused, indicating the involvement of the initiative in the alleged misconduct. Additionally, former UAE Consulate employees Sandeep Nair, P.S. Sarith, and Swapna Suresh are named as the fourth, fifth, and sixth accused, respectively. Notably, M. Sivasankar, the Principal Secretary to former Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, and U.V. Jose, the former CEO of the LIFE Mission, were omitted from the preliminary chargesheet despite their potential connection to the case. The CBI is expected to file a supplementary chargesheet once further evidence is received from the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau. This follow-up action comes after the investigation revealed that the project, which was funded with ₹21 crore from the UAE Red Crescent, suffered significant mismanagement. The funds were intended for constructing apartment complexes and a healthcare facility, yet the chargesheet indicates that only approximately ₹10 crore was actually used for construction. According to the chargesheet, the accused allegedly conspired to divert ₹4.5 crore from the project as commissions and kickbacks. Santhosh Eappen is further accused of channeling another ₹5 crore as unlawful profit share, leading to a substantial inflation of the project's costs. These actions not only undermined the integrity of the project but also led to its eventual stalling, depriving flood-affected residents of the promised housing. The number of residential units was reduced from the original plan of 203 to just 140 due to these discrepancies. The case was initiated following a complaint by former Wadakkanchery MLA Anil Akkara, who alleged violations of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act and corruption. The CBI found that the project was awarded to firms controlled by Santhosh Eappen, bypassing standard government procurement procedures and allegedly ignoring the eligibility of established agencies such as the Habitat Technology Group. This procedural deviation raised serious concerns about transparency and accountability in the allocation of public resources. A separate investigation into the case is ongoing through the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, which is examining the matter independently. The case has become a major political issue for the first Pinarayi Vijayan government, highlighting the challenges faced in ensuring proper oversight of state-funded projects. The allegations against the accused have sparked discussions about the need for stricter regulatory frameworks and greater transparency in public works initiatives.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

1 izvještaja

The Hindu logoThe HinduNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 78Objektivnost 82prije 10 h
Swapna, 5 drugih optuženih u slučaju Kerala's Wadakkanchery LIFE Mission

Centralni istražni ured (CBI) podnio je preliminarni optužnički spis u slučaju korupcije u projektu Wadakkanchery LIFE Mission, nazivajući šest osoba i subjekata optuženih za financijske nepravilnosti. Slučaj uključuje optužbe za zlouporabu ₹ 21 crore u sredstvima namijenjenim za stanovanje žrtava poplava, s optužbama da je ₹ 4.5 crore odvojeno kao provizije i potplata, dok je ₹ 5 crore nezakonito zadržano kao dobit. Projekt, koji je prvobitno planiran za pružanje stanova za 203 obitelji, smanjen je na 140 jedinica zbog navodne korupcije. Ključne osobe uključuju Santhosh Eappen, njegovu tvrtku Sane Ventures i bivše zaposlenike konzulata UAE-a.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su prikazane činjenične informacije o slučaju korupcije u kojem su uključene političke ličnosti i vladini projekti, a da se ne favorizira neka određena politička ideologija.

Zašto činjenice (78): The article provides details about the CBI chargesheet in the Wadakkanchery LIFE Mission case, naming several individuals and entities involved. It references the funding sources, the complainant, and the legal framework under which the case was registered. While it does not provide a primary source

Zašto objektivnost (82): The article presents information in a neutral tone, focusing on facts such as the chargesheet, the accused parties, and the background of the case. It avoids taking sides or using emotionally charged language, maintaining a balanced approach to the reporting.

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče