Pretražite više od 500 slučajeva američkih građana koje su uhapsili imigracijski agenti.
ProPublica je prikupila podatke iz više od 500 slučajeva koji uključuju američke građane koje su zadržali savezni imigracijski agenti između 2025. i 2026. Izvještaj naglašava specifične incidente u više država u kojima su građani bili izloženi fizičkoj sili, dugotrajnom pritvoru ili pogrešnoj identitetu. Značajni primjeri uključuju biciklista u Long Beachu u Kaliforniji, koji je bio šokiran nakon sudara s ICE vozilom, i majku četvoro djece u Lafayetteu u Louisiani, koja je zadržana u pritvoru unatoč tome što je imala pravno zastupanje. U drugim slučajevima, kao što su oni u Evanstonu, Illinois, i Annapolis, Maryland, građani su prijavili ozljede ili produženo držanje bez trenutnog pristupa odvjetniku ili telefonima. Odgovori Federalnog odjela za domovinsku sigurnost (DHS) na ove incidente često su navodili nesaradnju s zakonitim zapovijedima ili potrebu za provjerom identiteta, dok su lokalna policija i neovisni svjedoci često proturječili službenim pričama o upotrebi sile ili početnoj osnovi za pritvor.
U.S. citizens are reporting increasing instances of detention, injury, and wrongful arrest by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, according to a review of more than 500 cases. These incidents span multiple states, including California, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Texas. The documented cases reveal a pattern of agents detaining individuals who possess valid citizenship, often resulting in physical harm, prolonged holding periods, or forced deportation. In Long Beach, California, a citizen riding a bicycle collided with an ICE vehicle. Video footage indicates the ICE vehicle was traveling the wrong way down a one-way street before swerving toward the cyclist. The citizen was tased, injured, and handcuffed following the collision. The Department of Homeland Affairs denied striking the individual and alleged the citizen smashed the vehicle’s side mirror, a claim not supported by available video evidence. In Ventura, California, a citizen documenting ICE operations was tackled and tased while already pinned to the ground. Another citizen was detained in Santa Maria, California, while separate detentions occurred in Newark, New Jersey, and Robinson Township, Pennsylvania. In Evanston, Illinois, an ICE team detained a citizen who matched the description of a person they were seeking. A responding Evanston police officer stated that one agent had blood on his hands and that the citizen was transported to a hospital. DHS officials asserted the man failed to comply with lawful commands and was held until he identified himself. In Annapolis, Maryland, a citizen leaving a coffee shop was handcuffed, denied a phone call, and held for nearly two hours. DHS explained that the agency moved the individual to another location for an interview because agitators had gathered nearby. In the Bronx, New York, Jeury Concepcion, a 19-year-old citizen, was walking past a barbershop when three masked agents tackled him, mistaking him for another individual. Concepcion stated that agents released him far from his home with a bleeding head, though one agent apologized. DHS described the incident as a temporary detention to safely conclude questioning. In New Orleans, Louisiana, an immigration lawyer who is a U.S. citizen was detained and shackled while attempting to film the detention of her clients. In Lafayette, Louisiana, a mother of four was detained at a local law enforcement checkpoint outside her apartment. She was transferred to ICE custody and booked into a detention facility before her attorney secured her release. Both ICE and the local law enforcement agency continue to dispute her citizenship status. In Asbury Park, New Jersey, a citizen was accused of assaulting an officer during the arrest of her husband. She was held for eight hours in Delaney Hall, an ICE detention facility, before being released without known charges. Video recordings show her nine-year-old daughter and toddler left crying alone in a vehicle while ICE agents stood guard until family members arrived. In Fredericksburg, Texas, a 25-year-old citizen from Denver, Colorado, was detained and subsequently deported after a traffic stop. Unable to provide identification or proof of citizenship at the time, he was held for several days without access to a phone or legal counsel before agreeing to leave the country. He was permitted to re-enter the United States in August using his Colorado birth certificate. Separate developments highlight tensions between judicial officials and immigration enforcement. The Wisconsin Supreme Court initiated an investigation into former Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, a process that could lead to her disbarment. The probe follows a complaint filed in July by the Center to Advance Security in America, which requested Dugan’s removal from the bar. In December, a jury convicted Dugan of felony obstruction after she diverted ICE officers in April 2025. Authorities stated Dugan became visibly angry and called the situation absurd when ICE appeared at the courthouse. She directed officers to the chief judge’s chambers and instructed Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who faced charges for battery, domestic abuse, and infliction of physical pain, to exit via a nonpublic jury door. ICE later apprehended Flores-Ruiz outside the building after a foot chase. Federal guidelines recommended a prison sentence of 15 to 21 months for Dugan, but she received a $5,000 fine and avoided incarceration. During her July sentencing, Dugan expressed hope to return to public service. Curtis Schube, director of research and policy at CASA, stated that Dugan’s actions rendered her unfit to serve as a judge or attorney. He noted that hindering ICE enforcement is comparable to obstructing police or FBI investigations. CASA argued that Dugan displayed no remorse for her conduct. In Ingram, Texas, a community of approximately 1,900 residents, local police integrated with ICE under a program revitalized by President Donald Trump in January 2025. This initiative deputizes local officers as deportation agents, with over 29,000 officers nationwide participating. Ingram, which is 45 percent Latino, saw its police department facilitate the deportation of roughly 10 percent of the town’s population within a year. Officer Jaron Alexander, who suggested the partnership to his chief, navigated these duties while grappling with personal and professional fallout. A 185-page internal investigation revealed Alexander had an affair prior to his divorce and used a county vehicle for the purpose, lying about the incident. Alexander’s interactions with resident Joanna Martinez illustrate the strain on local relationships. Their first encounter occurred in early October during a noise complaint check at a family baptism celebration. Alexander found no violations and departed. Subsequent encounters included pulling over Martinez’s work truck and her cousin, both of whom were handed to immigration agents. Alexander also stopped Martinez near her due date, warning her about illegal window tint. Despite these conflicts, Alexander stated he did not intend to target neighbors but incorporated the role into his existing duties. The integration of federal immigration enforcement into small-town policing has fractured communities, creating lasting divisions between law enforcement and the populations they serve.
Idi na primarne izvore (2)
Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.
ProPublica je prikupila podatke iz više od 500 slučajeva koji uključuju američke građane koje su zadržali savezni imigracijski agenti između 2025. i 2026. Izvještaj naglašava specifične incidente u više država u kojima su građani bili izloženi fizičkoj sili, dugotrajnom pritvoru ili pogrešnoj identitetu. Značajni primjeri uključuju biciklista u Long Beachu u Kaliforniji, koji je bio šokiran nakon sudara s ICE vozilom, i majku četvoro djece u Lafayetteu u Louisiani, koja je zadržana u pritvoru unatoč tome što je imala pravno zastupanje. U drugim slučajevima, kao što su oni u Evanstonu, Illinois, i Annapolis, Maryland, građani su prijavili ozljede ili produženo držanje bez trenutnog pristupa odvjetniku ili telefonima. Odgovori Federalnog odjela za domovinsku sigurnost (DHS) na ove incidente često su navodili nesaradnju s zakonitim zapovijedima ili potrebu za provjerom identiteta, dok su lokalna policija i neovisni svjedoci često proturječili službenim pričama o upotrebi sile ili početnoj osnovi za pritvor.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se tema prikazuje kroz kritički prizor prekoračenja izvršne vlasti i kršenja građanskih prava. Ona uspoređuje grafičke izvještaje o fizičkoj šteti i proceduralnim neuspjesima s očistim službenim opravdanjima, naglašavajući ranjivost građana, a ne potrebe nacionalne sigurnosti.
Zašto činjenice (90): This piece aggregates multiple distinct incidents involving U.S. citizens detained by ICE. Each claim is supported by specific media sources (NYT, CBS, etc.), providing high verifiability. The facts presented align with widely reported events, though the selection of cases inherently focuses on nega
Zašto objektivnost (60): While the individual facts are sourced, the compilation itself presents a one-sided narrative focusing exclusively on alleged abuses or errors by ICE. There is no counter-narrative or context regarding successful operations, creating a biased impression despite the factual accuracy of the listed inc
The Daily WireNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 40
Vrhovni sud Wisconsina pokrenuo je istragu o bivšoj sudiji okružnog suda okruga Milwaukee, Hannah Dugan, što bi moglo dovesti do njenog isključenja iz advokatske komore, nakon pritužbe koju je podnio Centar za unapređenje sigurnosti u Americi (CASA). U travnju 2025., Dugan je osuđen za opstrukciju kaznenog djela zbog usmjeravanja pojedinca s kriminalnom poviješću, identificiranog u izvještaju kao ilegalnog imigranta, kroz nejavna 'dvora porote' kako bi izbjegao otkrivanje od strane službenika imigracijske i carinske službe (ICE). Iako su savezne smjernice preporučile kaznu zatvora od 15 do 21 mjesec, Dugan je dobila kaznu od 5.000 dolara tijekom presude u srpnju, gdje je izrazila nadu u povratak u javnu službu. CASA tvrdi da ova kazna ne odražava punu odgovornost, naglašavajući da je ometanje savezne imigracijske provedbe jednako ometanju drugih važnih istraga provedbe zakona. Sudska istraga prati Duganov vidljivi bijes zbog prisutnosti agenata ICE-a i njenog karakterizacije situacije kao apsurdne.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se krivično ponašanje u prvenstveno prikazuje kroz prizmu imigracijske policije i nacionalne sigurnosti, koristeći izraze poput "ilegalnog imigranta" i uspoređujući ometanje ICE-a s ometanjem FBI-a. To naglašava razliku između preporučene zatvorske kazne i stvarne kazne.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reflects the specific legal proceedings regarding Judge Hannah Dugan, citing correct dates, charges, and outcomes based on the provided text. However, it relies on a single primary source (The Daily Wire) and lacks independent corroboration for details like the 'foot chase' or
Zašto objektivnost (40): The tone is highly partisan and emotionally charged. Phrases like 'EXCLUSIVE', 'shockingly', and the framing of the judge's actions as helping an 'illegal immigrant evade capture' reflect a strong ideological stance rather than neutral reporting.
Ovaj istražni izvještaj ispituje društveni utjecaj partnerstva između policije Ingrama u Teksasu i američke imigracijske i carinske službe (ICE). Nakon oživljavanja saveznog programa u siječnju 2025. godine koji omogućuje lokalnoj policiji da djeluje kao službenici za deportaciju, Ingram se pridružio inicijativi dok se još oporavljao od velike poplave. Članak se fokusira na časnika Jaron Alexandera, koji je predložio suradnju svom šefu i sada upravlja osobnim sukobima koji nastaju zbog primjene imigracijskih zakona protiv susjeda. Unatoč tome što grad ima manje od 2.000 stanovnika, lokalna policija olakšala je uklanjanje pojedinaca koji predstavljaju otprilike 10% stanovništva. Priča naglašava specifične incidente u kojima je Alexander komunicirao s obitelji Martinez, uključujući pritvaranje rođaka i upozorenje trudne stanovnice o kršenjima vozila, ilustrirajući kako je politika razbila povjerenje zajednice i podijelila obitelji.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se implementacija programa suradnje ICE-a prikazuje kao negativan razvoj koji je "razbio grad" i "zbunilo" zajednicu. Oslanjajući se na ljudski trošak u pritvorenim stanovnicima i opisujući postupke policajca kao uzrok svakodnevne borbe sa teškim posljedicama,
Zašto činjenice (80): The article provides detailed, human-interest reporting on the implementation of the 287(g) program in Ingram, Texas. Specific details like the population size and the officer's name are likely accurate based on local records, but the broader statistical claim ('equivalent of 10% of the town') requi
Zašto objektivnost (50): The writing style is literary and empathetic, focusing on the personal toll on residents. While not explicitly inflammatory, the framing emphasizes the social disruption and tension caused by the program, presenting a perspective that leans towards criticism of the policy's impact on the community.
The New York Times (US)Neovisan🔒ProgresivnoČinjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokumentObjektivnost 45
U članku se navodi da su u državama kao što je Florida, lokalnim službenicima za provođenje zakona, odgovornim za izdavanje dozvola za ribolov i inspekciju poljoprivrednih proizvoda, Imigracijska i carinska služba (ICE) dala ovlaštenje. To proširenje ovlasti omogućuje tim službenicima da sudjeluju u saveznim aktivnostima provedbe imigracije. Ovaj potez je opisan kao širenje opsega inicijativa predsjednika Trumpa o deportaciji integracijom lokalnih regulatornih uloga u savezne imigracijske operacije.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U naslovu se upotrebljava emocionalno napunjena fraza ("Kraj") kako bi se naglasila neočekivana priroda pritvora, što implicira negativne posljedice za uključene osobe. Podnaslov izričito uokviruje akciju kao "proširenje dosega" predsjedničke kampanje, koja nosi kritički ton.
Zašto činjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokument
Zašto objektivnost (45): The phrasing 'They Ended Up in ICE Detention' implies a causal link and potential injustice without providing the full legal context. The tone suggests a critique of the 'expanding reach' of the administration's policies, using language that frames the outcome negatively.
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.
progresivno
sredina
konzervativno
★
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.
United States
