The Senate of the Philippines has confirmed that it is fully prepared for the upcoming impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, which is set to commence on Monday, July 6, 2026. According to Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Ret. Maj. Gen. Alfred Corpus, extensive security measures have been implemented to ensure the smooth conduct of the proceedings. Various units from the Philippine National Police (PNP) have been mobilized to support the Senate’s security apparatus during the trial. Corpus emphasized that sufficient personnel would be stationed throughout the Senate building, including inside the chambers where the trial will take place. Additionally, members of the public interested in observing the proceedings are encouraged to register via the Senate’s Visitor Management System (VMS). Registration will be available starting at 2 p.m. the day before the trial begins, ensuring that the process is orderly and accessible to those wishing to witness the historic event.
One of the most contentious issues leading up to the trial concerns the handling of the so-called "BIR Green Box," a sealed container containing the tax records of Vice President Sara Duterte and her husband, Manases Carpio. This box was originally submitted by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to the House committee on justice during hearings in April 2026. Despite attempts to open it during pre-trial proceedings, the box remained sealed due to legal and procedural disputes. Senator Panfilo "Ping" Lacson, a prominent figure in the Senate, argued that the impeachment court has no authority to retain or handle such evidence. He stated that the responsibility of unsealing the box lies with the prosecution or the defense, not the court itself. Lacson further warned that the Senate could face accusations of grave abuse of discretion if it attempted to decide whether to open the box independently.
Despite the defense team's initial resistance, recent developments indicate a shift in their stance. House prosecutors, including Mamamayang Liberal party-list Representative Leila de Lima, reported that the defense has agreed in principle to allow the box to be marked as evidence before the Senate impeachment court. However, the defense insists that this process should occur in an executive session, away from public view. De Lima expressed skepticism about the necessity of such secrecy, emphasizing that the prosecution has the right to inspect and catalog the contents of the box. Lawyer Benjamin Tolosa Jr., the prosecution’s legal spokesperson, viewed this agreement as a positive step toward transparency, noting that it marks a departure from the defense’s previous opposition to even marking the box as evidence.
The issue of the BIR box has become a focal point in the broader context of the impeachment trial. Prosecutors argue that the tax records contained within the box are essential to proving the allegations of unexplained wealth and failure to disclose assets accurately. These allegations form the basis of Article II of the articles of impeachment, which accuse Vice President Duterte of acquiring wealth disproportionate to her lawful income. The defense, however, contends that the records in question pertain to periods when Duterte was not an impeachable officer, thus rendering them irrelevant to the current proceedings. Their legal team has consistently maintained that the documents cannot serve as a foundation for any impeachable offense, given the timeline of her tenure in public office.
Another critical aspect of the impending trial is the determination of the presiding officer. As of now, the Senate has not officially designated who will oversee the proceedings once the trial commences. Senate Secretary and Impeachment Clerk of Court Renato "Rey" Bantug Jr. indicated that the decision would be made on Monday, the day the trial begins. Under the amended Rules of Procedure on Impeachment Trials, the Senate president, currently Senator Sherwin "Win" Gatchalian, is expected to preside unless a majority of senators opt to select another senator-judge. Some senators, including Raffy Tulfo, have suggested that experienced legal figures such as Senators Francis "Kiko" Pangilinan or Francis "Chiz" Escudero might be suitable candidates for the role. Gatchalian himself has acknowledged the possibility of stepping aside if deemed necessary, stating that the focus should be on ensuring the trial proceeds efficiently and fairly.
The political landscape surrounding the trial is complex, with various stakeholders expressing differing views on the potential outcomes. While the Palace has urged Vice President Duterte to personally attend the trial to demonstrate her innocence, legal experts have highlighted the constitutional requirements for conviction or acquittal. According to the Constitution, a two-thirds vote of the senators who actually sit as judges in the impeachment court is required for a conviction. This means that the number of participating senators could significantly influence the outcome. Legal analysts suggest that the defense’s primary challenge will be securing enough votes to achieve an acquittal, given the gravity of the charges and the public interest in the proceedings.
As the trial approaches, the Senate has continued to prepare meticulously for the proceedings. A walk-through of the Senate building was recently conducted by Senate President Gatchalian to assess the readiness of the venues and facilities. Despite logistical challenges such as space limitations, the Senate has ensured that both the prosecution and defense will have the opportunity to inspect their assigned areas within the coming weeks. Security arrangements have been reinforced, and the overall atmosphere remains tense yet focused on conducting the trial in accordance with established procedures. With the trial set to begin on Monday, all eyes are on the Senate as it prepares to address one of the most significant legal and political moments in recent Philippine history.
8 izvještaja
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 95Objektivnost 90jučerU članku se izvještava o sigurnosnim pripremama koje sprovodi filipinski Senat za predstojeće suđenje za opoziv potpredsjednice Sare Duterte, koje bi trebalo početi u ponedjeljak.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja činjenične informacije o sigurnosnim aranžmanima za suđenje o opozivu bez da otvoreno favorizira bilo koju političku stranu.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article accurately reports Lacson's statement about returning the BIR box. It remains objective and presents the facts without taking sides.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 95Objektivnost 90prekjučer Senat još uvijek ne imenuje predsjedatelja dok se u ponedjeljak otvara suđenje Sari Duterte.Filipinski Senat još nije odlučio tko će predsjedavati suđenjem za opoziv potpredsjednice Sare Duterte, koje bi trebalo početi 6. srpnja. Sekretar Senata i službenik suda za opoziv Renato Bantug Jr. izjavio je da će odluka biti donesena u ponedjeljak, iako nisu primljene konačne upute. Prema izmijenjenim pravilima, predsjednik Senata, senator Sherwin Gatchalian, imenovan je za predsjednika osim ako većina izabere drugog senatora-suca.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja činjenične informacije o tekućem procesu o odabiru predsjednika za suđenje za opoziv potpredsjednice Sare Duterte, uključujući citate više senatora i dužnosnika, pružajući uravnotežene perspektive bez otvorene naklonosti bilo kojoj strani.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article accurately reports De Lima's statement on the BIR box. It remains objective and presents the facts without taking sides.
RapplerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 95Objektivnost 90prije 5 danaPravni tim potpredsjednice Sare Duterte izrazio je spremnost da otvori zapečaćenu kutiju s njezinim poreznim podacima pred Odborom za pravosuđe Predstavničkog doma, ali inzistira na tome da se to mora dogoditi na povjerljivoj izvršnoj sjednici. Oni tvrde da se dokumenti, koji obuhvaćaju razdoblja kada Duterte nije bio službenik podložan opozivu, ne mogu koristiti kao dokaz o bilo kakvim prekršajima podložnim opozivu. Tužiteljstvo je, međutim, dovelo u pitanje potrebu za tajnosti, sugerišući da se kutija može otvoriti javno s odgovarajućim zaštitnim mjerama.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljeni i stajalište obrane, naglašavajući povjerljivost i nevažnost prošlih poreskih evidencija za trenutne optužbe, i protivargumenti tužiteljstva koji dovode u pitanje potrebu za tajnosti.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article provides detailed and accurate reporting on the defense team's position regarding the BIR box. It remains objective and avoids taking sides in the debate.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 88prije 5 dana VP OK do BIR otvaranje kutija u zatvorenim vratima De LimaU pripremi za postupak opoziva u Senatu protiv potpredsjednice Sare Duterte, tužitelji u Predstavničkom domu objavili su da je Duterteov pravni tim pristao dopustiti da zapečaćena kutija s njezinim poreznim evidencijama bude označena kao dokaz, iako obrana preferira da se proces odvija privatno. Kutiju, koja sadrži porezne dokumente povezane s Duterteom i njezinim suprugom, prethodno je predao Ured za unutarnje prihode (BIR), ali je ostala neotvorena. Tužitelji tvrde da transparentnost zahtijeva otvaranje kutije i ispitivanje njenog sadržaja, dok se obrana u početku opirala čak i označavanju dokumenata.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljeni stavovi tužiteljstva i obrane u vezi s rukovanjem kutijom BIR koja sadrži poreske evidencije potpredsjednice Sare Duterte.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 88): Reports accurately on the legal team's change of position regarding the BIR box. Maintains objectivity by presenting both the prosecution's stance and the defense's request for executive session.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85prije 6 h Palača: Bolje da se potpredsjednica Sara Duterte pojavi na suđenju kako bi dokazala nevinostU članku se raspravlja o pripremama za suđenje potpredsjednici Sarari Duterte, fokusirajući se na njezin potencijalni osobni izgled kako bi se pokazala nevinost. Senat, koji djeluje kao sud za opoziv, trebao bi započeti suđenje, s ključnim pitanjima, uključujući rukovanje Biroom unutarnjih prihoda (BIR) zelenom kutijom koja sadrži Duterteove porezne zapise.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja više perspektiva bez da otvoreno favorizira jednu stranu. Uključuje izjave predstavnika Malacañanga koji se zalažu za Duterteovo osobno pojavljivanje i senatora Laxona koji se zalaže za vraćanje kutije BIR-a tužiteljstvu.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 85): The article presents factual information about the Palace's stance on Duterte appearing at her trial. It maintains a neutral tone but subtly suggests the importance of her presence without overt bias.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85jučer Lacson says impeach court has no business keeping BIR box, orders returnSenator Panfilio 'Ping' Lacson, representing the Senate's impeachment court, stated that the Senate has no legal authority to keep the sealed BIR green box containing Vice President Sara Duterte's tax records. He argued that the box should be returned to the House prosecution panel, emphasizing that evidence should be presented by either side during the trial. Lacson noted that keeping the box violates the law and warned that unsealing it could lead to accusations of misuse of power. He cited the National Internal Revenue Code, stating that tax records can only be disclosed with presidential authorization or a waiver from Duterte. The box was originally submitted by the BIR during a House hearing and later sent to the Senate after attempts to open it failed. The impeachment trial is scheduled to begin on June 6.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): While the article discusses a politically sensitive impeachment proceeding, the framing remains neutral. It presents both sides of the argument—Lacson's call for returning the box and the legal rationale behind his stance—without overtly favoring one side. The focus is on procedural legality rather
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 85): The article accurately reports the Senate's uncertainty about the presiding officer. It maintains a neutral tone while presenting the situation objectively.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85prije 4 dana Gatchalian: Potpredsjednički porezni podaci nisu glavni prioritet u programu opozivaPredsjednik Senata Sherwin Gatchalian izjavio je da otvaranje zapečaćene kutije Biroa za unutarnji prihod (BIR) koja sadrži porezne zapise potpredsjednice Sare Duterte možda nije glavni prioritet u programu suđenja za opoziv, koji počinje 6. srpnja. Sud za opoziv odlučit će hoće li se baviti tim pitanjem tijekom suđenja ako ga pokrene tužiteljstvo.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja informacije o procesu opoziva bez da otvoreno favorizira bilo koju stranu. Izvještava o proceduralnim odlukama koje je donio predsjednik Senata Gatchalian i opisuje stavove i tužilaštva i obrambene ekipe u vezi s kutijom BIR.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 85): The article accurately conveys Gatchalian's comments on the BIR box not being the top priority. It maintains a neutral tone while presenting his perspective without bias.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80prije 2 h Sara Duterte još uvijek može dati ostavku prije suđenja za opoziv odvjetniciPotpredsjednica Sara Duterte još uvijek može podnijeti ostavku prije početka suđenja za opoziv, prema odvjetniku Howardu Calleji, pozivajući se na presedane kao što su oni bivšeg ombudsmana Merceditasa Gutierreza i bivšeg predsjednika Komisije za izbore Andresa Bautiste. Međutim, odvjetnik Neri Colmenares tvrdi da ostavka ne bi spriječila da Duterte bude trajno diskvalificiran zbog podnošenja članaka o opozivu Senatu. Duterte se suočava s optužbama uključujući zlouporabu povjerljivih sredstava, neobjašnjeno bogatstvo, navodne prijetnje protiv predsjednika Ferdinanda Marcosa mlađeg i podmićivanje obrazovnih dužnosnika.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja obje perspektive - odvjetnik Howard Calleja sugerira ostavku kao opciju, a odvjetnica Neri Colmenares tvrdi da to ne bi spriječilo trajnu diskvalifikaciju - ne favorizirajući nijednu stranu.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 80): The article accurately reports legal arguments regarding Duterte's potential resignation and the implications of impeachment. However, it leans slightly toward the opposition's perspective by emphasizing the permanence of disqualification.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
PH
