ON
← Natrag na feed
Ruši se nikad otvoreni futuristički kompleks u koji je upucano 25 milijuna eura javnog novca
Croatia🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnoprije 5 h

Ruši se nikad otvoreni futuristički kompleks u koji je upucano 25 milijuna eura javnog novca

Vladar Tbilisije odobrio je uništenje budućeg "Futurističkog kulturnog kompleksa", koji je projektirao talijanski arhitekt Massimiliano Fuksas. Kompleks, koji se nalazi na obali rijeke Kure unutar parka Rike, bio je dio kontroverznog projekta koji je bio financiran 25 milijuna eura javnog novca. Kritičari smatraju da se zgrada ne uklapa u povijesni lik grada, dok su bivši pristaši predsjednika Mihaila Sakašvilija smatrali da je simbol njegove napore da brzo modernizira zemlju. Plan je izazvao optužbe da vlada nastoji izbrisati arhitektonske simbole povezane s političkim protivnicima.

The government of Georgia has approved the demolition of a never-opened futuristic cultural complex in its capital, Tbilisi, which was built using 25 million euros of public funds. The decision has reignited a long-standing debate over one of the city’s most controversial landmarks. The structure, designed by Italian architect Massimiliano Fuksas, consists of two silver-colored steel and glass tubes connected by a supporting wall, forming a unique architectural form. Located along the banks of the Kura River within the Rike Park, the complex was intended to serve as a multifunctional space featuring a concert hall with 566 seats, exhibition spaces, technical rooms, storage areas, and a theater. Its design, described as resembling a periscope, offers panoramic views of the river and the historic core of Old Tbilisi. Construction of the complex began under former President Mikheil Saakashvili, who was later imprisoned after losing power to the ruling party, Georgian Dream, in 2012. Following his ousting, the project stalled, leaving the interior unfinished. Over the years, the building changed hands multiple times, was put up for auction, and became the subject of numerous proposals for repurposing. However, none of these efforts led to a viable continuation of the project. In 2022, control of the site was transferred to a company owned by entrepreneur David Khidashelidze, who later sold the property to a new owner. The current owner, Rike Dome, acquired the complex in June 2025. In late 2025, the accidental death of a teenager near the abandoned structure once again brought public attention to its deteriorating condition. In response, the mayor announced plans to demolish the building. The landowner, who intends to construct a hotel on the site, must complete the demolition by December 25. This deadline adds urgency to the process, as the demolition is expected to be finalized by year's end. Former President Saakashvili has strongly opposed the plan, calling the complex a “world-class architectural and cultural masterpiece” and accusing authorities of destroying a public asset. According to the Georgian fact-checking organization FactCheck.ge, approximately 25 million euros have already been spent on the project through public funding. The decision has also drawn criticism from the architect himself, who called the plan “madness.” Fuksas, aged 82, stated during a radio interview with Radio Free Europe that he had contacted Georgian authorities in May to discuss potential alternative uses for the complex but received no response. The demolition has sparked accusations of political retaliation against the opposition. Critics claim that the ruling party, Georgian Dream, seeks to erase symbols associated with its political rivals. The controversy highlights ongoing tensions between different factions within Georgian politics, particularly regarding the legacy of past leaders and the direction of urban development. As the demolition proceeds, the fate of this ambitious yet unfinished structure continues to reflect broader debates about public investment, architectural vision, and political accountability.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

1 izvještaja

tportal logotportalNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prije 5 h
Ruši se nikad otvoreni futuristički kompleks u koji je upucano 25 milijuna eura javnog novca

Vladar Tbilisije odobrio je uništenje budućeg "Futurističkog kulturnog kompleksa", koji je projektirao talijanski arhitekt Massimiliano Fuksas. Kompleks, koji se nalazi na obali rijeke Kure unutar parka Rike, bio je dio kontroverznog projekta koji je bio financiran 25 milijuna eura javnog novca. Kritičari smatraju da se zgrada ne uklapa u povijesni lik grada, dok su bivši pristaši predsjednika Mihaila Sakašvilija smatrali da je simbol njegove napore da brzo modernizira zemlju. Plan je izazvao optužbe da vlada nastoji izbrisati arhitektonske simbole povezane s političkim protivnicima.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): Članak naglašava optužbe vlade, koja je desno orijentirana, nastoji izbrisati arhitektonske simbole povezane s lijevo orijentiranim političkim protivnicima. Iako se ne radi o izravnom političkom poricanju, članak sugerira da vlada koristi rušenje kao politički alat, što ukazuje na levi kl

Zašto činjenice (85): The article provides detailed information about the planned demolition of an unfinished futuristic complex in Tbilisi, citing sources such as political parties and public statements. It references the architect, the project’s design, and historical context regarding the former president Mikhail Saak

Zašto objektivnost (70): The article presents a somewhat biased perspective by emphasizing the political angle, suggesting that the ruling party is trying to erase symbols linked to their political opponent. The tone leans toward critical commentary rather than purely factual reporting.

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče