Former Senate president Franklin Drilon warned of growing public frustration with the slow pace of Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment trial, urging the Senate to take stronger control of the proceedings. Speaking during a town hall with Rappler+ members on July 17, 2026, Drilon described the trial as suffering from “impeachment fatigue” just two weeks into the process. He criticized the manner in which lawyers have approached the trial, likening it to an ordinary court case rather than a high-stakes political and constitutional proceeding. According to Drilon, this approach has led to unnecessary delays, particularly in the handling of evidence. Drilon pointed to the extensive time spent authenticating a video of Duterte making threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former House speaker Martin Romualdez. The video, which has already been widely viewed by millions of Filipinos, required two full days of procedural review before it could be officially accepted as evidence. Drilon argued that the parties involved could have either stipulated to the video’s authenticity or allowed the impeachment court to take judicial notice of it, thereby saving valuable time. He emphasized that the trial is not merely a legal proceeding but also a public affair, one that requires clarity and engagement. Drilon called for greater authority from Senate President Win Gatchalian and impeachment court presiding officer Chiz Escudero to manage the trial more efficiently. He noted that the Senate leadership has a responsibility to ensure that the public remains informed and interested in the outcome of the proceedings. Drilon expressed confidence that reforms would follow once the court evaluates the first two weeks of the trial. The impeachment trial, which began on July 6, has thus far lasted approximately 26.98 hours. It is scheduled to continue from Monday to Wednesday, starting at 2 p.m. However, the trial has faced challenges in terms of speed and efficiency. A recent decision by the House prosecution to not present at least six witnesses helped expedite the process slightly, although only two witnesses have testified so far. The trial is expected to span 92 days, potentially extending into early 2027. Senator Erwin Tulfo, speaking on July 19, suggested that the Senate could adjust its schedule to better accommodate the public. He proposed holding trial sessions from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., with possible extensions to 3 p.m. if necessary. Proceedings would then conclude with the Senate’s regular session at 4 p.m. However, according to the pre-trial brief, trial sessions starting July 28 are set to begin at 3 p.m., running from Wednesday to Thursday. These scheduling differences highlight ongoing discussions about how best to balance the demands of the trial with the need for public accessibility. Meanwhile, the Senate has rejected Vice President Duterte’s request for the chamber to cover the cost of catering for her staff and legal team. Senator Erwin Tulfo stated that the decision was made by Senate President Sherwin Gatchalian, with the majority of senators opposing the request. They raised concerns about financial accountability and the potential for scrutiny from the Commission on Audit. The Senate maintains that food for the OVP’s personnel is not included in its budget, and accepting such a request could lead to complications in future allocations. Representative Terry Ridon highlighted another critical aspect of the trial: identifying the true beneficiaries of the alleged misuse of confidential funds. He noted that the prosecution will focus on verifying the existence of individuals such as “Mary Grace Piattos” and “Milky Secuya,” who are listed as recipients of funds allegedly misused by Duterte. Ridon emphasized that if these individuals are fictional, the trial must determine who actually received the money. This issue will be central to the prosecution’s arguments as they prepare to present evidence on the charges of misuse of confidential funds and betrayal of public trust. The prosecution is set to begin presenting evidence related to the confidential funds charge on July 22. This includes records from the Philippine Statistics Authority indicating that no official documents, such as birth, marriage, or death certificates, exist for the named recipients. Additionally, the prosecution plans to bring in an expert from the National Bureau of Investigation to analyze signature similarities on acknowledgment receipts. The Commission on Audit’s findings, including a notice of disallowance covering P73.287 million in disputed expenses, will also be presented as part of the evidence. These materials aim to establish whether the funds were used lawfully or if their use constitutes a breach of public trust.
5 izvještaja
RapplerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 75prije 12 danaBivši predsjednik Senata Franklin Drilon izrazio je zabrinutost tijekom događaja u gradskoj dvorani zbog usporavanja postupka opoziva protiv potpredsjednice Sare Duterte, upozoravajući na "umor od opoziva" samo dva tjedna u postupku. Kritizirao je pravne timove zbog tretiranja suđenja kao običnog sudskog slučaja, što je dovelo do prekomjernog vremena potrošenog na proceduralna pitanja kao što su autentifikacija videozapisa. Drilon je pozvao na jače vodstvo predsjednika Senata Win Gatchaliana i predsjednika suda za opoziv Chiz Escudera kako bi poboljšali učinkovitost i održali javni angažman. Naglasio je važnost informiranja javnosti i predložio potencijalne reforme na temelju napretka suđenja. Suđenje, koje je počelo 6. srpnja, već je trajalo više od 26 sati i predviđa se da će se produžiti do početka 2027. godine.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Dok članak raspravlja o politički osjetljivom suđenju za opoziv, okvir ostaje neutralan.
Zašto činjenice (90): The article accurately reports on former Senate president Franklin Drilon's comments regarding impeachment fatigue and calls for streamlining the trial. These statements are supported by the context of the ongoing trial and the legal procedures outlined in the primary source document. The informatio
Zašto objektivnost (75): While the article provides factual reporting, it carries a somewhat critical tone towards the current pace of the trial, suggesting that the process is inefficient. This slight bias is evident in the emphasis on the need for faster proceedings.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80prije 9 danaSenator Erwin Tulfo izjavio je da je većina u Senatu odbila zahtjev potpredsjednice Sare Duterte da Senat pokrije troškove prehrane za njezino osoblje i pravni tim tijekom njenog tekućeg suđenja za opoziv. Predsjednik Senata, Sherwin Gatchalian, donijet će konačnu odluku, ali Tulfo je naznačio da se većina protivi zahtjevu.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljeni potpredsjednikov zahtjev i opozicija Senata bez da se otvoreno favorizira bilo koja strana.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports Sen. Erwin Tulfo's statement regarding the Senate's rejection of Vice President Duterte's catering request. It references the specific details from Duterte's letter dated July 7, including the request for the Senate to shoulder food and beverage costs and the requireme
Zašto objektivnost (80): The article presents the statements of Sen. Erwin Tulfo and Vice President Duterte in a neutral manner, quoting both sides. However, there is a slight倾向 towards reporting the Senate's position as more principled, which could be seen as a minor editorial tilt. The language remains generally objective
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80prije 13 dana Ako "Mary Grace Piattos" ne postoji, tko je dobio novac?Zastupnik Terry Ridon najavio je da će se tužiteljstvo u Predstavničkom domu usredotočiti na provjeru identiteta pojedinaca kao što su 'Mary Grace Piattos' i 'Milky Secuya', za koje se tvrdi da su primili povjerljiva sredstva iz Ureda potpredsjednika (OVP).
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se postupak opoziva opisuje kao legitimni pravni postupak čiji je cilj da se potpredsjednik Duterte proglasi odgovornim za navodno financijsko kršenje zakona.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reflects the arguments made by Robert Ace Barbers and Benjamin Tolosa, emphasizing that impeachment is not a popularity contest. It references the SWS survey and the legal precedent of Chief Justice Corona’s trial, maintaining factual consistency.
Zašto objektivnost (80): The article leans slightly toward the prosecution's viewpoint by reinforcing the idea that public opinion should not influence the impeachment process. This subtle bias affects the overall objectivity.
RapplerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 88prije 15 dana Nema nove žalbe za opoziv protiv Marcosa poslate SenatuNa društvenim mrežama je cirkulirala tvrdnja da je Senatu poslana nova pritužba za opoziv protiv filipinskog predsjednika Ferdinanda Marcosa mlađeg, koja je provjerena i ocijenjena kao lažna. Najnovije pritužbe za opoziv protiv Marcosa odbačene su u veljači 2026. godine, što je pokrenulo razdoblje jednogodišnjeg imuniteta od daljnjih postupaka za opoziv.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja uravnoteženu provjeru činjenica o tvrdnji koja se odnosi na politički krajolik Filipina, pružajući i lažne tvrdnje i provjerene činjenice bez zauzimanja stava.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reports the impeachment court's ruling regarding the withdrawal of witnesses. It includes direct quotes from Senator-Judge Escudero and defense counsel Sheila Sison. However, it lacks some contextual details found in the primary source documents, such as the specific witnesses
Zašto objektivnost (88): The article maintains a balanced perspective, presenting both the defense's concerns and the court's ruling without showing favoritism. It uses neutral language throughout.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 80prije 8 dana Potpredsjednik odbrane, osoblje će morati platiti za svoju hranu.Tijekom suđenja za opoziv potpredsjednici Sari Duterte, predsjednik Senata, Sherwin Gatchalian, izjavio je da Senat ne može priuštiti pokrivanje troškova prehrane za Duterteovo osoblje i pravni tim. Ured potpredsjednika prethodno je zatražio da Senat obezbedi hranu i piće za ove osobe na trošak komore. Gatchalian je pojasnio da, iako Senat još nije službeno odgovorio na ovaj zahtjev, proračunska ograničenja onemogućavaju odobrenje zahtjeva.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja obje strane rasprave o odgovornosti Senata da financira catering za suđenje za opoziv.
Zašto činjenice (75): The article repeats the survey findings from article 3 but adds no new information. It is accurate but lacks additional context or depth compared to the original survey report.
Zašto objektivnost (80): The article presents the survey results neutrally, focusing on the public's desire for decisions based on law and evidence rather than political factors.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
PH
