ON
← Natrag na feed
Preko Ubera i Bolta u jednoj sezoni 'zaradio' više od 1,7 milijuna eura. Optužen je
Croatia🏛️ PolitikaSredinaprije 8 h

Preko Ubera i Bolta u jednoj sezoni 'zaradio' više od 1,7 milijuna eura. Optužen je

U Splitu, 29-godišnji vlasnik taksi prijevoznika bio je optužen za zlouporabu povjerenja, prikrivanje poreza i skrivanje poslovne dokumentacije. Optužnica, koju je podigla županijsko državno odvjetništvo, pokazuje da je iznosio štetu od gotovo 600 tisuća eura prema prvoj točki, što uključuje nepravilno korištenje novca društva i nedostatak plaćanja PDV-a. Druga točka optužnice ukazuje na štetu državnog proračuna od 631 tisuća eura zbog nedostatka prijave usluga od estonskog Bolt-a i amsterdamskog Uber-a, kao i nedostatak plaćanja PDV-a u iznosima od 427 tisuća eura. Treća točka navodi optužnice za skrivanje poslovne dokumentacije koje je rasprostranilo nadzorno tijelo.

A 29-year-old man based in Split has been charged with alleged misuse of trust and authority, tax evasion, and failure to maintain business records. The charge comes after an investigation by the Split County State Prosecutor's Office, which focused on activities spanning May through September 2023—essentially one summer season. The accused is the owner of a limited liability company engaged in taxi services. According to the indictment, he caused damage to the company amounting to nearly €600,000 by withdrawing funds from its account and retaining them without using them for legitimate business purposes. The indictment outlines three main charges against him. First, it accuses him of causing financial harm to the company by misusing its funds. Second, it claims he evaded taxes by failing to report all business transactions. Specifically, he did not declare revenue generated from services provided via Estonian ride-hailing service Bolt and Amsterdam-based Uber, totaling €546,000 and €1.162 million respectively. As a result, he failed to report and pay over €427,000 in value-added tax (VAT). Additionally, he did not declare the base amount for VAT calculation, which amounted to €816,000 for the taxi services rendered, thereby avoiding an additional €204,000 in VAT payments. Third, the indictment states that he concealed business documentation by removing accounting books, thus preventing officials from the Tax Administration from conducting inspections. These actions allegedly allowed him to conceal his financial dealings and avoid scrutiny from regulatory bodies. The indictment highlights the scale of the alleged misconduct, particularly given the high volume of income derived from digital platforms such as Uber and Bolt during a single tourist season. The case involves multiple legal aspects, including corporate governance, tax compliance, and record-keeping obligations. The accused’s company operated within the taxi industry, a sector known for its reliance on digital payment systems and platform-based operations. This context raises questions about how such businesses manage their financial reporting and tax liabilities, especially when operating across different jurisdictions. The indictment suggests that the individual exploited loopholes or failed to comply with existing regulations, leading to substantial losses for both the company and the state treasury. Authorities have emphasized the importance of maintaining accurate business records and fulfilling tax obligations. The indictment serves as a warning to other business owners about the consequences of non-compliance with fiscal laws. It also underscores the role of digital platforms in modern commerce and the challenges they pose for regulatory oversight. The accused faces potential penalties that could include fines and imprisonment, depending on the outcome of the trial. The case is currently under review by the court, and further proceedings will determine the validity of the charges. Legal experts suggest that the prosecution must provide sufficient evidence to prove intent and negligence on the part of the defendant. Meanwhile, the incident has sparked discussions among local business communities about the need for greater awareness of tax and accounting requirements, particularly for companies relying heavily on online services. The Split County State Prosecutor's Office has indicated that the investigation into this case is ongoing, and additional information may emerge as the legal process unfolds. Until then, the accused remains free on bail while awaiting trial.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

1 izvještaja

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 65prije 8 h
Preko Ubera i Bolta u jednoj sezoni 'zaradio' više od 1,7 milijuna eura. Optužen je

U Splitu, 29-godišnji vlasnik taksi prijevoznika bio je optužen za zlouporabu povjerenja, prikrivanje poreza i skrivanje poslovne dokumentacije. Optužnica, koju je podigla županijsko državno odvjetništvo, pokazuje da je iznosio štetu od gotovo 600 tisuća eura prema prvoj točki, što uključuje nepravilno korištenje novca društva i nedostatak plaćanja PDV-a. Druga točka optužnice ukazuje na štetu državnog proračuna od 631 tisuća eura zbog nedostatka prijave usluga od estonskog Bolt-a i amsterdamskog Uber-a, kao i nedostatak plaćanja PDV-a u iznosima od 427 tisuća eura. Treća točka navodi optužnice za skrivanje poslovne dokumentacije koje je rasprostranilo nadzorno tijelo.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja objektivnu optužnicu protiv pojedinca, bez evidentnog političkog slanja ili strane perspektive.

Zašto činjenice (75): The article reports on an indictment filed by the County State Prosecutor's Office in Split against a 29-year-old business owner accused of misuse of trust, tax evasion, and failure to maintain commercial records. It provides specific details from the indictment including financial figures and alleg

Zašto objektivnost (65): The article presents the facts as reported in the indictment but uses somewhat dramatic language such as 'zaradio više od 1,7 milijuna eura' which implies a positive outcome for the individual. While it remains largely factual, there is a slight bias in emphasizing the financial gains before detaili

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče